Stigma, Ableism and Social Identity: Whose Disability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1210.19447Keywords:
persons with disabilities, ableism, stigma, social identity, disability studies, social exlusion, inclusion and diversityAbstract
This article presents a theoretical and critical essay that explores central themes, including stigma, ableism, and social identity, and situates them within contemporary agendas on human rights, inclusion, and social justice. Structured as a historical, conceptual, and comparative review, it integrates classical contributions (Goffman, Oliver, Tajfel, and Turner) with recent literature in Social Psychology, Sociology, and Disability Studies. The analysis highlights how ableism is socially and structurally embedded, shaping persistent barriers to participation and autonomy for persons with disabilities (PwD). By examining the tensions between identity, exclusion, and inclusion, the essay reveals the contradictions that sustain discrimination and marginalization. It also emphasizes the need for critical reflection and structural transformation to mitigate ableist practices and to foster societies that genuinely recognize and value human diversity.
References
Sullivan, L.E., and S. Vilches, Ableism: The causes and consequences of disability prejudice. 2021, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Wendel, S. The Rejected Body: Feminist philosophical reflec’ons on disability. 2013, New York: Routledge.
Goffman, E., S’gma: Notes on the management of spoiled iden’ty. 1963, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Crocker, J., B. Major, and C. Steele, Social s’gma. In: D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, eds. The handbook of social psychology. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998. p. 504-553.
Link, B.G., and J.C. Phelan, Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 2001. 2ti: p. 363–385.
hWps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.2ti.1.363.
Oliver, M., The politics of disablement. 1990, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (A/RES/61/106). hWps://www.refworld.org/legal/agreements/unga/2006/en/90142
Verdugo, M.A., L.E. Gomez, B. Arias, and P. Navas, Family quality of life and individual quality of life: A review of the literature. Interna’onal Journal of Disability, Development and Educa’on, 2010. 5ti(4): p. 35ti–365. hWps://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2010.51ti320
Van Loon, J., G. Van Hove, and K. Scheerlinck, Unpacking the concept of family-centred care in the context of intellectual disability: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabili’es, 2020. 33(5): p. 919–933. hWps://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12691.
Scambiah, H., R. Delbridge, M. Jones, K. Kelly, and L. Thompson, Confronting stigma: A review of the literature and insights for future research. Journal of Social Issues, 2011. 6ti(3): p. 56ti–583. hWps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01ti16.x.
Hesse, M., and A. Boide, Frida Kahlo: a biography. 2018, Porto Alegre: L&PM.
Livingston, J.D., and J.E. Boyd, Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 2010. ti1(12): p. 2150–2161. hWps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030.
Sato, T., and I. Inceoglu, Revisiting the stigma of giNedness: The role of ability beliefs, implicit theories of giNedness, and achievement motivation. Contemporary Educa’onal Psychology, 2019. 56: p. 166–181. hWps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.004.
Dirth, T.P., and N.R. Branscombe, The social identity approach to disability: Bridging disability studies and psychological science. Psychological Bulle’n, 2018. 144(12): p. 1300–1324. hWps://doi.org/10.103ti/bul0000156.
Fenton, A., K. Krmpotich, and A. Fudge Schormans, The normality of doing things differently: Bodies, spaces, and disability geography. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 2019. 63(1): p. 14–22. hWps://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12502.
Tajfel, H., and J.C. Turner, The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel and W.G. Austin, eds. Psychology of intergroup rela’ons. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1986. p. ti–24.
Oakes, P.J., J.C. Turner, and S.A. Haslam, Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. Bri’sh Journal of Social Psychology, 1991. 30(2): p. 125–144. hWps://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x.
Hornsey, M.J., Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2008. 2(1): p. 204–222. hWps://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1ti51-9004.200ti.00066.x.
Oliver, M., and C. Barnes, The new poli’cs of disablement. 2nd ed. 2012, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Forber-PraW, A.J., D.A. Lyew, C. Mueller, and L. Samples, Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilita’on Psychology, 201ti. 62(2): p. 198–20ti. hWps://doi.org/10.103ti/rep0000134.
Guffey, E., ANer universal design: The disability design revolution. 2023, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
Clair, M., C. Daniel, and M. Lamont, Destigmatization and health: Cultural constructions and the long-term reduction of stigma. Social Science & Medicine, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.021. 202
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lavínia Teixeira-Machado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
