Navigating the Intersection of Corporate Governance and Corporate Tax Planning: A Scoping Review

Authors

  • Noor Emilina Mohd Nasir Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Najihah Marha Yaacob Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Siti Nurhazwani Kamarudin Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Terengganu, Kampus Dungun, 23000 Dungun, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Norfadzilah Rashid Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
  • Nik Norlaili Jamilah Nik Othman Center of STEM Enculturation, Faculty Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi Campus, 43650 Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.119.2.17403

Keywords:

Scoping Review, Corporate Governance, Tax Planning, Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

The scoping review analyses the convergence of corporate governance and corporate tax planning. The aim of this review is to identify the publication trends, key issues and areas of limited understanding in the current academic literature. Corporate governance structures balance the interests of shareholders, management and other stakeholders. Tax planning, on the other hand, involves strategies aimed at reducing an organisation's tax liability while ensuring compliance. Recent studies point to a intricate relationship between these two areas. The extent and form of tax planning activities can be influenced by corporate governance mechanisms, including ownership structure and board composition. Strong, independent boards may be more inclined to favour tax strategies that are consistent with long-term value creation rather than resorting to aggressive tax planning strategies. Hence, the objective of this review relevant academic articles, focusing on research that examines the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and corporate tax planning. This will provide a basis for future research that can further investigate this important relationship. Overall, this scoping review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on the influence of corporate governance on companies' tax planning practises. This information can provide valuable insights to policymakers, regulators and business leaders in their efforts to create a fair and open tax environment.

References

Pricewaterhouse Coopers. (2012, August). PwC Alert Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance 2012, Issue 103, retrieved from www.pwc.com.my

Fama, E. and Jensen, M.C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), p. 301-26.

Taliyang, S. M., & Jusop, M. (2011). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure: Evidence in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (12), p. 109-117.

Zainazor, Z., Nasir, N. E. M., Rashid, N., & Awang, Y. (2023). Financial determinants of corporate tax planning among Malaysian listed companies in trading and services. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 7(S1), p. 80-88.

Bhagiawan, G. & Mukhlasin, M. (2020). Effect of corporate governance on tax planning & firm value, International Journal of Commerce and Finance, 6 (2), p. 72-80.

Nwaobia, A. and Jayeoba, O. O. (2016). Tax planning and firms’ liquidity, IJRDO-Journal of Business Management, 2(10), p. 1–22.

Pohan, C. A. (2018). Panduan Lengkap Pajak Internasional. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), p. 19-32. 101

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 169(7), p. 467-473.

Rejab, S. N. M., & Lateh, N. (2022). The influence of zakat and taxes in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, (1), p. 54-63.

Hannah, E., O'Hare, B., Lopez, M., Etter-Phoya, R., Murray, S., & Hall, S. (2022). The contribution of corporate tax to the Sustainable Development Goals in Sub-Saharan Africa employing econometric modelling: A case study of Vodafone. Available at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1505508/v1

Raman, R., Lathabhai, H., Pattnaik, D., Kumar, C., & Nedungadi, P. (2024). Research contribution of bibliometric studies related to sustainable development goals and sustainability. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), p. 7.

Campagnolo, L., & Davide, M. (2019). Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of climate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality. World Development, 122, p. 96-109.

Hekmat, H., Heydarzadeh, V., Kandi, K. & Alizadeh, S. (2023). The effect of social responsibility performance on the relationship between tax planning and corporation value, Journal of Empirical Research in Accounting, 13 (50), p. 13-16.

Nasir, N. E. M., Kamarudin, S. N., Rashid, N., & Yaacob, N. M. (2023). The longitudinal study of measuring corporate tax planning: Evidence from industrial product companies. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 7(S1), p. 36-44.

Nasir, N. E. M., Rashid, N., Kamarudin, S. N., & Yaacob, N. M. (2024). Nexus of corporate tax planning in Malaysia’s trading and services. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 133, p. 412-419.

Olayiwola, J. & Okoro, S. (2021). Tax planning, corporate governance and financial performance of selected quoted non-financial companies in Nigeria (2007–2018). Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 24, p. 332-352.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-11

How to Cite

Nasir, N. E. M., Yaacob, N. M., Kamarudin, S. N., Rashid, N., & Othman, N. N. J. N. (2024). Navigating the Intersection of Corporate Governance and Corporate Tax Planning: A Scoping Review. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(9.2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.119.2.17403

Most read articles by the same author(s)