From Interdisiplinary Interactions Toward Interdisciplinary Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.75.8214Keywords:
critical situation, globalization, global SBT-system, interdisciplinary approach, knowledge, metabolic processes, pandemics, timeAbstract
The article presents a set of arguments on favor of an interdisciplinary approach to any events and transformations of the global SBT-system. Drawing on my previous social experience, the analysis of relevant scientific literature and my own studies on the emergence and development of current pandemics I came to the following conclusions. First, every social or natural action has an interdisciplinary character. Second, the regularities of global SBT-structure development and its feedbacks in relation to global economic and social life are still ill studied. Third, the key moment of any natural and social transformation and the interdisciplinary collaboration are the metabolic processes between qualitatively different essences. Four, the above changes points to the fact that the XX century and further has transformed a scientific thought and knowledge into the planetary phenomena. Five, it’s reflects that under current conditions all are interrelated with all. Six, the interdisciplinary approach to an SBT-system of any scale and mode of development has become absolutely necessary. Seven, the emergence and quick spread the pandemics across the world I call as the global critical situation, and it means that the global SBT-system has become over-integrated.
References
Bauman Z. 2017. A Chronicle of Crisis: 2011-2016. London, UK: Social Europe Edition. 163p. 367
Yanitsky, O. N. (2020) A Comparative From Interdisiplinary Interactions Toward Interdisciplinary Knowledge. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, Beck U. 1999. World Risk Society. Malden, MA: Polity Press. 184 pp.
Burawoy M. 2008. What is to be Done? Theses on the Degradation of Social Existence in a Globalizing World. Current Sociology, 56 (3): 351-359.
Burawoy M. 2015. Facing the unequal world. Current Sociology, 63 (1): 5-34.
Chizhevsky A. 1924. Fizicheskie factory istoricheskogo processa [Physical Factors of a Historical Process]. Kaluga: Pervaya Tipolitigraphiya. 121 pp. (In Russ.).
Chizhevsky A. 1976. Zemnoe eho solnechnykh bur’ [The Earth Echo of Sun Storms]. Moskva: Mysl’ (In Russ.).
Haberl H., Fisher-Kowalski M., Krausmann F. and Winiwater V., eds. 2016. Society-Nature Relations across Time and Space. ISBN (on-line): 978-3-319-33326-7. Available at: http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-33326-7
Meadows D.L. and Meadows D. H., eds. 1973. Toward Global Equilibrium. Cambridge, Mass.: Wright-Allen Press.
Meadows D.H., Meadows D. l., Randers J.W. 1989. The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. 2nd ed. N.Y.: Universe Books.
Sommervill M. and Rapport D., eds. 2000. Recreating Integrated Knowledge. Oxford, UK: EOLSS Publ. 271 pp.
Vernadsky Vl. 1977. The Thoughts of the Naturalist. A Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon. Moscow: Nauka Publ. House. Vol 2, 191 pp. (In Russ.).
Von Weizsäcker E.U. and Wijkman A. 2018. Come On! Capitalism, Short-termism, Population, and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1
Yanitsky N. 2007. The Economic Crisis in the Great Novgorod in the XVI Century. Kiev: St. Vladimir University. Reprint Edition. [Compiled and edited by O.N. Yanitsky]. Moscow: TAUS. 169 pp.
Yanitsky O. 2014. Sociology of Critical Areas. Open Journal of Social Science Research. Vol.2 (3): 112-118. Available at: http://manuscript.sciknow.org/uploads/ojssr/pub/ojssr_140963345.pdf
Yanitsky O. 2016. Sociobiotechnical systems: a New Approach to Man-Nature Interactions, in: Yanitsky O. On Globalization and its Environmental Consequences. Moscow: IS RAS’ pp. 123-135. Available at: http://www.isras.ru/index.php?_id1198&id=4603
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Oleg Yanitsky

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
