The Factors Influencing Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) Among Employees at Malaysia Airport Holding Berhad, Terminal Service Division, Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Malaysia

Authors

  • Nurul Aida Natasha Rusli Universiti Teknologi Mara, Puncak Alam, Malaysia
  • Maliza Delima Kamarul Zaman Universiti Teknologi Mara, Puncak Alam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16406

Keywords:

Innovative work behavior, Transformational leadership, Person-organizational fit, Perceived organizational support, psychological well-being

Abstract

Innovative work behaviour (IWB) among employees has parallel increase in priority for employees that have concern in quality of work and to increase employees’ satisfaction. It is not anymore, a new thing to a working world. Thus, this research analysed the factors affecting employees’ innovative work behaviour at Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad. The research examined the relationship between transformational leadership, person-organizational fit, perceived organizational support, psychological well-being, as well as interpersonal conflict and IWB. Therefore, a framework and six hypotheses were developed. A total of 74 respondents of Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad (MAHB), Terminal Service Division (TSD), Kuala Lumpur International Airport participated in this study which was conducted through online Google Form. Quantitative research was conducted using cross-sectional method by distributing verified questionnaire. The data obtained for this study was analysed with Statistical Package for Social Science (Version 28.0). The findings indicated that transformational leadership, person-organizational fit, perceived organizational support, and psychological well-being had significant impacts on IWB. However, there was no relationship between interpersonal conflict and innovative work behaviour. It was also analysed that the most significant factor was Person-organization fit. Therefore, the organization and employees of Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad, Terminal Service Division (TSD), Kuala Lumpur International Airport were hoped to concentrate on Person-organizational fit to enhance innovative work behaviour thus improve performance.

References

Jankelova, N, Joniakova, N & Misun, J. (2021) Innovative Work Behavior—A Key Factor in Business Performance? The Role of Team Cognitive Diversity and Teamwork Climate in This Relationship. Journal Risk Financial Management (14) 185.

The Star (2019). https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2018/02/20/mahb-upgradingbaggage-system-at-klia/

Latif, T., Qadeer, F. & Farooqi, S. (2020). Individual innovative behavior: Interplay of reputation, job requirement and expected positive performance outcomes. Asian Management Research Journal, 3.

Choi, S.-W. Kang, S-W & Choi, S., B. (2021). Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: An Empirical Study of Moderated Mediation Model of Self-Efficacy, Perceived Organizational Support, and Leader–Member Exchange. Behavioural Science, 1.

Sari, D., K, Yudiarso, A. & Sinambela, F., C. (2021). Work Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior: Meta-Analysis Study. Proceedings of the International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPSYCHE 2020), 359.

Shah S.T.H. Shah S. M. A & El-Gohary, H. (2022). Nurturing Innovative Work Behaviour through Workplace Learning among Knowledge Workers of Small and Medium Businesses. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

Riaz, S, Xu, Y, & Hussain, S. (2018). Understanding Employee Innovative Behavior and Thriving at Work: A Chinese Perspective. Administrative Science, 2.

Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad (2022). Annual Report 2022.

Yee, E. (2022, December). TM R&D Awarded with the Innovative Tech Companies of the Year. Retrieved from Business Today: https://www.businesstoday.com.

Luu, T. T. (2021). Can human resource flexibility disentangle innovative work behavior among hospitality employees? The roles of harmonious passion and regulatory foci. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 4258-4285.

AlShamsi, K. Z. (2022). The relationship between curiosity and innovative work behavior in the aviation industry: the mediating effect of work engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1934-8835.

Malaysian Science and Technology Information Centre (2022). https://mastic.mosti.gov.my/ 172

AlEssa H., S. &. Durugbo. C., M. (2021). Systematic review of innovative work behavior concepts and contributions. Management Review Quarterly.

Alqatawenh, A. S. (2018). Transformational Leadership Style and Its Relationship with Change Management.

Takaya, R., Arsil, & Ramli, A. H. (2020). Perceived Organizational Support and Turnover Intention. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 151.

Priambodo, A., Prokoso, B., B & Setyorini (2021). Correlation Between Psychological Well-being and Satisfaction of Life on Physical Education Teachers. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, (6180.

Hasanudin, S., Safar, F. M., Saaidun, S., N., S. Abdullah, N., A., N. (2022). Job Demand, Interpersonal Conflict and Occupational Mental Health: A Case Survey in Private College in Northern Region of Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2040– 2049.

Sudibjo & Parameswari. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. HELIYON

Koroglu and Ozmen. (2021). The mediating effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior and the role of psychological well-being in the job demands–resources (JD-R) model.

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size and Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 607-610.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-06

How to Cite

Rusli, N. A. N., & Zaman, M. D. K. (2024). The Factors Influencing Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) Among Employees at Malaysia Airport Holding Berhad, Terminal Service Division, Kuala Lumpur International Airport, Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(2.2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16406

Most read articles by the same author(s)