School District Superintendents as Transformational Leaders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1111.17876Keywords:
Superintendent, Transformational, Leadership, Reform, InstructionAbstract
The educational reform movement in the United States (1983-2024) presented school district superintendents with a wide array of challenges and opportunities. Initially, state and federal policymakers’ called for draconian school and district level accountability and endorsed he notion of top-down management. However, the reality of implementing district-wide, systemic changes focused on improving student learning outcomes influenced a shift in superintendents’ role from manager to teacher-scholar. During the last decade, researchers examined the role of superintendents in Instructionally Effective School Districts (IESD) and reported that they used their managerial prerogatives to initiate and sustain district-wide instructional improvement (Bjork, 2024). Research findings suggest that their involvement hiring and supervising teachers, evaluating principals, clearly articulating instructional and curricular goals, monitoring instructional improvement and, engaging in long-term financial planning for instruction indirectly influence the quality of learning and teaching. Findings from this longitudinal case study extend our understanding of how superintendents’ enact their role as teacher-scholar help to explain their success. Key elements of Transformational Leadership including idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and, individual consideration provided considerable insight into how they enacted their role. In addition, findings suggest that over time followers at different levels of the school district’s organization (teachers, principals and central office staffs) adopted Transformational Leadership dispositions and practices suggesting that it may be viewed as being both multidimensional and multi-directional. These findings may expand our understanding of how superintendents’ transformational leadership may influence the development of professional cultures and enhance student learning.
References
Anderson, E., & Young, M. (2018). A research-based framework for district effectiveness. UCEA Review, 59(3), 1-11.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, (3), 19-32.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bjork, L. (2024). The Instructional Leadership Role of Superintendents in Instructionally Effective School Districts. The Paris Conference on Arts & Humanities, Paris France: June 16, 2024.
Bjork, L. (2018, May). The Role of School District Superintendents in Creating Professional Learning Communities. International Journal of Management and Applied Science (IJMAS). Vol 4(7), 68-72. st
Björk, L. G. (2001). The role of the central office in decentralization. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21 century challenges for school administrators (pp.286-309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). Introduction-International Perspectives on Educational Reform and Superintendent Leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 13(4), 357-361.
Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp.163-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2018). Superintendent roles as CEO and Team leader. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 179-205.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Potterton, A. U. (2019). Educational reform in the United States: Superintendents role in promoting social justice through organizational justice. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education: Educational reform in the United States. New York, NY: Springer.
Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73-96.
Björk, L., Kowalski, T., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2005). Learning theory and research: A framework for changing superintendent preparation and development. In Björk, L. & Kowalski, T. (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: preparation, practice and development, (pp. 71-106). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press
Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Brunner, C. C., Grogan, M., & Björk, L. G. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining st leadership for the 21 century (pp. 211-238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper, Torchbooks.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative nd research (3 edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J. W. & J.D. Creswell (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches th (6 edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Covey, S. M. R. (2022). Trust and inspire. Simon and Schuster.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Elmore. R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
Filstead, W. J. (1979). Qualitative Methods: A Needed Perspective in Evaluation Research. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and QuantitativeMethods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Fusarelli, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendents as social scientists and social activists. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 187-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 1-19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-452.
Guba, E. & Y. Lincoln (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA.: American Association of School Administrators.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (2017) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge, New York.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Kowalski, T. J., & Keedy, J. L. (2005). Preparing superintendents to be effective communicators. In L. G. Björk & T.
J. Kowalski (Eds.), School district superintendents: Role expectations, professional preparation, development and licensing (pp. 207-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. 140 Bjork, L. G. (2024). School District Superintendents as Transformational Leaders. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(11). 129-141.
Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2011). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education. th
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. & J. Soldana (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis, 4 Ed. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.
Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications
Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Senge, P. (2000). Schools that learn. A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
Schlechty, P. (1990). Schools for the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.`
Tienken, C. H. (2021). The American Superintendent 2020 Decennial Study. Lanham MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Thayer, L. O. (1961). Administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lars G. Bjork
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
