The Role of Fines in Punishment: Historical Origins, Legal Regulation and Comparative Judicial Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1212.19755Keywords:
Criminal fines, comparative criminal law, monetary penaltiesAbstract
Our study examines the historical development, legal foundations, and comparative judicial application of fines in the United States, Germany and Japan. It highlights significant structural differences between fine systems—particularly between Germany’s income-based day-fine model and the rigid statutory framework in post-socialist and identifies persistent tensions between the deterrent purpose of fines and their disproportionate impact on economically vulnerable offenders. The study concludes that reforms such as income-sensitive fine calculation, non-custodial enforcement mechanisms, and stronger judicial capacity for proportional sentencing are essential to align monetary penalties with core principles of criminal justice.
References
Albrecht, H.-J. (1980). Strafzumessung bei schwerer Kriminalität: Eine vergleichende theoretische und empirische Studie zur Herstellung und Darstellung des Strafmaßes. Duncker & Humblot.
Albrecht, H.-J. (2001). Comparative sentencing research: Lessons from international research, with a special focus on Germany. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 2(1), 116-128.
Ashworth, A. (2015). Sentencing and criminal justice (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Beccaria, C. (1995). On crimes and punishments and other writings (R. Bellamy, Ed.; R. Davies, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1764)
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
Beckett, K., & Harris, A. (2011). On cash and conviction: Monetary sanctions as misguided policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 10(3), 505-537.
Drew, K. F. (1991). The laws of the Salian Franks. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1993). Crime and punishment in American history. Basic Books.
Government Accountability Office. (2018). Criminal fines: Oversight and accountability for federal fines could be improved (GAO-18-203). U.S. Government Accountability Office.
Haley, J. O. (1998). Comment: The implications of apology. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 1133-1138.
Harris, A. (2016). A pound of flesh: Monetary sanctions as punishment for the poor. Russell Sage Foundation.
Hillsman, S. T. (1990). Fines and day fines. Crime and Justice, 12, 49-98.
Johnson, D. T. (2002). The Japanese way of justice: Prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford University Press.
Jolowicz, H. F., & Nicholas, B. (1972). Historical introduction to the study of Roman law (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E. (2019). Day-fines: Reviving the idea and reversing the (costly) punitive trend. American Criminal Law Review, 56(2), 333-372.
Miyazawa, S. (2008). The politics of increasing punitiveness and the rising populism in Japanese criminal justice policy. Punishment & Society, 10(1), 47-77.
Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 199-263.
Starr, S. B., & Rehavi, M. M. (2013). Mandatory sentencing and racial disparity: Assessing the role of prosecutors and the effects of Booker. Yale Law Journal, 123(1), 2-80.
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.
Tonry, M., & Hatlestad, K. (Eds.). (1997). Sentencing reform in overcrowded times: A comparative perspective. Oxford University Press.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2018). Guidelines manual. United States Sentencing Commission.
von Hirsch, A., & Jareborg, N. (1991). Gauging criminal harm: A living-standard analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 1-38.
Weigend, T. (2001). Sentencing and punishment in Germany. In M. Tonry & R. S. Frase (Eds.), Sentencing and sanctions in Western countries (pp. 188-221). Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Baasanjav Jadamba, Tuya Gal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
