Generative AI Policy
Archives of Business Research · Policies
Generative AI Policy
Responsible use of generative AI tools by authors, reviewers, and editors.
Archives of Business Research recognises that authors and reviewers may use generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as large language models. This policy sets out their responsible use and is consistent with COPE’s position and the practice of leading publishers.
AI cannot be an author
Generative AI tools do not qualify for authorship. They cannot take responsibility for a work’s accuracy, integrity, or originality, and cannot agree to be accountable. AI tools must therefore never be listed as authors or co-authors.
Disclosure by authors
Authors must disclose any use of generative AI in the preparation of a manuscript. Include a statement (for example, under “Use of Generative AI”) that names the tool and version and describes how it was used — for instance, for language editing, summarising literature, or generating code or figures. Routine tools such as basic spelling and grammar checkers do not require disclosure.
Author responsibility
Authors are fully responsible for the entire content of their manuscript, including any portion produced with AI assistance. They must verify all facts, citations, data, and quotations, since AI tools can produce plausible but incorrect or fabricated output. Using AI to fabricate or falsify data, results, or references, or to manipulate images, is research misconduct.
Reviewers and editors
Reviewers must not upload manuscripts or any part of them to generative AI tools, as this breaches the confidentiality of the unpublished work, and must not rely on AI to produce their assessment. Editors must keep submission content confidential and must not use AI tools in ways that compromise confidentiality or the integrity of the decision.
Updates
This is an evolving area; the journal will review and update this policy in line with emerging best practice.
