Essentials of Functional Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: The Zambian Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.16130Keywords:
monitoring, evaluation, demand & supply-sides, whole-of-government, M&E system, ZambiaAbstract
Since the turn of the 21st century in the year 2000, it has become increasingly impossible to design and implement a development intervention, be it a project, programme or policy without articulating a sound monitoring and evaluation framework. More demanded are functional monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems. It is for that reason that governments, civil society organisations, non-governmental organizations, bilateral and multilateral agencies have all adopted the agenda of strengthening their systems for M&E. Among others, known benefits from implementing sound M&E include enhancing accountability, feedback and learning. This paper articulates essentials development agencies, and their respective stakeholders need to put in place for their M&E systems to function well. More so, focus is on building stronger whole-of-government M&E systems. Essentially, a typical M&E system would have two sides, both of which would be crucial for a successful and functional whole-of-government M&E system. These are the supply-side and the demand-side. In addition, there are known essentials deemed crucial to a successful whole-of-government M&E system. These include the political and technical issues associated with implementing country systems for M&E. Another essential is the ownership of M&E systems. Further, the paper also presents a comprehensive section showing the fundamental ten steps for building a functional whole-of-government M&E system. When these aspects are understood by governments and carefully institutionalised across structures, M&E would prove to be a useful tool to promote accountability, feedback and learning. It also goes without saying, that, in the absence of a stronger system for M&E, governments will most likely not tell success from failure, not see success and would fail to reward it. As such, governments would probably never recognize its failures, thus failing to correct it and ultimately fall short of demonstrating development results. Once these happen, such governments would not win public support.
References
Bamberger, M. 1991. The politics of evaluation in developing countries. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14 (1): 325–339.
Bamberger, M. 2010. Institutionalising Impact Evaluation. A key element in strengthening country-led monitoring and evaluation systems. In M. Segone (Ed.). From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. Geneva: UNICEF.
Bedi, T., Coudouel, A., Cox, M., Goldstein, M. & Thornton, N. 2006. Beyond the numbers: Understanding the institutions for monitoring poverty reduction strategies. The World Bank.Washington, D.C.
Booth, D. & Lucas, H. 2002. Good Practice in the Development of PRSP Indicators and Monitoring Systems, ODI Working Paper 172. Overseas Development Institute, London.
Kanyamuna, V. & Sibalwa, G. (2023) An Investigation of Factors that Contribute to Qualified External Audit Reports at The University of Zambia, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 10 (1), 279-301.
Booth, D. 2005. Missing links in the politics of development: Learning from the PRSP experiment, ODI Working Paper No. 256. Overseas Development Institute, London.
Kanyamuna, V. & Kone, Y, D, Z. (2022) Reforming the Public Financial Management System for Better Performance Budgeting in Ivory Coast, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (8), 101-121.
Briceno, B. 2010. Defining the Type of M&E system: Clients, Intended uses and actual utilisation. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Brushett, S. 1998. Evaluation Capacity Development in Zimbabwe: Issues and Opportunities. OED, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Zulu, K., Kanyamuna, Chunga, C.K. & Simenti-Phiri, E. (2023) The Changing Paradigms of Zambia’s National Development Planning: An Enigma or A Necessity? World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9 (1), 34-47.
Burdescu, R., Villar, A., Mackay, K., Rojas, F. & Saavedra, J. 2005. Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Five experiences from Latin America. Prem Notes, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Castro, M. F. 2009. Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Management and Evaluation System in Colombia. ECD Working Paper 18, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Castro, M.F., Lopez-Acevado, G., Busjeet, G.B. & Ardonez, X.F. 2009. Mexico's M&E System: Scaling up from the sectoral to the National Level. Evaluation Capacity Development. IEG. The Word Bank, Washington, D.C.
Banda, S., Chanda, J. & Kanyamuna, V. (2022) African Parliaments Systems of Evidence in Practice-Zambia: Parliamentary Institutions and Implications for Evidence Use.
Development Bank of Southern Africa. 2000. Selected Proceedings from a Seminar and workshop organised by the Development Bank of Southern Africa, the African Development Bank and the World Bank on Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity Development in Africa. In Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity in Africa (pp. 25–29). Johannesburg, South Africa: African Development Bank and the World Bank.
Engela, R. & Ajam, T. 2010. Evaluation Capacity Development: Implementing a Government-Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System in South Africa, Working Paper Series No. 21 No. 21. OED, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Feinstein, O. & Zapico-Goñi, E. 2010. Evaluation of Government Performance and Public Policies in Spain. ECD Working Paper No. 22. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Görgens, M. & Kusek, J. 2009. Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work: A Capacity Development Toolkit. IBRD World Bank, Washington DC.
Bwanga, C., Kanyamuna, V. & Qutieshat, A. (2023) Effect of Leadership and Performance Management on Public Service Delivery in Zambia, World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9 (2), 48-56. 380
GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2016. 2015 Annual Progress Report for the Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development. Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
Harry, H. 2010. Key steps in Designing and Implementing a Monitoring and Evaluation Process for Individual Country Service Agencies. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Hwang, H. 2014. Building Monitoring and Evaluation Capacity in young systems: The experiences of Rwanda, Vietnam and Yemen. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V. 2013. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. MSc–dissertation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C. & Mwale, A. 2018. An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2): 75–86.
Karel, V. & Holvoet, H. 2000. Glossary of selected Monitoring and Evaluation Methods and Mechanisms. University of Antwerp, Antwerpen.
Kumar, K. & Casley, D. J. 1988. The Collection, Analysis and use of Monitoring and Evaluation Data. The
Kusek, J. Z. & Rist, R. C. 2002. Building Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Assessing Developing Countries Readiness. Zeitschrift Für Evaluation, 1 (1): 151–158.
Kusek, J. Z. & Rist, R. C. 2004. Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation Systems. A Handbook for Development Practitioners. The World Bank. Washington D.C.
Lahey, R. 2010. The Canadian M&E system: Lessons Learned from 30 years of Development, ECD Working Paper No. 23. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Lahey, R. 2011. The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., Siamabele, B., Phiri, M., Mubita, A., & Kalonje, V. (2023). Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements in Zambia’s Public Sector: Shifting Sands or a Solid Rock? Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(11), 382–413. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1011.15905
Leiderer, S. 2013. Donor coordination for effective government policies? Implementation of the new aid effectiveness agenda in health and education in Zambia. United Nations University.
Liverani, A. & Lundgren, H. E. 2007. Evaluation Systems in Development Aid Agencies: An Analysis of DAC Peer Reviews 1996-2004. Evaluation, 13(2): 241–256.
Mackay, K. 1999. Evaluation Capacity Development: A Diagnostic Guide and Action Framework, ECD Working Paper Series No. 6. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., Siakalima, S., Phiri-Mumba, R. & Munsanda, P. (2022) Understanding Research Methods in Development Context: A Synthesis Paper on Research in Development Arenas, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (1), 349-358.
Mackay, K. 2007. How to Build M&E Systems to Support Better Government. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and World Bank. The World Bank, Washington D.C. 381
Mackay, K. 2011. The Australian Government’s Performance Framework, ECD Working Paper No. 25. The
Mackay, K. 2011. The Performance Framework of the Australian Government, 1987–2011. OECD Journal on Budgeting.
Mark, K. & Pfeiffer, J. 2011. Monitoring and Evaluation in the United States Government: An overview, ECD Working Paper No. 26. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Zulu, K., Simenti-Phiri, E. & Kanyamuna, V., Chitembo, K. C. & Tembo, H. (2022) Application of Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) as a Tool to Evaluate Climate Action Spending on Climate Smart Agriculture Initiatives: An Experimental Study of the Usage of BIA on Agriculture-Related Spending in Zambia, International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 12 (9), 23-34.
May, E., Shand, D., Mackay, K., Rojas, F. & Saavedra, J. (Eds.). 2006. Towards the Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: Proceedings of a World Bank Conference. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Naidoo, I. 2010. Monitoring and Evaluation in South Africa. Many purposes, multiple systems. In M. Sergone (Ed.). From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. New York: UNICEF: pp. 303–320.
Kanyamuna, V., Mulonda, M. & Mulele, C.S. 2019. Monitoring and Evaluation Legislation in Zambia–Gap Analysis. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 4(1): 15-25.
Naidoo, I. 2011. The role of monitoring and evaluation in promoting good governance in South Africa: A case study of the Department of Social Development: PhD–Thesis submitted to the Graduate School of Public & Development Management in fulfilment of the requirements for doctorate degree. University of Witwatersrand.
Moyo, F., Kanyamuna, V. & Mubita, A. (2023) Role of Social Science Research in National Development: A Review of Relevant Literature, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 10 (6), 42-76
OECD/DAC. 2010. 2008 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration: Effective Aid by 2010? What it will take - Vol. 1 Overview. Paris.OECD Publications.
Ongevalle, J. V., Huyse, H. & Boutylkova, E. 2012. Dealing with Complexity through ‘actor focused’ Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (PME): From Results-Based Management towards Results-Based Learning. PSO, Leuven: PSO, Leuven.
Porter, S. 2012. ‘The Growing Demand for Monitoring and Evaluation in Africa’, in Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results CLEAR (ed.), African Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Exploratory Case Studies (Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand).
Segone, M. (Ed.). 2008. Bridging the gap: The role of Monitoring and Evaluation in evidence-based policymaking. UNICEF, Geneva.
Siakalima, S. & Kanyamuna, V. (2022) Community Schooling System in Zambia: Its Evolution and Stakeholder Perspectives, American Journal of Educational Research, 10 (9), 571-578.
Kanyamuna, V., Chawapiwa, O. & Bwanga, C. (2023) The Effectiveness of Service Delivery in Fast Moving Consumer Goods Supply Value Chain: A Case Study of Brands Africa Zambia Limited Company, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10 (2), 420- 446.
Segone, M. (Ed), 2010. From policies to results. Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. UNICEF, DevInfo, IDEAS, ILO, IOCE, UNDP, UNIFEM, WFP and World Bank. 382
Shepherd, G. 2011. Conducting Diagnosis of M&E systems and Capacities. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., KONE, Y, D, Z. & Mubita, A. (2022) Linking Budget and Policies: The Case of Ivory Coast, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (4), 244-266.
Stern, E., Stame, N., Mayne, J., Forss, K., Davies, R. & Befani, B. 2012. Broadening the Range Designs and Methods for Impact Evaluations: Report of a study Commissioned by the Departments for International Development, Working Paper 38. DFID, United Kingdom.
Talbot, C. 2010. Performance in Government: The evolving system of Performance and Evaluation Measurement, Monitoring and Management in the United Kingdom, ECD Working Paper No. 24. The
UNDP. 2002. Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluating for Results. UNDP Evaluation Office, New York.
Kanyamuna, V., KONE, Y, D, Z. & Mubita, A. (2022) Evaluation of Budget Execution Process in Ivory Coast, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, (IJHSSI) 11 (5), 36-49
Wong, C. 2012. Toward Building Performance – Oriented Management in China: The critical role of Monitoring and Evaluation and the Long Road Ahead (ECD Working Paper No. 27). The World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 1996. Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines for World Bank – GEF International Waters Projects. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Phiri, M., Lemba., Chomba, M.C. & Kanyamuna, V. (2022) Examining differentials in HIV transmission risk behaviour and its associated factors among men in Southern African countries, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9 (295), 1-12.
World Bank. 1996. Monitoring and Evaluation Guidelines for World Bank–GEF International Water Projects. International Water Series. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2003. A User’s Guide to Poverty and Social Impact Analysis, Poverty Reduction Group. The World Bank, Washington, D.C
World Bank. 2003. A user’s guide to poverty and social impact analysis: The World Bank, Poverty Reduction Group (PRMPR) and Social Development Department (SDV). The World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2012. Designing a Results Framework for achieving Results: A How-To-Guide. IEG, Washington, DC.
Republic of South Africa. 2008. Basic Concepts in Monitoring and Evaluation. Public Service Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vincent Kanyamuna, Francis Simui, Aurick Mubita, Paul Musanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
