Thinking about research paradigms in educational research

Authors

  • Shiyun Wang
  • Pengju Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.31.1708

Abstract

In this essay, I will consider the question “what is research” and discuss the three important research paradigms. The three important research paradigms are positivistic, interpretive and critical paradigms. First of all, I try to explain the definition of research deeply. Many scholars give us many different definitions of research, these definitions explain the research from different aspects, and they have respective characteristics. At the same time, I will try to make clear what educational research is. Secondly, I focus on the nature and significance of research paradigms and reasons why these are important in thinking about research. Thirdly, I will comment on the characteristics of “good” and “bad” research in terms of my own experience. Finally, I will analyze qualitative approaches and quantitative approaches; my purpose is to explain why so much research in education employs qualitative approaches.

References

BournotOTrites, M & Belanger, J. (2005). Ethical Dilemmas Facing Action Researchers. The journal of educational thought; Calgary. Rerieved Jan 21, 2006, from Academic research library database.

Burns, R. (2000). Introduction to research methods. (First edition). Melbourne: Longman. ISBN: 0582911877..

Campbell, J & Husbands, C (2000). On the Reliability of OFSTED Inspection of Initial Teacher Training: a case study. British Educational Research Journal; Oxford. Rerieved Jan 21, 2006, from Academic research library database.

Carroll, JM & Swatman, PA. (2000). StructuredOcase: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems; Basingstoke. Rerieved Jan 21, 2006, from Academic research library database.

Clark, C. (2005). The structure of educational research. British Educational Research Journal; Oxford. Rerieved Jan 21, 2006, from Academic research library database.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison K. (2000). Research methods in education. (5th edition). London: Routledge/faomer. ISBN: 0415195411.

Cowie, B. (2006). Handout on Research Method of Education. University of Waikato, School of Education, Hamiltom, New Zealand.

Kennedy, M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Research, 26 (7), 4O12. ISSN: 0013189X. URL:)http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.31.1708.) 132 Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol.3, Issue 1 JanuaryO2016

Maykut, P. & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: a philosophic and practical guide. London ; Washington, D.C. : Falmer Press. ISBN: 0750702729.

Peca, K. (2000). Positivism in Education: Philosophical, Research, and Organizational assumptions. U.S. New Mexico. Retrieved Jan 20, 2006, from ERIC database.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-18

How to Cite

Wang, S., & Zhu, P. (2016). Thinking about research paradigms in educational research. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.31.1708