Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Arrangements in Zambia’s Public Sector: Shifting Sands or a Solid Rock?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1011.15905Keywords:
planning, budgeting, implementation, monitoring, evaluation, M&E, national development plans, ZambiaAbstract
The paper asks a prime question: Are Zambia’s Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation arrangements Shifting Sands or a Solid Rock? The country, through its policy and legislative instruments has in the recent years articulated and adopted clear frameworks for national planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation of public interventions. However, despite these efforts, there still remain a lot of critical questions unanswered. Do the current planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation arrangements address Zambia’s development agenda? Are different development plans at national, line ministry, provincial and district level aligned towards a streamlined effort to alleviate the country out of abject poverty? Is there evidence that national annual budgets are directly derived from programmes and activities from various development plans at line ministry, provincial and district levels? Can we track programmes in national development plans (NDPs) within annual budgets? In the literature reviewed, answers to these questions are mixed. While other questions are in the affirmative, many of them have weak evidence. There are strong indications that Zambia’s frameworks for planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation would require restructuring to remove redundancies, repetitions and unnecessary bureaucracies. Even when the policies and legislation are clear on what plan needed to be developed and implemented at various levels, in many cases, these remain in draft forever or worse off non-existent. These challenges are more prominent at decentralised levels where plans and M&E practices are weak and fragmented a great deal. Many plans have been prescribed at provincial and district level, yet they are not actualised. They cause staff fatigue on one hand while crowding-out development evidence on the other hand. Therefore, it is recommended that a detailed study is undertaken, one that take the form of a readiness assessment to map out what plans, M&E arrangements and budget frameworks are working well, not working well and reasons why. Such a report will be a good starting point to reform the planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation architecture for Zambia. A focused approach will be sound and will lead to a predictable and sustainable development agenda for the country.
References
Bamberger, M. 1991. The politics of evaluation in developing countries. Evaluation and Program Planning, 14 (1): 325–339.
Kanyamuna, V. & Kone, Y,D, Z. Reforming the Public Financial Management System for Better Performance Budgeting in Ivory Coast, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (8), 101-121, 2022.
Bamberger, M. 2008. Enhancing the utilisation of evaluations for evidence-based policy- making. In M. Segone (Ed.). Bridging the Gap. Switzerland: UNICEF.
Bamberger, M. 2010. Institutionalising Impact Evaluation. A key element in strengthening country-led monitoring and evaluation systems. In M. Segone (Ed.). From Policies to Results: Developing capacities for country monitoring and evaluation systems. Geneva: UNICEF.
Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D.A., Munsanda, P., Zulu, K. (2021) Diagnosis of the Indicator Methodology for Zambia’s Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 10(12): 46-56.
Bedi, T., Coudouel, A., Cox, M., Goldstein, M. & Thornton, N. 2006. Beyond the numbers: Understanding the institutions for monitoring poverty reduction strategies. The World Bank.Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., Kotzé, D. A. & Phiri, M. “Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: The Missing Strand in the African Transformational Development Agenda.” World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2019. 5(3): 160-175.
Kanyamuna, V. Analysis of Zambia’s Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System in the context of National Development Plans. Doctorate Thesis. University of South Africa, 2019.
Bemelemans-Videc, Marie-Louise, Rist, R. C. & Vedung, E. (Eds.). 2007. Carrots, Sticks and Sermons: Policy Instruments and their Evaluation. New York: Transaction Publishers.
Booth, D. & Lucas, H. 2002. Good Practice in the Development of PRSP Indicators and Monitoring Systems, ODI Working Paper 172. Overseas Development Institute, London.
Bossert, T., Chitah, M. B. & Bowser, D. 2003. Decentralisation in Zambia: Resource Allocation and District Performance. Health Policy and Planning, 18(4): 357–369.
Kanyamuna, V. (2021). Towards Building a Functional Whole-of-Government Monitoring and Evaluation System for Zambia: The Supply Side. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(8). 163-195.
Briceno, B. 2010. Defining the Type of M&E system: Clients, Intended uses and actual utilisation. Prem Notes, Special series on the Nuts and Bolts of M&E systems. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Cammack, D. 2007. The Logic of African Neopatrimonialism: What Role for Donors? Development Policy Review, 25 (5): 599-614.
Castro, M. F. 2009. Insider Insights: Building a Results-Based Management and Evaluation System in Colombia. ECD Working Paper 18, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., Chawapiwa, O. & Bwanga, C. The Effectiveness of Service Delivery in Fast Moving Consumer Goods Supply Value Chain: A Case Study of Brands Africa Zambia Limited Company, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10 (2), 420- 446, 2023.
Görgens, M. & Kusek, J. 2009. Making Monitoring and Evaluation Systems Work: A Capacity Development Toolkit. IBRD World Bank, Washington DC.
GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2002. Zambia poverty reduction strategy paper (2002–2004), March 2002. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2006. Fifth National Development Plan 2006-2010: Broad based wealth and job creation through citizenry participation and technological advancement, Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
Kanyamuna, V., KONE, Y, D, Z. & Mubita, A. Linking Budget and Policies: The Case of Ivory Coast, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (4), 244-266, 2022.
GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2010. Sixth National Development Plan 2011-2015: Sustained Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2014b. National Planning and Budgeting Policy: Responsive, transparent, accountable and results-oriented Development Planning and Budgeting processes. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
GRZ. Ministry of Finance and National Planning. 2014d. Revised Sixth National Development Plan 2013-2016: People Centred Economic Growth and Development – Volume I. Lusaka: Ministry of Finance and National Planning.
Moyo, F., Kanyamuna, V. & Mubita, A. Role of Social Science Research in National Development: A Review of Relevant Literature, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 10 (6), 42-76, 2023.
GRZ. Office of the President, Cabinet Office. 2002. The National Decentralisation Policy: Towards empowering the people. Lusaka: Cabinet Office.
Morra Imas, L. G. & Rist, R. C. 2009. The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Mouton, C. 2010. The History of Programme Evaluation in South Africa. MPhil Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Pretoria.
World Bank. 2003d. Toward Country-led Development: A Multi-Partner Evaluation of the Comprehensive Development Framework—Synthesis Report. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Bwanga, C., Kanyamuna, V. & Qutieshat, A. Effect of Leadership and Performance Management on Public Service Delivery in Zambia, World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9 (2), 48-56, 2023.
World Bank. 2004a. Evaluation Capacity Development—Monitoring and Evaluation: Some Tools, Methods and Approaches. OED, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2006. Conducting Quality Impact Evaluations under Budget, Time and Data Constraints, IEG, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., KONE, Y, D, Z. & Mubita, A. Evaluation of Budget Execution Process in Ivory Coast, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, (IJHSSI) 11 (5), 36-49, 2022.
World Bank. 2007a. Results-Based National Development Strategies: Assessment and Challenges Ahead— Review Paper. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2007b. Results-Based National Development Strategies Assessment and Challenges Ahead. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
Kanyamuna, V., Siakalima, S., Phiri-Mumba, R. & Munsanda, P. Understanding Research Methods in Development Context: A Synthesis Paper on Research in Development Arenas, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9 (1), 349-358, 2022.
World Bank. 2008. World Development Indicators. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
World Bank. 2009. Institutionalising Impact Evaluation within the framework of a Monitoring and Evaluation System. IEG. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
World Bank. 2012a. Designing a Results Framework for achieving Results: A How-To-Guide. IEG, Washington, DC.
World Bank. 2012b. Improving the Quality of Public Expenditure through the use of Performance Information in Mexico. IEG, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Kanyamuna, V. & Sibalwa, G. An Investigation of Factors that Contribute to Qualified External Audit Reports at The University of Zambia, Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 10 (1), 279-301, 2023.
Wotela, K. 2017. A proposed Monitoring and Evaluation Curriculum based on a model that institutionalises monitoring and evaluation. African Evaluation Journal, 5(1): 1-8. 412
Kanyamuna, V., Mubita, A., Ng’andu, E., Mizinga, C. & Mwale, A. 2018. An Assessment of the Demand-Side of the Monitoring and Evaluation System of the Health Sector in Zambia. World Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2018. 4(2): p. 75–86.
Zaltsman, A. 2006. Experience with Institutionalizing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems In Five Latin American Countries: Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Uruguay (ECD Working Paper 16 No. 16). Washington, D.C. The World Bank.
Siakalima, S. & Kanyamuna, V. Community Schooling System in Zambia: Its Evolution and Stakeholder Perspectives, American Journal of Educational Research, 10 (9), 571-578, 2022.
Mulonda, M., Kanyamuna, V. & Kanenga, H. State–Civil Society relationship in Zambia, International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 2018. 3(4): p. 17-26.
Kanyamuna, V. 2013. Sector Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in the context of Poverty Reduction Strategies: A comparative case study of Zambia’s Health and Agriculture sectors. MSc–dissertation, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
GRZ. Ministry of National Development Planning. 2017. Seventh National Development Plan (7NDP 2017-2021), Accelerating Development Efforts towards Vision 2030 without Leaving Anyone Behind (Vol. 1). Lusaka: Ministry of National Development Planning.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Vincent Kanyamuna, Brivery Siamabele, Million Phiri, Aurick Mubita, Valentine Kalonje
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
