The Ecological Wars: The Notion, Concept And Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.76.8445Keywords:
Biosphere, ecological war, feedbacks, forecasting, globalization, pandemic, SBT-structures, sociology, time regimeAbstract
Drawing on a scientific literature on the Biosphere and the global SBT-structure and development, on Russian, foreign and my own investigations of global ecological issues and environmental movements, I came to the following conclusions. First, these issues are both important practically and theoretically. Second, under the ecological war I mean all kinds of harm which is caused by man to the natural, human and complex invasion into the natural and social ecosystems. Third, the researchers are still follow the principle ‘Firstly, we should to cope with the after-effects of a certain disaster and then to evaluate their immediate and far-reaching outcomes’. Four, our urgent task is to foresee the coming disaster and to have a time to take the preventive measures in advance. Five, I distinguish three main archetypes of the ecological wars that I conditionally names as the natural, social and the feedback’s wars conducted by the global SBT-system against natural, social and mixed ecosystems. Six, the time regime of the global SBT-system functioning and of the ecological wars is very important but still ill-investigated issues. Seven, the main resource of any ecological war is the speed of its spreading in time and space and transformation of natural ecosystems. Eight, the current pandemic showed that the systemic approach, interdisciplinary and prognostic researches are the main instruments for coping with the ecological wars. It follows that the sociologists have to learn and widely-use these three theoretical instruments.
References
Beck U. 1992. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. London: SAGE. 260 pp.
Beck U. 1999. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press. 184 pp.
Burawoy M. 2008. What is to be Done? Theses on the Degradation of Social Existence in a Globalizing World. Current Sociology 56 (3): 351-59.
Meadows D.L. and Meadows D. H., eds. 1973. Toward Global Equilibrium. Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen Press.
Kravchenko S. 2020. Being Cosmopolitan and Anti-Cosmopolitan—The Complex Risks of the Covid-19: The Demand to Move from the Society of Normalization to ‘Global Medical Surveillance.’ European Sociologist, Issue 45 Vol. 1. URL:
Yanitsky, O. N. (2020). The Ecological Wars: The Notion, Concept And Dynamics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(6) 477-488. https:// www.europeansociologist.org/issue-45-pandemic-impossibilities-vol-1/theorising-being-cosmopolitan-andanti-cosmopolitan-complex-risks (last access: 11 June, 2020).
Meadows D.H., Meadows D. l., Randers J.W. 1989. The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Universe Books.
Pfister S. Theorizing – The Social Definition of the Corona Pandemic//Pandemic (im)possibilities. 2020. European Sociologist: issue 45: VOL. 1. URL: https://www.europeansociologist.org/issue-45-pandemic-impossibilities-vol-1/theorising-%E2%80%93-social-definition-corona-pandemic (last access: 11 June, 2020).
Yanitsky O. 2015. Are the Sociologists Well Prepared to the Modern War? Journal of Social Sciences Research. 2015, Vol. 6 (3): 1090-1098. Available at: http://cirworld.com/journals/index.php/jssr/article/view/3680/pdf_99
Yanitsky O. 2016. Sociobiotechnical systems: a New Approach to Man-Nature Interactions, in: Yanitsky O. On Globalization and its Environmental Consequences. Moscow: IS RAS’ pp. 123-135. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/index.php?_id1198&id=4603
Yanitsky O. 2019. Perechodnyi Period: Tseli Izucheniya, Teoriya, Prtaktika [A Transition Period: The Research Aims, Theory, Practice]. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia Editorial House. 287 pp. (In Russ.).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Oleg Yanitsky

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
