Yield Estimation and Factors Influencing Acceptance of Sweet potato Vines of Virus Free Varieties in Selected Agro-ecological Zones in Tanzania

Authors

  • Castory Kibiki Beyond Cotton Project, World Food Program, Mwanza, Tanzania
  • Paul Saidia Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Mwanza, Tanzania
  • Mohammed Shemahonge Tanzania Agricultural Research Institute, Ukiriguru, Mwanza, Tanzania
  • Fabian Mihafu Mbeya University of Science and Technology, Mbeya, Tanzania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.124.17243

Keywords:

Farmers, Food security, Income, Planting materials, Viral disease

Abstract

The effort of initiating the production and vine multiplication of sweetpotato using certified virus free vines focuses on promoting high yields towards enhancing food security and income generation among smallholder farmers. This study examines yield of sweetpotato tubers and vine multiplication per hectare using certified virus free vines in the Lake Victoria and Coastal Zones in Tanzania. Primary data were collected using questionnaire tool from 362 farmers who are sweetpotato tubers producers and 133 farmers who are producers of virus free vines. The sample was chosen from each selected agro-ecological zone by simple random sampling technique. The yield estimation was calculated using Microsoft Excel 2007 and the factors influencing uptake of variety was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS ver. 20, IBM, USA). The study findings showed that, mean production of virus free sweetpotato tubers was relatively higher in the Lake Zone (1309.44kg) compare to Coastal Zone (1249.75kg). On the other hand, mean of vine multiplication was relatively higher in Coastal Zone (276.65kg) compared to Lake Zones (133.34kg). These results highlight that, the level of sweet potato yield depends on the amount of land used in production, as the farmers expand the cultivated area the amount of yield increases significantly. Gender, occupation, training and distance were some of the factors that influenced the acceptance of sweetpotato tubers and vine multiplication significantly at 10%. Therefore investing in the production of sweetpotato tubers and vine multiplication using quality variety which is free from virus is highly worth undertaking as the variety generates high quantity of yields per hectare.

References

Daurov D, Wondimu T, Wondimu T, Feyissa T, Bedadav G. Production of virus-free sweet potato planting material, department of breeding and biotechnology. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2018; 20(4): 851−856.

Degu G, Uragie E, Zeberga A, Musemil S, Adane T. Sweet potato market chain analysis, Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 5(7): 240 – 264.

Ferrari L, Fromma I, Jenny K, Muhirec A, Scheideggera U. (2017). Formal and informal seed potato supply systems analysis. Germany. [https://landlivespeace. files.wordpress.com/2015/03/saturday-july-11_workshop_ian-robertson.pdf].

Low J. sweet potato development and delivery in sub-saharan Africa, African Journal of food, agriculture, nutritional and development.2017; 17(2): 11955-11972.

Mukhopadhyay SK, Chattopadhyay A, Chakraborty I, Bhattacharya I. Crops that feed the world. Sweetpotato. Sweetpotatoes for income and food security. Food Sci. 2011; 3:283-305

Mwiti KF. (2015), assessment of willingness to pay for quality sweet potato planting materials, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Ngailo S, Shimelis HA, Sibiya J, Mtunda K. Sweet potato farming systems, production constraints and breeding priorities, Sugarcane Research Institute, Kibaha, Tanzania, Journal of Plant and Soil.2015; 1–8pp.

Ogero K, Bukania C, McEwan M. (2015), Sweetpotato Seed Systems and Crop Management Community of Practice, Regional Technical Support Platform for East, West, Central and Southern Africa Third Consultation: The Business Case for Sweetpotato Seed Multiplication, Kigali Rwanda.

Prakash P, Kishore P, Jaganathan D, Immanual S. (2018), Status, performance and impact of sweet potato cultivation on farming communities of Odisha, India. [ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277216/files/Prakash_ICAE% 202018R. pdf].

Tairo F, Kullaya A, Valkonen JPT. Incidence of viruses infecting sweetpotato in Tanzania. Plant Disease. 2004; 88(9): 916 – 920.

Jones D, Bergh C, Kpaka PO, Gugerty MK, Anderson CL. (2012). Sweetpotato value chain: Tanzania. [https://evans.uw.edu/sites/default/files/ EPAR_UW_ Requ est_211_Tanzania_Sweet%20Potatoes_Final.pdf]

Degu G, Uragie E, Zeberga A, Musemil S, Adane T Sweet potato market chain analysis, Ethiopia. Greener Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2015; 5(7): 240 – 264.

Kankam F, Abayateye V, Akpatsu BI. Preliminary Study on Evaluation of Sweet Potato Genotypes for Resistance to Sweet Potato Virus Disease (SPVD). Ghana Journal of Science, Technology and Development. 2022; 8(2): 33-43. https://doi.org/10.47881/324.967x th

Kothari CR, (2019). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 4 Edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-13

How to Cite

Kibiki, C., Saidia, P., Shemahonge, M., & Mihafu, F. (2024). Yield Estimation and Factors Influencing Acceptance of Sweet potato Vines of Virus Free Varieties in Selected Agro-ecological Zones in Tanzania. Discoveries in Agriculture and Food Sciences, 12(4), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.14738/tnc.124.17243