A Community Informatics Framework for Enhancing Digital Capability Among Mature Women: A Conceptual Model for the Trefoil Guild Melaka

Authors

  • Muhammad Suhaizan Sulong Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Azlianor Abdul-Aziz Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Nor Mas Aina Md Bohari Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Rosmiza Wahida Abdullah Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Amir Syarifuddin Kasim Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Sabrina Ahmad Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Nurazlina Md. Sanusi Girl Guides Association of Malaysia, Melaka Branch

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1212.19699

Keywords:

Community Informatics, Mature Women, Digital Capability, Sociotechnical Systems, Data Governance, Trefoil Guild

Abstract

Digital capability has become essential for participation in social, civic, and organisational life, yet mature women continue to experience persistent obstacles that inhibit effective digital engagement. Although Malaysia’s digital transformation initiatives—such as the Malaysia Digital Economy Blueprint (MyDIGITAL)—have expanded infrastructural access, national-level improvements do not automatically translate into sustained capability among older women. Their digital trajectories are shaped more significantly by learning environments, community expectations, organisational routines, and trust in data use practices than by technology availability alone. Within voluntary organisations such as the Trefoil Guild Melaka, members express interest in using digital tools but face barriers related to unfamiliar interfaces, inconsistent workflows, device limitations, and uncertainty surrounding the sharing, storage, and governance of community-generated data. Drawing on Digital Capability Theory, Community Informatics (CI), Sociotechnical Systems (STS), and emerging literature on Community Data Governance, this paper proposes a Community Informatics–Based Digital Capability Framework tailored to mature women’s learning and participation contexts. This expanded conceptual model explains how social learning environments, sociotechnical alignment, and transparent data practices jointly shape confidence, skill development, digital agency, and sustained organisational participation. The model consolidates theoretical insights, clarifies mechanisms linking community practices to capability outcomes, and offers a foundation for empirical evaluation. Implications for programme design, leadership decisions, and community data stewardship are discussed to support mature women’s empowerment in digitally mediated environments.

References

Kebede, A. S., Ozolins, L.-L., Holst, H., & Galvin, K. (2022). Digital engagement of older adults: A scoping review. JMIR, 24(12).

Yang, H., et al. (2022). Digital inclusion among older adults. Frontiers in Public Health, 10.

Vercruyssen, A. (2023). How “basic” is basic digital literacy for older adults? Rethinking skills and learning contexts. Frontiers in Education, 8.

Pejić Bach, M., & Čelan, M. (2025). Exploring the relationship between digital competency and life satisfaction among older adults. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 11.

Kacar, Y., & De Luca, G. (2023). Digital inclusion for a good digital society: Leveraging the digital divide. The British Academy.

An, J., Wan, K., Xiang, Z., Zhu, X., An, J., & Yang, Y. (2025). Effects of privacy concerns on older adults’ discontinuous usage intention. Frontiers in Public Health, 13.

Lu, S. Y., et al. (2024). Older adults’ perceptions of community-based digital interventions. JMIR Aging, 7.

Miller, L.-M., et al. (2024). Digital literacy training for low-income older adults through community engaged learning. JMIR Aging, 7.

Pizzul, D., et al. (2024). Peer-education digital literacy course for older adults. Frontiers in Sociology, 9.

McIver, W. J. (2004). Communicating in the information society. UNDP WSIS Report.

Gurstein, M. (2007). What is community informatics? Community Development Journal, 42(3), 391–404.

Kronlid, D. O., Bengtsson, S., Eckartz, A., & Elbe, S. (2024). Sociotechnical dimensions of digital systems. Technology in Society, 78.

Demeke, M. M., Worku, M., & Fante-Coleman, T. (2024). Existing models of community governance of health data. Wellesley Institute.

Ada Lovelace Institute. (2024). Participatory and inclusive data stewardship.

Calac, A. J., et al. (2025). Responsible stewardship of research data in community settings. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(3), 245–262.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-13

How to Cite

Sulong, M. S., Abdul-Aziz, A., Bohari, N. M. A. M., Abdullah, R. W., Kasim, A. S., Ahmad, S., & Sanusi, N. M. (2025). A Community Informatics Framework for Enhancing Digital Capability Among Mature Women: A Conceptual Model for the Trefoil Guild Melaka. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(12), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1212.19699

Most read articles by the same author(s)