Understanding What Drives the Adoption of Data Analytics Among Academic Leaders and Supervisors in a Jewish Higher Education Institution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.1210.17624Keywords:
Big Data Analytics, Big Data, Higher Education, Jewish, Jewish EducationAbstract
This study explores the determinants influencing the adoption of Big Data Analytics (BDA) within the Jewish higher education system centered in the Northwestern United States of America, emphasizing the impact of six key factors: Absorptive Capacity, Technological Resource Competency, Competition Intensity, Complexity, Compatibility, and Relative Advantage, alongside participants' age. Utilizing a quantitative methodology, the research surveyed 64 managerial role employees across the academic institution. Results from multiple regression analysis indicate a statistically significant relationship between these factors and the behavioral intention toward BDA adoption, with Compatibility emerging as the predominant predictor. This finding underscores the critical role of perceived consistency with existing needs and practices in influencing BDA adoption intentions. Moreover, Marketing Department Leadership exhibited significantly lower ratings in both Absorptive Capacity and behavioral intention toward BDA adoption based on a MANOVA analysis compared to other types of academic institutional leaders, suggesting a discrepancy in recognizing and leveraging new external information for competitive advantage within this group. The study concludes with recommendations for higher education institutions aiming to transition towards data-driven decision-making, highlighting the importance of fostering an organizational culture that values data literacy and aligns BDA initiatives with institutional goals. Limitations and directions for future research are also discussed, advocating for a broader investigation into behavioral intentions and the potential benefits of applying the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior in understanding BDA adoption.
References
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179‐211.
Agrawal, K. P. (2015). Investigating the determinants of Big Data Analytics (BDA) adoption in Asian emerging economies. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1.
Behl, A., Dutta, P., Lessmann, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., &Kar, S. (2019). A conceptual framework for the adoption of big data analytics by e-commerce startups: a case-based approach. Information Systems and eBusiness Management, 17(2-4), 285-318.
Cabrera-Sánchez, J. P., & Villarejo-Ramos, A. F. (2020). Factors affecting the adoption of big data analytics in companies. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59, 415-429.
Chaurasia, S. S., & Rosin, A. F. (2017). From Big Data to Big Impact: analytics for teaching and learning in higher education. [Analytics for teaching and learning] Industrial and Commercial Training, 49(7), 321-328.
Correa, D. (2021, September 2). Big data and business analytics market predicted to grow at CAGR of 10.9% by 2027 with revenue $420.98 billion. EIN News. Retrieved from https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/550361117/big-data-and-business-analytics-market-predicted-togrow-at-cagr-of-10-9-by-2027-with-revenue-420-98-billion
Ermakova, T., Blume, J., Fabian, B., Fomenko, E., Berlin, M., & Hauswirth, M. (2021, January). Beyond the hype: why do data-driven projects fail? In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Kwon, O., Lee, N., & Shin, B. (2014). Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International journal of information management, 34(3), 387-394.
Monnappa, A. (2022, December 16). Data Science vs. Big Data vs. Data Analytics. Simplilearn. Retrieved from https://www.simplilearn.com/data-science-vs-big-data-vs-data-analytics-article
Murumba, J., & Micheni, E. (2017). Big data analytics in higher education: A review. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(06), 14-21.
Nguyen, A., Gardner, L., & Sheridan, D. (2020). Data analytics in higher education: An integrated view. Journal of Information Systems Education, 31(1), 61-71.
Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990) The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 79-91.
Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 24–43.
Shet, S. V., Poddar, T., Samuel, F. W., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Examining the determinants of successful adoption of data analytics in human resource management–A framework for implications. Journal of Business Research, 131, 311-326.
Taylor, S. & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137‐156.
Watson, H. J. (2014). Tutorial: Big data analytics: Concepts, technologies, and applications. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34(1)
Wu, C., Buyya, R., & Ramamohanarao, K. (2016). Big Data Analytics= Machine Learning+ Cloud Computing. ArXiv, abs/1601.03115.
Zaman, U., Zahid, H., Shah, M. & Haji, B. (2021). Adoption of Big Data Analytics (BDA) Technologies in Disaster Management: A Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior (DTPB) Approach. Cogent Business & Management. 8. 1-20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tzvi C. Eleff, Aldwin Domingo, Nicholas Bowersox, Donna Day

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.