The Instructional Leadership Role of Superintendents in Instructionally Effective School Districts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1110.17791Keywords:
Superintendent, Leadership, Roles, Reform, InstructionAbstract
Throughout the past four decades (1983-2024), the rise of a global economy and the changing nature of American society underscored the importance of educating all children. Successive waves of education reform in the United States of America (USA) launched a wide array of initiatives focused on improving student learning. These state and federal policy initiatives were accompanied by an historic shift in role expectations of school district superintendents. An examination of trend data reported in three successive nation-wide reports released by the American Association of School Administrators (AASA) for the years 2000, 2010 and 2020 (Glass, Björk & Brunner, 2000; Kowalski, et al., 2011; Tienken, 2021) suggest that role expectations for district superintendents moved from away from an emphasis on management to a focus on instructional leadership. In addition, findings on superintendent instructional leadership practices in Instructionally Effective School Districts (IESD) reported by Bjork (1993, 2010, 2024) and Bjork & Browne-Ferrigno (2014) note that they effectively used their managerial position to support district-wide instructional improvement. They found that superintendents serving in IESD school districts used enacted their management responsibilities in areas that would indirectly influence the quality of learning and teaching including: (1) Staff selection and recruitment; (2) Principal supervision and evaluation; (3) Establishing clear instructional and curricular goals; (4) Monitoring learning and curricular improvement activities and, (5) Financial planning for instruction. These findings suggest that IESD superintendents’ use their management prerogatives to enact their instructional leadership role and reframe school district leadership for deeper learning in next generation schools.
References
Anderson, E., & Young, M. (2018). A research-based framework for district effectiveness. UCEA Review, 59(3), 1-11.
Björk, L. (1993). Effective schools-effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of School Leadership, 3(3), 246-259.
Björk, L. G. (2001). The role of the central office in decentralization. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenges for school administrators (pp.286-309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Bjork, L. (2024). The Instructional Leadership Role of Superintendents in Instructionally Effective School Districts. The Paris Conference on Arts & Humanities, Paris France: June 16, 2024.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). Introduction-International Perspectives on Educational Reform and Superintendent Leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools. 13(4), 357-361.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2018). Superintendent roles as CEO and Team leader. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 179-205. 384
Bjork, L. G. (2024). The Instructional Leadership Role of Superintendents in Instructionally Effective School Districts. Advances in Social Sciences
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Potterton, A. U. (2019). Educational reform in the United States: Superintendents role in promoting social justice through organizational justice. In R. Papa (Ed.), Handbook on promoting social justice in education: Educational reform in the United States. New York, NY: Springer.
Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp.163-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Björk, L., & Lindle, J. C. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76-91.
Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Björk, L. G. (2018). Reflections on education reform and team leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 339-347.
Brunner, C. C., Grogan, M., & Björk, L. G. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 211-238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper, Torchbooks.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Chance, P. L., & Björk, L. G. (2004). The social dimensions of public relations. In T. J. Kowalski (Ed.), Public relations in schools (3rd ed., pp.125-148). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Every Student Succeeds Act, Pub. L. 114-95—114th Congress (2015).
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803-813.
Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA.: American Association of School Administrators.
Howlett, P. (1993). The politics of school leaders, past and future. Education Digest, 58(9), 18-21.
Kochan, F. K., Jackson, B. L., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line: A study of educational leaders, their jobs, their preparation and the problems they face. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
Kowalski, T.J. (1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73-96.
Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2011). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.
Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office. 385 No Child Left Behind, H. R. 1—107th Congress (2002).
Noam Cook, S. D., & Yanow, D. (1993). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2(4), 373-390.
Popova-Nowak, I. V., & Cseh, M. (2015). The meaning of organizational learning: A meta-paradigm perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 299-331.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Rost, J.C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Schlechty, P. (1990). Schools for the 21st century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tienken, C. H. (2021). The American Superintendent 2020 Decennial Study. Lanham MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lars G. Bjork
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
