Blurring the Line: Digital Anonymity, Deception, and the Crisis of Online Authenticity

Authors

  • Brynn Comes Singapore American School, Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1210.19500

Abstract

The digital age has changed how people present themselves online and perceive representations of the truth. This paper examines how online anonymity, disinformation, and identity reconstruction can undermine authenticity in digital spaces. Today, with over five billion social media users worldwide, the boundary between genuine and manufactured realities has been blurred by the rise of deepfakes, filters, and AI-generated content. This paper explores how anonymity creates conditions where fake content can thrive, accountability is reduced, and digital deception is normalized. It also discusses the motivating factors and consequences of spreading disinformation online. The paper further examines how identity reconstruction through curated personas leads to cognitive dissonance, loneliness, and the potential disintegration of authentic selfhood. Ultimately, it argues that unchecked anonymity and disinformation can pose ethical, psychological, and societal risks that impact digital integrity and democratic stability. Promoting media literacy, enforcing digital accountability, and developing AI-based content verification systems are essential to safeguarding authenticity in an era where online deception is rapidly increasing.

References

Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118

Huang, J., Kumar, S., & Hu, C. (2021). A literature review of online identity reconstruction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.696552

Jesus, S., Costa, A., Simões, G., Dias Dos Santos, G., Almeida, M., & Garrido, P. (2022). YOU'VE BEEN catfished: An exploration of social deception on online platforms. European Psychiatry, 65(S1), S576-S577. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1477

Liu, C., Liu, Y., Liu, C., Lin, R., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Wu, Y., & Wang, D. (2025). The moderated mediating effects of social media identity and loneliness on the relationship between problematic internet use and mental health in china: Nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e57907. https://doi.org/10.2196/57907

McArthur, J., Dunsworth, Z., & Ternes, M. (2023). World wide web of lies: Personality and online deception. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 11, 100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100075

Munusamy, S., Syasyila, K., Shaari, A. A. H., Pitchan, M. A., Kamaluddin, M. R., & Jatnika, R. (2024). Psychological factors contributing to the creation and dissemination of fake news among social media users: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02129-2 134

Comes, B. (2025). Blurring the Line: Digital Anonymity, Deception, and the Crisis of Online Authenticity. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(10). 131-135.

Shu, K., Bhattacharjee, A., Alatawi, F., Nazer, T. H., Ding, K., Karami, M., & Liu, H. (2020). Combating disinformation in a social media age. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1385

Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking. Council of Europe. https://firstdraftnews.com/ wp-content/uploads/2017/11/PREMS-162317-GBR-2018- Report-de%CC%81sinformation-1.pdf?x56713

Downloads

Published

2025-10-19

How to Cite

Comes, B. (2025). Blurring the Line: Digital Anonymity, Deception, and the Crisis of Online Authenticity. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(10), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1210.19500