Role of Social Science Research in National Development: A Review of Relevant Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.14708Keywords:
policymaking, Social Science, literature, national development, research utilization, knowledge, ZambiaAbstract
There has been increasing pressure on universities to demonstrate the impact of the research they produce. This has involved demonstrating impact through quality measures such as citation counts and journal impact factors. When it comes to the social sciences, the issue of measuring research impact has been regarded as especially challenging, with many analysts claiming that such assessment needs involved both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The research study employed a mixed methodology, drawing on quantitative and qualitative data sources, to investigate whether or not social science research findings had been utilised by policymakers in Zambia, taking the University of Zambia as a case study. Two main research questions were considered in order to structure this inquiry, namely, 1. What is the state of social science research in Zambia? 2. Under what conditions have specific social studies informed policy in Zambia? The study has provided a reflection of the state of social science research in Zambia in terms of the research types that are produced, how the research findings are disseminated, and who the main funders of research were. Additionally, the study also aimed to find out the agendas driving research, whether and how the government utilised social science research findings, the conditions under which social science research had been utilised by policymakers and of course the barriers that hindered research utilisation for social science research in Zambia. Among other things, the study established that some evidence existed that the government utilised some of the research findings from social science research in their policymaking decisions but to a lesser extent than expected. There were barriers to research use by Policy Makers—sustainability of local journals, restrictions in the modes of disseminating research findings, lack of visibility and accessibility of research findings, restrictions in participating in setting of research agendas, as well as lack of mentorship among researchers. Going forward, the research recommends the following: government needs to understand that research is one of the key drivers of development and should funding research; develop national guidelines to provide a framework for equitable participation in research ventures; establish and strengthen linkages between researchers and policymakers; Government should employ technocrats and not political cadres in decision-making positions; and researchers should conduct meaningful research that has policy implications and make deliberate efforts to send policy briefs to policymakers through the ministries and encourage them to use them for the betterment of the country.
References
Day, E., Wadsworth, S.M.D., Bogenschneider, K. & Thomas-Miller, J. 2019. When University Researchers Connect with Policy: A Framework for Whether, When, and How to Engage. Journal of Family Theory and Review. 11(1):165–180..
Fanelli, D. 2010. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLoS ONE. 5(4).
Naveed, A. & Suleri, A.Q. 2015. Making “Impact Factor” Impactful: Universities, Think Tanks and Policy Research in Pakistan Distribution of Multi-Dimensional Poverty in Pakistan View project Making “Impact Factor” Impactful: Universities, Think Tanks and Policy Research in Pakistan Sust. (March). [Online].Website:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arif_Naveed2/publication/299133951_Research-inPakistan.pdf. Accessed on 23 March, 2015.
Ngongalah, L., Niba, R.N., Wepngong, E.N. & Musisi, J.M. 2018. Research challenges in Africa – an exploratory study on the experiences and opinions of African researchers. bioRxiv. 2–4. [Online],Availableat:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/446328v1. Accessed on 22 April, 2020.
Blewden, M., Carroll, P. & Witten, K. 2010. The use of social science research to inform policy development: Case studies from recent immigration policy. Kotuitui. 5(1):13–25.
Soltanisehat, L., Alizadeh, R. & Mehregan, N. 2019. Research and development investment and productivity growth in firms with different levels of technology. Iranian Economic Review. 23(4):795–
Kulakli, A. & Mahony, S. 2014. Knowledge Creation and Sharing with Web 2.0 Tools for Teaching and Learning Roles in So-called University 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 150:648–657.
Wadesango, N. 2014. Publish or Perish: Impediments to Research Output and Publication. Vol. 6. International Journal of Educational Sciences. 6(1):57-63.
Assis, J.L. 2018. Report vannevar bush: science the endless frontiers. Journal of Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences. 3(3):467–470.
Bush, V. 1945. As we may think. The Atlantic. 176(1):101–108
Pielke, R. 2010. In Retrospect: Science — The Endless Frontier. Nature. 466(7309):922–923.
Bhowmik, J., Selim, S.A. & Huq, S. 2017. The Role of Universities in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Dhaka. [Online], Available at: http://www.icccad.net/wpcontent/uploads/2015/12/Policy-Brief-on-role-of-Universities-in-achieving-SDGs.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2018.
Cloete, N., Bailey, T. & Maassen, P. 2011. Universities and economic development in Africa: Pact, academic core and coordination (synthesis report). Cape Town. [Online], Available at: http://chet.org.za/download/file/fid/70. Accessed on 19 June, 2014.
Simukanga, S. 2009. Brain Drain: The University of Zambia Experience. In La Palm Beach Hotel, Accra, Ghana Vice-Chancellor’s Workshop. [Online], Available: ebookbrowse.com/brain-drain-unzaaccessaccra workshop-simukanga.
Cloete, N. & Bunting, I. 2013. Cross-National Performance Indicators: A Case Study of Eight African Universities. Cape Town. [Online], Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl. Accessed on 19 June, 2014
Badat, S. 2009. The role of Higher Education in society: Valuing Higher Education. Saleem Badat HERS -SA Academy. University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business Waterfront , Cape Town.
Masaiti, G. & Mwale, N. 2017. University of Zambia: Contextualization and Contribution to Flagship Status in Zambia BT - Flagship Universities in Africa. In D. Teferra (ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 467–505. Palgrave, Macmillan, Charm.
Mkandawire, S.B. 2020. Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions.Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions. (April).
Lungu, G.F., 1993. Educational Policy-Making in Colonial Zambia: The Case of Higher Education for Africans from 1924 to 1964. The Journal of Negro History, 78(4):.207-232.
Mulenga, F. 2011. ‘Crisis and Successes of the Labour Movement in Zambia: A Historical Perspective.’ Friedrich--Ebert--Stiftung. Lusaka: Friedrich--Ebert--Stiftung. [Online], Availableat: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl. Accessed on 20 November, 2013
Sikwibele, A.L. & Mungoo, J.K. 2009. Distance learning and teacher education in botswana: Opportunities and challenges. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 10(4).
Lockwood, S.J. 1963. Report on the Development of a University in Northern Rhodesia. Lusaka: Government Printers
Frølich, N. 2011. Multi-layered accountability. Performance-based funding of universities. Public Administration. 89(3):840–859..
Kimenyi, M., & Datta, A. (2011). Think tanks in sub-Saharan Africa. How the Political Landscape has influenced their origins. Overseas Development Institute: London
Odia, L.O. & Omofonmwan, S.I. 2013. Research and development initiatives in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 4(2):257–266.
Altbach, J. & Philip, G. 2011. The Road to Academic Excellence. The World Bank.
UNECA. 2015. Economic Report on Africa 2015 | United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. [Online], Available at: http://www.uneca.org/publications/economic-report-africa-2015.
Central Statistical Office Zambia. 2011. Living conditions monitoring survey report 2006 and 2010. Lusaka. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.14708 71
Ministry of Higher Education. 2013. Higher Education Act (the), No. 4 of 2013. Lusaka: National Assembly of Zambia. [Online], Available at: http://www.parliament.gov.zm/sites/default/files/documents/acts/The Higher Education Act%2C 2013.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2018.
Chipeta, J. and Nyambe, I.A., 2012. Publish or Perish: Ushering in UNZA-JABS. JABS, 1(1):1-4. Chitempa, N. 2017. Girl Empowerment and Child Marriage : Empowering girls to prevent and end child marriage in Zambia. 9–57
Ogbodo, C.M., Efanga, S.I. & Ikpe, U.G. 2013. Knowledge production in higher education: Policies and practices in Nigeria. International Education Studies. 6(12):9–14
Sall, E., Lebeau, Y. & Kassimir, R. 2003. The public dimensions of the university in Africa. Journal of Higher Education in Africa/Revue de l'enseignement supérieur en Afrique. 126-148.
Canary, H.E. 2010. Structurating Activity Theory : An Integrative. 20:21–49.
Moahi, K.H. 2010. Promoting African indigenous knowledge in the knowledge economy: Exploring the role of higher education and libraries. In Aslib proceedings: New information perspectives. 64(5):540-554). Online], Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl. Accessed 19 December, 2019.
Cherney, A. & McGee, T.R. 2011. Utilization of social science research: Results of a pilot study among Australian sociologists and criminologists. Journal of Sociology. 47(2):144–162.
Morrison, K. & van der Werf, G. 2016. Research for policy: impact, uptake, or silence? Educational Research and Evaluation. 22(7–8):351–353.
Tseng, V., Gamoran, A., Grant, W.T. & May, F. 2017. Bringing Rigor to Relevant Questions : How Social Science Research Can Improve Youth Outcomes in the Real World. (May)
Prewitt, K., Schwandt, T.A. & Straf, M.L. 2012. Committee on the Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Online], Available at: http://ldihealtheconomist.com/media/using_science_as_evidence%20_in_public_policy.pdf. Accessed on 5 May, 2014.
Van der Vossen, B. 2015. In defense of the ivory tower: Why philosophers should stay out of politics. Philosophical Psychology. 28(7):1045–1063
Hopper, K. 2013. The murky middle ground – When ethnographers engage public health. Social Science & Medicine. 99:201–204.
Tseng, V., Easton, J.Q. & Supplee, L.H., 2017. Research-practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4):1-17.
Backer, T.E. 1991. Knowledge Utilization: The Third Wave. Knowledge. 12(3):225–240.
Carlson, R.A. 1970. Cooperative Extension: a historical assessment. Journal of Extension, 8(3):10-15.
Rogers, E. 1988. The Intellectual Foundation and History of the Agricultural Extension Model. Knowledge. 9(4):492–510.
Heinsch, M., Gray, M. & Sharland, E. 2016. Re-conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work: A literature review on knowledge utilisation. International Journal of Social Welfare.
Rogers, E.M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Ed ed. New York, NY: Free Press.
Ryan, B. & Gross, N.C. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural sociology, 8(1):15
Sahin, I. & Rogers, F. 2006. Detailed Review of Rogers ’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory and Educational Technology-Related Studies Based on Rogers ’. 5(2):14–23.
Alberts, B. 2010. Is the frontier really endless? Science. 330(6011):1587.
Barfield, C. 1997. Science for the Twenty-first Century: The Bush Report Revisited. The American Institute Press. Washington DC.
Li, J.W.H. & Vederas, J.C. 2009. Drug discovery and natural products: End of an era or an endless frontier? Science. 325(5937):161–165.
Coleman, J.S. 1975. Equal Educational Opportunity: A Definition. Oxford Review of Education. 1(1):25–
Weingart, P. 2013. The loss of trust and how to regain it: Performance measures and entrepreneurial universities. Trust in universities (Vol. 86). London: Portland Press Limited. 1-13. [Online], Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-loss-of-trust-and-how-to-regain-it.
Martin, B.R. 2003. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. 7–79. [Online], Available at: https://www.google.com/search?source. Accessed 1 January, 2014.
Graham, I.D., Logan, J., Harrison, M.B., Straus, S.E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W. & Robinson, N. 2006. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.
Henry, G.T. & Mark, M.M. 2003. Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation’s Influence on Attitudes and Actions. American Journal of Evaluation. 24(3):293–314.
Moriarty, J. 2011. Qualitative Methods Review 1. National Institute for Health Research. School for Social Care Research. London. [Online], Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/41199/1/SSCR_Methods_Review_1-1.pdf. Accessed 15 May, 2013.
Cohen, D. K., & Weiss, J. A. 1977. Social science and social policy: Schools and race. In The Educational Forum 41(4): 393-413. Taylor & Francis Group
Lindblom, C.E., Cohen, D.K. & Warfield, J.N. 1980. Usable Knowledge, Social Science and Social Problem Solving. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 10(5):281.
Campbell, D.T. 1979. Assessing the impact of planned social change. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2(1):67–90
Weiss CH. 1979. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review 39: 426–31.
Weiss CH. 1980. Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 1: 381–404.
Boshoff, S.C. 2012. Knowledge utilisation in the South African wine industry (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University). [Online], Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl.Accessed 24 April 2013. 73
Wingens, M. 1990. Toward a General Utilization Theory: A Systems Theory Reformulation of the Two-Communities Metaphor. Knowledge. 12(1):27–42.
Tseng, V. 2012. Commentary on The Uses of Research in Policy and Practice. Social Policy Report.
Caplan, N. 1979. The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization. American Behavioral Scientist. 22(3):459–470.
Dunn, W.N. 1980. The Two-Communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use: An Exploratory Case Survey. Knowledge. 1(4):515–536.
Landry, R., Amara, N. & Lamari, M. 2001a. Climbing the ladder of research utilization: Evidence from social science research. Science Communication. 22(4):396–422
Guyatt, G.H. 1991. Readers’ guide for articles evaluating diagnostic tests: what ACP Journal Club does for you and what you must do yourself. ACP Journal Club. 115(2):A16.
Davies, P.T. 2004. Is Evidence-Based Government Possible? Jerry Lee Lecture. 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquim. 1–30.
Sur, R.L. & Dahm, P. 2011. History of evidence-based medicine. Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. 27(4):487–489.
Blake, S. C. & Ottoson, J. M. 2009. Knowledge utilization: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 124:21–34. [Online], Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ev.311. Accessed 15 June, 2014.
Gray, M., Sharland, E., Heinsch, M. & Schubert, L. 2015. Connecting Research to Action: Perspectives on Research Utilisation. British Journal of Social Work. 45(7):1952–1967.
Estabrooks, C.A., Derksen, L., Winther, C., Lavis, J.N., Scott, S.D., Wallin, L. & Profetto-Mcgrath, J. 2008. The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004. Implementation Science. 3(1):1–22.
Sutcliffe, S. & Court, J. 2005. Evidence-Based Policymaking : What is it ? How does it work ? What relevance for developing countries ? Young. (November):1–50. [Online], Available at: http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/od i-assets/publications-opinion-files/3683.pd. Accessed on 6 May, 2015.
Newman, J. & Head, B. 2015. Beyond the two communities: a reply to Mead’s “why government often ignores research”. Policy Sciences. 48(3):383–393
Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H. M. 1982. The utilization process: A conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1982. (1):591-622.
Bailey, T. & Mouton, J. 2005. A review of models of research utilisation
Grimshaw, J.M., Eccles, M.P., Lavis, J.N., Hill, S.J. & Squires, J.E. 2012. Knowledge Translation Of Research Findings BT - Effective Dissemination of Findings from Research. Implementation Science. 7(50):1–17
Govind, M. & Küttim, M. 2016. International Knowledge Transfer from University to Industry: A Systematic Literature Review. Research in Economics and Business: Central and Eastern Europe. 8(2).
Wahab, S.A., Rose, R.C. & Osman, S.I.W. 2011. Defining the Concepts of Technology and Technology Transfer: A Literature Analysis. International Business Research. 5(1):61–71. 74
Green, L.W., Ottoson, J.M. & Hiatt, R.A. 2014. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization and integration. Frontiers in public health services & systems research. 3(1):3.
Greenhalgh, T. & Russell, J. 2009. Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 52(2):304–318
Davies, H., Nutley, S. & Walter, I. 2008. Why “knowledge transfer” is misconceived for applied social research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 13(3):188–190.
Larsen, J.K. 1980. Review Essay : Knowledge Utilization: What Is It? Knowledge. 1(3):421–442.
W Weiss, C. H. 1978. Broadening Concept of Research Utilization. In Vol. 21 In Sociological Symposium. 20–33. [Online], Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl. Accessed on 20 April, 2014.
Boswell, C. & Smith, K. 2017. Rethinking policy “impact”: Four models of research-policy relations. Palgrave Communications. 3(1).
Belkhodja, O. 2014. Knowledge Utilization in Canadian Health Service Organizations: A Path Analysis. International Journal of Public Administration. 37(6):339–352.
Belkhodja, O., Amara, N., Landry, R. & Ouimet, M. 2007. The Extent and Organizational Determinants of Research Utilization in Canadian Health Services Organizations. Science Communication. 28(3):377–
Jbilou, J., Amara, N. & Landry, R. 2007. Research-based-decision-making in Canadian Health Organizations: A behavioural approach. Journal of Medical Systems. 31(3):185–196
Lester, J.P. 1993. The Utilization of Policy Analysis by State Agency Officials. Knowledge. 14(3):267– 290.
Rich, R.F. 1997. Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes. Knowledge and Policy.
Cherney, A., Head, B., Boreham, P., Povey, J. & Ferguson, M. 2011. The Utilisation of Social Science Research in Policy Development and Program Review. Preliminary Report: Phase 1 Results. Queensland. [Online], Available at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl. Accessed 17 May, 2014
Albaek, E. 1995. Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making. Policy sciences, 28(1): 79-100.
Lomas, J. 1993. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 703(1):226–237
Lomas, J. 1990. Finding Audiences, Changing Beliefs: The Structure of Research Use in Canadian Health Policy. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 15(3):525–542.
Yin, R.K. & Moore, G.B. 1988. Lessons on the utilization of research from nine case experiences in the natural hazards field. Knowledge in Society. 1(3):25–44
Frenk, J. 1992. Balancing relevance and excellence: Organizational responses to link research with decision making. Social Science & Medicine. 35(11):1397–1404.
Silversides, A. 1997. Dissemination of research results to clinicians an art in itself. Cmaj. 156(12):1746–1747.
Landry, R., Amara, N. & Lamari, M. 2001b. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy. 30(2):333–349. 75
Kothari, A., Birch, S. & Charles, C. 2005. “Interaction” and research utilisation in health policies and programs: Does it work? Health Policy. 71(1):117–125.
Oh, C.H. 1997. Explaining the impact of policy information on policy-making. Knowledge and Policy.
Huberman, M. 1987. Steps toward an integrated model of research tilization. Knowledge, 8(4): 586611.
Lomas, J. 1997. Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: beyond the sound of one hand clapping. Hamilton: Centre for health economics and policy analysis, McMaster University
Grindle, M.S. & Thomas, J.. 1991. Public choices and policy change: the political economy of reform in developing countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
Weiss, C. H. 1991. Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con. Knowledge and Policy. 4(1):37–55.
Bogenschneider, K. & Corbett, T.J. 2010. Family policy: Becoming a field of inquiry and subfield of social policy. Journal of Marriage and Family. 72(3):783–803.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Felistus Moyo, Vincent Kanyamuna, Aurick Mubita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
