Testing Baron and Kenny’s Preliminary Conditions for Mediating or Moderating Variables in Structural Equation Modeling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.28.1352Abstract
A common misnomer in statistical analysis is the identification of intervening variables as either moderating or mediating as a result of placement of another latent construct or variables between exogenous and endogenous variables in a Structural Equation Model (SEM). However, placement does not determine variable status. Determination of variable status requires the application of Baron and Kenny’s preliminary conditions and analysis for determining whether a variable is moderating, mediating, or in fact, intervening. This procedure aids in statistically representing the actual strength and direction of variables in order to improve reporting predictor results on outcomes. An SEM was developed using the results of the analysis of the Biomedical Engineering Interdepartmental (BEI) Survey conducted in 2011. This document illustrates the application of Baron and Kenny’s method to the BEI survey SEM model.References
Arbuckle, J.L. (2009), AMOS User’s Guide (Version 18.0.0)[Software]. Available at http://amosdevelopment.com.
Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., and Gil, K. M. (2006), “Conceptualizing and Testing Random Indirect Effects and Moderated Mediation in Multilevel Models: New Procedures and Recommendations,” Psychological Methods, 11, 142I163.
DeVellis, R.F. (2003), Scale development: Theory and applications, (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., and Chrisitan, L.M. (2009), Internet, Mail and MixedIMode Surveys. The Tailored Design Method, (Third Edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Donabedian, A. (1989), “Institutional and Professional Responsibilities in Quality Assurance,” Quality Assurance in Health Care, 1, 3I11.
Donabedian A. (1988), “The Quality of Care. How Can it Be Assessed?” Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 1743I1748.
Donabedian A. (1980), Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Volume 1. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.
Donabedian, A. (1966), “Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care,” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44, 166I206.
Fiedler, B.A. (2011), Effects of Hospital Structural Complexity and Process Adequacy on the Prevalence of Systemic Adverse Events and Compliance Issues: A Biomedical Engineering Technician Perspective”. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida.
Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G., and Sakakibara, S. (1994), “A Framework for Quality Management Research and an Associated Measurement Instrument,” Journal of Operations Management, 11, 339I366.
Hayes, A. F. (2009), “Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium,” Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., and Fritz, M. S. (2007), “Mediation Analysis,” Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593I614.
Sobel, M.E. (1982), “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” in S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, pp. 290I312. San Francisco: JosseyIBass.
Sobel, M.E. (1986), “Some New Results on Indirect Effects and Their Standard Errors in Covariance Structure Models,” in N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, pp. 159I186. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
SPSS, Inc. (2009, July 30). PASW Statistics (Version 18.0.0) [Computer Software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
Woodworth, R.S. (1928). Dynamic psychology. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
