Teaching and Learning Chemistry and Physics with a Laboratory Stations Model in a Flipped Classroom – A Preliminary Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.99.12952Keywords:
flipped classroom, laboratory station, motivation, self-regulationAbstract
This research presents the efforts, to help students, hindered during the COVID19 pandemic, to learn chemistry. With the pandemic, Portuguese students that enrolled in the 10th grade in September 2021, had lower experience in the experimental work, since practical classes at school were suspended from mars 2019 to September 2021. So, students had difficulties in measuring or working with simple laboratory apparatus. They had difficulties in giving meaning to the experimental procedure, describing an observation, collecting data, analyzing data, and interpreting the results. In this context, it was necessary to have a learning and teaching approach different from the one they had in the last three years, to develop the skills they need. The first proposal was to use “Practical work by laboratory stations but it was not enough in the present context. So, a new learning and teaching project that blended digital tools/platforms and practical work in the laboratory was conceived. This learning and teaching project uses hybrid learning environments, based on practical work by laboratory stations, developed according to the collaborative Peer Instruction approach in a flipped classroom environment. The project's main goals were to develop scientific skills (like planning, collecting data observing and measuring, classifying, quantifying, predicting, controlling variables, interpreting, forming conclusions, and communicating) and increase their motivation to learn Chemistry and Physics. But also study the impact of the flipped classroom with laboratory stations, on motivation, self-regulation of learning, the perception of self-efficacy to self-regulate learning and the perceived instrumentality of the self-regulation process. The study population is the students enrolled in the 10th grade (upper secondary school), in a school near Lisbon. The research project was implemented in two classes: one class were subject to the new approach (one in the 10 grade), and the other maintained the regular practice (the control group). In this paper, the results from the first year will be presented and discussed. The data were collected in two moments, in September 2021 and June 2020. The preliminary results, of this research, show that laboratory classes with the flipped room increase not only the motivation and involvement in the learning process but also, the learning outcomes as students become more involved in the tasks.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
Castro, M. (2007). Processos de auto-regulação da aprendizagem: impacto de variáveis académicas e sociais. Tese de doutoramento, em Psicologia Escolar e da Educação, Universidade do Minho, Braga Universidade do Minho.
Cordeiro, P. (2010). Construção e validação do questionário de motivação escolar para a população portuguesa: estudos exploratórios”. Tese de Mestrado, Universidade de Coimbra.
Costa, P. (2005). Estratégias de auto-regulação na aprendizagem em História: Estudo no 2.º CEB, Supervisão no ensino da História. Tese de mestrado. Braga: Universidade do Minho.
Cunha, A. M. E. M. (2002). Aprendizagem auto-(des)regulada? Rotas e percursos em alunos dos 2.º e 3.º Ciclos do Ensino Básico. Tese de mestrado. Braga: Universidade do Minho.
Faulconer, E.K., Griffith, J., & Gruss, A.B. (2021). The impact of positive feedback on student outcomes and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47, 259 - 268.
Guimarães, S. C. M. (2006). Promover a auto-regulação: Uma ferramenta para trabalhar no 2.º Ciclo. Tese de mestrado. Braga: Universidade do Minho.
Henderson, R. W. (1986). Self-regulated learning: Implications for the design of instructional modules. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 405-427.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychology, 34, 113-125.
Husman, J., Derryberry, W. P., Crowson, H. M., & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task value and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 63-
Coutinho, I. R. (2022). Teaching and Learning Chemistry and Physics with a Laboratory Stations Model in a Flipped Classroom – A Preliminary Report.
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008) Feedback on assessment: students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33:3, 263-275
Lourenço, A. (2007) Processos Auto-Regulatórios em Alunos do 3º. Ciclo do Ensino Básico: Contributos da Auto-Eficácia e da Instrumentalidade, Tese de doutoramento, Universidade do Minho, 2008.
Malecka, B. & Boud, D. (2021). Fostering student motivation and engagement with feedback through ipsative processes Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Published online: 17 May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1928061
Malecka, B. Ajjawi, R., Boud, D. & Tai, J. (2021). An empirical study of student action from ipsative design of feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Published online: 26 Aug 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968338
Mota, A. R. (2012). Ensaio Prático do Movimento Core Knowledge no Ensino da Física em Portugal. Tese de Doutoramento, Universidade do Porto.
Mota, R., Lopes dos Santos, J., Esperto, P & Ribau, I. (2019). Peer and Self-assessment: a mathematical model to improve the students' accountability in laboratory stations model. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 1, 7-11. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/16031.
Mota, R., Lopes, J., Lopes dos Santos. J. (2012). Estações laboratoriais: uma aposta no ensino experimental. Gazeta de Física, 6, 25-27.
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.). Perception (pp. 239-266). London: Ablex Publishing.
Pestana, M. H., & Gageiro, J. N. (2008). Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS (5ª Ed). Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., and O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 35, No. 3, May 2010, 277–289
Ribau, I. (2020). Practical Work by Laboratory Stations, an Innovation in Experimental Work. Universal Journal of Educational Research. Vol 8 (1), 17-26. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080103.
Rosário, P. (1999). Variáveis cognitivo–motivacionais na aprendizagem: As abordagens ao estudo em alunos do Ensino Secundário. Tese de doutoramento. Braga: Universidade do Minho
Rosário, P. (2001). Diferenças processuais na aprendizagem: Avaliação alternativa das estratégias de autoregulação da aprendizagem. Psicologia, Educação e Cultura, 1 (1), 87-102.
Rosário, P. (2004). Estudar o estudar: As (Des)venturas do Testas. Porto: Porto Editora.
Rosário, P., Ferreira, I. & Cunha, A. (2003). Inventário de Processos de Estudo (I.P.E.). In M. M. Gonçalves, M. R.
Simões, L. S. Almeida & C. Machado (Eds.), Avaliação Psicológica. Instrumentos validados para a população portuguesa (Vol. 1). Coimbra: Quarteto Rosário, P., Ferreira, I. & Cunha, A. (2003). Inventário de Processos de Estudo (I.P.E.). In M. M. Gonçalves, M. R.
Simões, L. S. Almeida & C. Machado (Eds.), Avaliação Psicológica. Instrumentos validados para a população portuguesa (Vol. 1). Coimbra: Quarteto. Rosário, P., Núñez, J., & González-Pienda, J. (2006). Comprometer-se com o estudar na universidade: cartas do Gervásio ao seu umbigo. Porto: Almedina
Rosário, P., Núñez, J., González-Pienda, J., Valle, A., Trigo, L., & Guimarães, C. (2010). Enhancing self-regulation and approaches to learning in first-year college students: a narrative-based program in the Iberian Peninsula. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25. Doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0020-y
Rosário, P., Soares, S., Mourão, R., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J. A., Simões, F., & Pina, F. H. (2005). Disrupção percebida e auto-regulação da aprendizagem no Ensino Básico. Psicologia e Educação, 4(1), 77-90.
Rosário, P., Soares, S., Núñez, J. C., González-Pienda, J., & Rúbio, M. (2004). Processos de auto-regulação da aprendizagem e realização escolar no Ensino Básico. Psicologia, Educação e Cultura, 8(1), 141-157. 103
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Social Origins of Self-Regulatory Competence. Educational Psychologist, 32 (4), 195-208.
Webb, A., & Willis, L. (2019). Enhancing Feedback for Engineering Students. Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, Loughborough University.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated Learner: Witch Are the key Subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 307-313.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of self-regulation. (pp. 13-39). New York: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 397-417.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Isabel Ribau Coutinho

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
