The Cultural Forces and Women Livelihood Options in Rural Areas of Kano State, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.32.1852Keywords:
Environmental SciencesAbstract
The paper explores the cultural issues surrounding buying and selling engaged by rural women to supplement their housewifery functions. The aim of the study is to evaluate the various livelihood options that are culturally permissible in the study area with a view to understand the variation of occupations in relation to the cultural norms of the people involved. Occupational clusters were identified; the reasons for adoption of occupations, risks and inconveniences as well as people responses were envisaged. It is cross sectional research that involves both quantitative and qualitative type of data. Demographic characteristics of women especially age and preferences were captured. Questionnaires and interviews were employed for the quantitative and qualitative data collection respectively. The study discovered that indoor occupations such as food and eatery items within matrimonial homes are the modal livelihood options due to cultural values. Problem of poverty affects women due to social inequality and the people who patronize such occupations in the rural environment are affected by poverty. Some respondents described the women’s occupation as a ‘last option’ because the profit obtainable is too meager commensurate to the laboring nature of the occupations. Many people described the act as marginal due to hardship, burden and risk involve. Many women sustain injury; at times enter social trauma in the livelihood options. The women complain of poor economic backing and support from husbands, relatives and family members. High cost of materials in some of women’s occupations affect the choice of the occupation to pursue. The study pathetically discovered that the women are marginalized due to lack of capital. The loitering under the sun and rain is affecting their health (mental and moral) hence at high risk of ailment. The study recommends for provision of financial and moral supports by both government and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) to reduce the burden on women who are for various cultural reasons made poor so that they are allow to earn living with minimum duress
References
Ahmed, (2008): spatial poverty trap and the impact through improved accessibility.
Ahmed F. (2001) gender division of labor, step towards development
Ahmed N. WAHAB M.A and Thiested, SH (2007) the integrated aquaculturePagriculture system in Asia, potential for sustained livelihood and nutritional security of the rural poor
Ahmed N. (2009) the sustainable livelihood approach to the development of fish farming In rural Bangladesh
AkoPNai R. I, Olagunde O.A., and Adekola O.G (2010): “Global integration, Household survival and economic empowerment of women in Osun state Nigeria. Via http//www.edu/Nigeria studies/article/issue/1P2article
AlPAmin S(2008) roles of women in maintaining sustainable livelihood of characters in selected area of Jabalpur district.
Ayodapo O.G (2010)” economic activities and coping strategies among female AgroPpastoralist in Ogun state Nigeria retrieved via http/www.ozelacdemy.com/ojssv3n2P1pdf
Dalladi, F.S (2016): Mapping of women strategies and livelihood in Tsanyawa LGA, a BSc project submitted to Department of Geography, Bayero University Kano
Lambu,'I.'B.'(2016).'The'Cultural'Forces'and'Women'Livelihood'Options'in'Rural'Areas'of'Kano'State,'Nigeria.)Advances)in)Social)Sciences)Research)
Ezra D.B (2009). Decision making for heterogeneity diversity in resources, farmers objectives and livelihood strategies and livelihood strategies in northern Nigeria (thesis) http:/www.nrc.no/arc/mg/929358/pdf
Fakir S.K (2008): women empowerment through participation of sable by Unna University.
Francis O. (2009). Conceptualizing livelihood diversity in developing countries: Evidence and policy implication. http://www.cifor.org/publication /pdfPfiles/book/household
Frank E. (1999). Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: Evidence and policy implication. http://www.cifor.org/publication /pdfPfiles/book/household
Kandiyoti, D. (1988), women and rural development policies: the changing Agenda, institute development studies, Brighton, UK.
Lambu, I.B. (2013): A geographical analysis of religious landscapes in Kano metropolis, A PhD Thesis submitted to Department of Geography, Bayero University Kano
Lambu, I.B. (2015): Sensing birth preferences among spouses in Kano metropolis, Advance in social sciences research journal vol.2 No 12
M.S. F. Azim (2004) challenge of women livelihood strategies in a dry zone Peasant colonization scheme in rural sriPlank via http:/www.irsa world.org/prior/x1/paper/4P2pdf
Matin I. Suleiman. M and Rabbani, M. (2008), crafting a graduation pathway for ultraPpoor Olofin E.A(1987) some aspect of physical geography of the Kano region and related human respond. (BUK).
NPC (2006) national population commission, 2006 census.
Parven. S. (2005), Empowerment of rural women in Bangladesh: Household level Analysis Germany Margrat publisher GMBH.
Prothero Migrant Labour from northwest Nigeria Africa Quisumbung, AR and Mcclafferty, B, (2006), using gender research in developing food security practice. International food policy research Institute (IFPRI). Washington DC.
Sheikh MNI, (2003), micro finance and social change. A case study household finance, Bradford, England
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
