The Impact of Active Methodologies and External Examination on Students' Motivation

Authors

  • Isabel Ribau Coutinho Department of Applied Social Sciences, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA Lisbon University, Portugal Interdisciplinary Centre of Social Sciences CICS.NOVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.15893

Keywords:

Motivation, external examination, learning Chemistry and Physics, flipped classroom, laboratory station class

Abstract

Assessment plays a significant role in the learning and teaching process. In Portugal, external examinations are vital to students' transition to the higher education system. To access engineering, science, and health courses is mandatory to do the national examination for “Physics Chemistry A” which occurs after 11.º grade. Grounded on the social cognitive perspective, the research's main goal was to analyze the impact of the laboratory station methodology and flipped classrooms on the motivation and resilience to continue in the science field and to perceive the impact of external examination on motivation. The data analysis allows us to conclude that this teaching and learning methodology plays a significant role in the maintenance of motivation. Secondly, data showed a positive effect of the intervention on student performance. Thirdly the external examination frames students’ motivation guide type. Fourth, these active methodologies consolidate the student’s learning strategies and are reflected in the external examination.

References

Adegoke, B. (2010). A survey of examination: Malpractice among secondary school students-causes, effects, and solutions. Retrieved from https://www.grin.com/document/178869

Aftab, A., Qureshi, S., & William, I. (2014). Investigating the washback effect of the Pakistani Intermediate English Examination. International Journal of English and Literature, 5(7), 149–154. doi:10.5897/IJEL2013.0521.

Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2016). The classmate’s social isolation questionnaire (CSIQ): An initial validation. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 264–274. doi:10.1080/ 17405629.2016.1152174

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), pp. 261-271.

Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student’s learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (3), pp. 260-267.

Anderman, E., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in personal achievement goals and the perceived classroom goal structures across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, pp. 269-298.

Anderman, E.M., & Wolters, C. (2006). Goals, Values, and Affect. In P. Alexander and P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 369-390). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Betz, N. E. (2007). Career self-efficacy: Exemplary recent research and emerging directions. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(4), 403-422.

Boekaerts, M., and Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention. Appl. Psychol. 54, 199–231. doi 10.1111/j. 1464-0597.2005. 00205.x

Borghouts, L. B., Slingerland, M., & Haerens, L. (2017). Assessment quality and practices in secondary PE in the Netherlands. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(5), 473–489. doi:10.1080/17408989.2016.1241226

Bouffard, T., Boisvert, J., Vezeau, C., & Larouche, C. (1995). The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 317-329.

Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Amieiro, N., Valle, A., Rosário, P., and Núñez, J. C. (2019). The mediating role of selfefficacy and perceived usefulness between strategy knowledge and its use. Rev. Psicodidáct. 24, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.psicoe. 2018.09.001

Cordeiro, P. M. (2010). Construção e validação do Questionário de Motivação Escolar Para a população portuguesa: Estudos exploratórios [Construction and validation of School Motivation Questionnaire for the Portuguese population: Exploratory studies]. (Master thesis dissertation). Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal.

Cordeiro, P. M., Figueira, C. A. P., da Silva, J. T.& Matos, L. (2012). School Motivation Questionnaire for the Portuguese Population: Structure and Psychometric Studies the Spanish Journal of Psychology, vol. 15 (3), 2012, 1441-1455. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Coutinho, I. Ribau. (2022). Teaching and Learning Chemistry and Physics with a Laboratory Stations Model in a Flipped Classroom – A Preliminary Report. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(9). 73-104.

Crede, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 337–346. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002

Dawe, H. (2020). Learning achievement goal theory and teaching students legal problem-solving. The Law Teacher,54 (2), 249-260.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, pp. 227-268.

Demo, P. (2004). Teacher of the Future and Knowledge Reconstruction. London, U.K.: Voices, 2004.

Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, pp. 169-189.

Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York: Guilford.

Ribau, I. (2023). The Impact of Active Methodologies and External Examination on Students' Motivation. Advances in Social Sciences Research

Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (3), pp. 461-475.

Froiland, J. M., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school. Psychology in the Schools, 53(3), 321–336.

Ghezzi JFSA, Higa EFR, Lemes MA, Marin MJS. Strategies of active learning methodologies in nursing education: an integrative literature review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(1): e20200130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-

Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafreniere, M. K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15, 77–95

Goldstein, H., & Leckie, G. (2016). Trends in examination performance and exposure to standardised tests in England and Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 367–375. doi:10.1002/berj.3220

Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., Oliver, P. H., & Guerin, D. W. (2007). Multivariate latent change modelling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 317–327.

Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, pp. 187-194.

Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children’s learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (5), pp. 890-898.Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 29-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N.M., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A.D., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of Stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232 - 246.

Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113-125

Husman, J., Derryberry, W., Crowson, H. & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic motivation:

Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (2004) 63-76.

Islam, M. S. (2016). The dilemma of the high-stake public examination for primary education in Bangladesh: Can decentralization help? Bangladesh Education Journal, 15(2), 47–52.

Jesus, S., & Lens, W. (2005). An integrated model for the study of teacher motivation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, pp. 119-134.

Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-53). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2014). Erratum to: The negative influences of exam-oriented education on Chinese high school students: Backwash from classroom to child. Language Testing in Asia, 4(1), 2. doi:10.1186/ 2229-0443-4-2

Lau, C. & Tam, C. (2017). The perfect marriage? –Language and art criticism in the Hong Kong public examination context. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(1), 61–70. doi:10.1111/jade.12071

Lens, W. (2001). How to combine intrinsic task motivation with the motivational 87 effects of the instrumentality of present tasks for future goals. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 23-36). Dordrecht, Nederlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Lens, W. (2006). Etudiez bien à l’école, c’est important pour votre avenir: conséquences motivationnelles de la perception de l’utilité [Study hard at school, it is important for your future: Motivational effects of perceived utility]. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 27, 117-133.

Lens, W. (2009). Motivation in Education: Enjoying the present while striving for the future. Coimbra presentation handouts.

Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2006). Motivation: About the “why” and “what for” of human behaviour. In K. Pawlik & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.), Psychological concept: An international historical perspective (pp. 249-270). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Lens, W., Herrera, D., & Lacante, M. (2004). The role of motivation and future time perspective in educational counselling. Psychologica, 43, 169-180.

Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196.

Li, Lu, Andrew D. I. Gow, and Jaixian Zhou. (2020) “The Role of Positive Emotions in Education: A Neuroscience Perspective.” Mind, Brain, and Education 14,3, 220–234.

Lima, L. (1997). O paradigma da educação contábil: políticas educativas e perspetivas gerencialistas no ensino superior em Portugal. Revista Brasileira De Educação, Nº 4, 43-59. Retrieved on 25 June 2023 from http://educa.fcc.org.br/pdf/rbedu/n04/n04a05.pdf

Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder: Westview Press.

Manganelli, S., Cavicchiolo, E., Mallia, L., Biasi, V., Lucidi, F. & Alivernini, F. (2019). The interplay between selfdetermined motivation, self-regulated cognitive strategies, and prior achievement in predicting academic performance, Educational Psychology, 39:4, 470-488, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2019.1572104 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1572104

Marchak, D. & Shvarts-Serebro, I. (2021). 14 The Multidisciplinary Learning Grid: A Conceptual Space to Develop Neuropedagogy-based, Arts-integrated Chemistry Activities. In L. Bigon & N. Shaked (Ed.), The Arts of the Grid: Interdisciplinary Insights on Gridded Modalities in Conversation with the Arts (pp. 204-224). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733228-017

Marchak, Debora, Inna Shvarts-Serebro, and Ron Blonder. (2021). “Crafting Molecular Geometries: Implications of Neuro-Pedagogy for Teaching Chemical Content.” Journal of Chemical Education (2021), online source. Accessed March 15, 2021. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00306

Marchak, Debora, Inna Shvarts-Serebro, and Ron Blonder. (2022) “Teaching Chemistry by a Creative Approach: Adapting a Teachers’ Course for Active Remote Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education

Mark, M.M., Donaldson, S.I., & Campbell, B. (2011). Social psychology and evaluation: Building a better future. In M.M. Mark, S.I. Donaldson, & B. Campbell (Eds.), Social psychology and evaluation. New York: Guilford.

Matos, L. (2005). School culture, teacher´s and student´s achievement goals as communicating vessels: A study in Peruvian Secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Leuven, Belgium.

Matos, L., Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2007). Achievement goals, Learning strategies and language achievement among Peruvian high school students. Psychologica Belgica, 47 (1/2), pp. 51-70.

Matos, L., Lens, W., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2009). School culture matters for teachers’ and students’ achievement goals. In A. Kaplan, S. Karabenick, & E. De Groot (Eds.), Culture, self, and motivation: Essays in honour of Martin L. Maehr (pp. 161-181). Information Age.

Mccormick, M. J., & Martinko, M. J. (2004). Identifying leader social cognitions: Integrating the causal reasoning perspective into social cognitive theory. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 2-11.

Midgley, C. (Ed.). (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. A. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9-33. http;//dx.doi.org/10.1023/B: EDPR.0000012343.96370.39

Moran, J. (2017). Active methodologies and hybrid models in education, New Digital Technologies: Reflections on Mediation, Learning and Development, S. Yaegashi et al., Eds. Curitiba, Brazil: CRV, 2017, pp. 23–35. Accessed: Jun. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://www2.eca.usp. br/moran/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/Metodológicas_Ativas.pdf

Nabavi, R. & Bijandi; M. (2012). Bandura's Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory. Retrieved on 25 July from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267750204

Nicholls, J.G. (1984). Conceptions of ability and achievement motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education: Vol. 1. Student Motivation (pp. 39–73). New York: Academic Press.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in the Classroom Applying Self-Determination Theory to Educational Practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Núñez. J. & León, J. (2019) Determinants of classroom engagement: a prospective test based on self-determination theory, Teachers, and Teaching, 25:2, 147-159, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1542297.

Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102 (1), pp. 35-58.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, pp. 92-104.

Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16: 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), pp. 33-40.

Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classrooms (pp. 149-183). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Pintrich, Smith, Garcia & McKeachie (1991) Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.15893 131

Rau, Martina A. (2017). “Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 29, 4, 717–761.

Reddy, K., Haritsa, S.V., Rafiq, A. (2021). Importance of Brain-Based Learning in Effective Teaching Process. In: Thomas, K.A., Kureethara, J.V., Bhattacharyya, S. (eds) Neuro-Systemic Applications in Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72400-9_14.

Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Students’ classroom engagement produces longitudinal changes in classroom motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 527–540. Reeve, J., & Lee, W. (2018). Motivational neuroscience. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing high school students’ engagement by increasing their teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.

Rehmani, A. (2003). Impact of public examination system on teaching and learning in Pakistan. International Biannual Newsletter ANTRIEP, 8(2), 3–7.

Ribau, I. (2020). Practical Work by Laboratory Stations, an Innovation in Experimental Work. Universal Journal of Educational Research. Vol 8 (1), 17-26. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080103

Ribau, I. (2022). Engaging Students in Chemistry and Physics with an Active Methodology. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(12), 488–508. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13708

Ribeiro, M. I. C. & Passos, O. M. (2020). A Study on the Active Methodologies Applied to Teaching and Learning Process in the Computing Area. Ieee Access, [S.L.], 8, 219083- 219097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3036976.

Rind, I. & Mari, M. (2019) Analysing the impact of external examination on teaching and learning of English at the secondary level education, Cogent Education, 6:1, 1574947, DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1574947

Rosário, P., Lourenço, A., Paiva, M. O., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., and Valle, A. (2012). Self-efficacy and perceived utility as necessary conditions for self-regulated academic learning. Anal. Psychol. 28, 37–44

Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Nuñez, J. C., Pienda, J., Solano, P., and Valle, A. (2007). Evaluating the efficacy of a program to enhance college students’ self-regulation learning processes and learning strategies. Psicothema 19, 422–427.

Rozendaal, J. S., Minnaert, A., & Boekaerts, M. (2003). Motivation and self-regulated learning in secondary vocational education: Information-processing type and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 273–289. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(03)00016-5

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future -directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Scherrer, V., & Preckel, F. (2019). Development of motivational variables and self-esteem during the school career: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 211–258

Simons, J., Dewitte, S & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so You´ll know what to learn! British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 343-360.

Sousa, David A. How the Brain Learns (4th ed.). California: Corwin Press, 2011.

Tokuhama-Espinosa. (2008). The scientifically substantiated art of teaching: a study in the development of standards in the new academic field of neuroeducation (mind brain and education science). A PhD dissertation, Capella University, June 2008.A2 [58]

Tokuhama-Espinosa. (2013). Making Classroom Better. 50 practical applications of mind brain and education. W. W. Norton & Company.

Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students: Use of selfhandicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35 (1), pp. 101-122.

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M. (2004). Less is sometimes more: goal content matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (4), pp. 755-764

Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279. 1998.tb01281.x

Weinstein, C. E. (1988). Assessment and training of student learning strategies. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 291-316). New York: Plenum Press.

Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). Learning and study strategies inventory user manual. Clearwater, FL: H&H Publishing Company, Inc.

Weinstein, C.E., & Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., Koedinger, K. R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Munakata, Y., Doebel, S., Schwartz, D. L., Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L., Callaghan, K., Theobald, E. J., Freeman, S., Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2021). Active learning: “Hands-on” meets “minds-on”. Science, 374(6563), 26 30.10.1126/science. abj9957

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). “Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, eds M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 13–41. doi: 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and prospects. Am. Educ. Res. J. 45, 166–183. doi: 10.3102/000283120731 2909

Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). “Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, eds B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Milton Park: Routledge), 49–64.

Zimmerman, B. J., and Moylan, A. R. (2009). “Self-Regulation: where metacognition and motivation intersect,” in Handbook of Metacognition in Education, ed. D. J. Dalam Hacker (New York, NY: Routledge), 299–316

Downloads

Published

2023-12-17

How to Cite

Coutinho, I. R. . (2023). The Impact of Active Methodologies and External Examination on Students’ Motivation. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(12), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.15893