Cooperative versus Coercive Social Power in Adolescence

Authors

  • Anthony A Volk Brock UniversityDepartment of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University and Department of Psychology, Brock University
  • Andrew V Dane Department of Psychology, Brock University
  • Wendy Craig Department of Psychology, Queen’s Psychology
  • Natalie Spadafora Department of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University
  • Naomi C Z Andrews Department of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University
  • Irene Vitoroulis School of Psychology, University of Ottawa
  • Ann H Farrell Department of Child and Youth Studies, Brock University
  • Laura J Lambe Department of Psychology, St. Francis Xavier University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1209.19332

Keywords:

social power, cooperative social power, coercive social power, adolescence

Abstract

There are two fundamental forms of social power: cooperative (where individuals mutually benefit) and coercive (where the more powerful gains at the expense of the other). Each is composed of two separate aspects: power holding (e.g., being popular) and power-enhancing(e.g., using force). Research has generally studied these two forms of social power in a single measure and without consideration of their combined effect nor examined their combined influence or associations with peer reactions. We therefore used a measure that captured both aspects and forms of adolescent social power as well as to determine their associations with positive and aggressive peer responses. Based on a sample of 559 adolescents, our confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that adolescents viewed each form of social power as being distinct from each other and composed of both power-holding and power-enhancing aspects. We then ran structural equation models that showed cooperative social power was associated with numerous positive peer responses (e.g., friendship, respect) while coercive social power was associated with fewer positive peer responses (e.g., attractiveness, support in a conflict) as well as more aggressive peer responses (e.g., bullying and victimization). Our longitudinal data (collected 6 months later) showed even clearer separation of these associations of these two forms of social power. Overall, our results suggest that researchers should use measures that capture both aspects of social power and that each form of social power has a distinct pattern of associations with peer responses.

References

Fiske, S. T., and Berdahl, J. L. (2007). Social power. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 678–692). Guilford Press.

Andrews, N. C., Cillessen, A. H., Craig, W., Dane, A. V., and Volk, A. A. (2023). Bullying and the abuse of power. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-023-00170-0

Exner-Cortens, D., Baker, E., and Craig, W. (2023). Canadian adolescents’ experiences of dating violence: Associations with social power imbalances. Journal of interpersonal violence, 38(1-2), 1762-1786.

Mutz, D. C., and Simmons, B. A. (2022). The psychology of separation: Border walls, soft power, and international neighborliness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(4), e2117797119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211779711

French, D. C., Shen, M., and Jin, S. (2022). Are adolescent leaders prosocial and aggressive?. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(4), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221100250

Machiavelli, N. (1993). The prince (1513). Wordsworth Editions.

Henrich, J., and Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4 25

Gilbert, P. (1997). The evolution of social attractiveness and its role in shame, humiliation, guilt and therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70(2), 113-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1997.tb01893.x

Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., and Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01708.x

Keltner, D. (2016). The power paradox: How we gain and lose influence. Penguin.

Cheng, J. T. (2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004

Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. Journal of theoretical Biology, 47(1), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(74)90111-8

Axelrod, R., and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396

Bukowski W.M., Buhrmester D., and Underwood M.K. (2011). Peer relations as a developmental context. In: M. K. Underwood & L. H. Rosen L.H. (eds.). Social Development: Relationships in Infancy Childhood and Adolescence. Guilford Press; 2011:153–179

Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene. Oxford university press.

Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560-1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11337

Tong, W., Yang, L., Liu, S., Feng, T., Jia, J., and Zhang, Y. (2023). Popularity goals and bullying behaviors among Chinese adolescents: the moderating roles of popularity status and cognitive empathy. Youth & Society, 55(8), 1501-1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X22111690

Peets, K., & Hodges, E. V. (2024). The interplay between popularity and aggression in adolescence: Focusing the lens on sense of power and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 50(6), e22177.

Caravita, S. C., & Cillessen, A. H. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 376-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x

Grosz, M. P., van Aert, R., and Back, M. D. (2024). A meta-analytic review of the associations of personality, intelligence, and physical size with social status. Psychological Bulletin, 150(3), 253-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000416

Bouma, J., Bulte, E., and Van Soest, D. (2008). Trust and cooperation: Social capital and community resource management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 56(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.004

Axelrod, R. (1980). Effective choice in the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), 3-25.

Körner, R., Overbeck, J. R., & Schütz, A. (2025). Structuring hierarchy concepts: Evaluating measures of power, status, dominance, and prestige on the basis of an integrative model and systematic literature review. Psychological bulletin, 151(3), 322-364.

Goltz, S. M. (2020). On power and freedom: Extending the definition of coercion. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(1), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00240-z

Van den Berg, Y. H. M., Burk, W. J., and Cillessen, A. H. N. (2019). The functions of aggression in gaining, maintaining, and losing popularity during adolescence: A multiple cohort design. Developmental Psychology, 55(10), 2159–2168. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000786

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (1996, January). Friendship and the banker's paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In Proceedings-british academy (Vol. 88, pp. 119-144). Oxford University Press Inc..

Archer, J. (2009). The nature of human aggression. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32(4), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.001

Roisman, G. I., and Fraley, R. C. (2013). Developmental mechanisms underlying the legacy of childhood experiences. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12030

Slobodskaya, H. R. (2021). Personality development from early childhood through adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110596

Vargas, R. (2011). Being in “bad” company: Power dependence and status in adolescent susceptibility to peer influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(3), 310-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272511414546

Garandeau, C. F., and Lansu, T. A. (2019). Why does decreased likeability not deter adolescent bullying perpetrators?. Aggressive Behavior, 45(3), 348-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21824

Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97-132. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470

Van den Berg, Y. H., Lansu, T. A., and Cillessen, A. H. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.07.010

Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 279-309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23096057

Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., and Card, N. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(2), 170-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407074630

Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., and Card, N. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominancerelated beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407084054

Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vink, G., Aleva, L., and van der Meulen, M. (2018). Differences between resource control types revisited: A short term longitudinal study. Social Development, 27(1), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12257

Hartl, A. C., Laursen, B., Cantin, S., and Vitaro, F. (2020). A test of the bistrategic control hypothesis of adolescent popularity. Child Development, 91(3), 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13269

Zhou, W., and McLellan, R. (2021). Examining social status profiles with gender, school attended, SES, academic achievement and wellbeing in urban China. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(7), 1464-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01454-8

Redhead, D., Dhaliwal, N., and Cheng, J. T. (2021). Taking charge and stepping in: Individuals who punish are rewarded with prestige and dominance. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(2), e12581. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12581

Urbaniak, G. C., and Kilmann, P. R. (2006). Niceness and dating success: A further test of the nice guy stereotype. Sex Roles, 55, 209-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9075-2

Arnocky, S., and Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 253-270.

Bower, A. R., Nishina, A., Witkow, M. R., and Bellmore, A. (2015). Nice guys and gals finish last? Not in early adolescence when empathic, accepted, and popular peers are desirable. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 2275-2288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0346-5 27

Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., Volk, A. A., and Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Physical and relational bullying and victimization: Differential relations with adolescent dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive behavior, 43(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21667 Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., Volk, A. A., and Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Physical and relational bullying and victimization: Differential relations with adolescent dating and sexual behavior. Aggressive behavior, 43(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21667

Farrell, A. H., and Vaillancourt, T. (2019). Temperament, bullying, and dating aggression: Longitudinal associations for adolescents in a romantic relationship. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(2), 1474704919847450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919847450

Rebellon, C. J., and Manasse, M. (2004). Do “bad boys” really get the girls? Delinquency as a cause and consequence of dating behavior among adolescents. Justice Quarterly, 21(2), 355-389.

Vermande, M. M., Gilholm, P. A., Reijntjes, A. H., Hessen, D. J., Sterck, E. H., and Overduin-de Vries, A. M. (2018). Is inspiring group members an effective predictor of social dominance in early adolescence? Direct and moderated effects of behavioral strategies, social skills, and gender on resource control and popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1813-1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0830-

Spadafora, N., and Volk, A. A. (2021). Child and Youth Classroom Incivility Scale (CYCIS): Exploring uncivil behaviors in the classroom. School Mental Health, 13(1), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-020-09405-7

Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., and Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407594113011

Laursen, B., Leggett-James, M. P., and Valdes, O. M. (2023). Relative likeability and relative popularity as sources of influence in children’s friendships. PLoS one, 18(5), e0283117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283117

Parker, J. G., and Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611

Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., and Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.195

Farrell, A., and Dane, A.V. (2020). Bullying, victimization and prosocial resource control strategies: Differential relations with dominance and alliance formation. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 14, 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000178

Andrews, N. C. (2020). Prestigious youth are leaders but central youth are powerful: What social network position tells us about peer relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 631-644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01080-5

Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34(4), 327-343.

Prabaharan, N., Dane, A. V., and Spadafora, N. (2024). Balance of Power in Peer Victimization: The Role of Rivalry and Vulnerability. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 170-188.

Wang, S., Lambe, L., Huang, Y., Liu, X., Craig, W., and Zhang, L. (2023). Perceived social competition and school bullying among adolescents: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Current Psychology, 42(28), 24554-24563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03515-y

Park, I., and Cho, S. (2021). Influences of target congruence and lifestyles on victimization trajectories: An autoregressive latent trajectory modeling approach to overlap between bullying and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 92, 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.08.005 28

Andrews, N. C., Hanish, L. D., Updegraff, K. A., Martin, C. L., and Santos, C. E. (2016). Targeted victimization: Exploring linear and curvilinear associations between social network prestige and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1772-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0450-1

Dawes, M., and Malamut, S. (2020). No one is safe: victimization experiences of high-status youth. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0103-6

Van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., Salmivalli, C., and Veenstra, R. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?. Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002

Yang, Y., Liang, W., Zhang, Y., and Wang, C. (2024). The longitudinal effect of peer-nominated popularity on defending behaviors in Chinese adolescents: the moderating role of manipulative traits, desired popularity, and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 53(3), 581-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01927-y

Lambe, L. J., and Craig, W. M. (2020). Peer defending as a multidimensional behavior: Development and validation of the Defending Behaviors Scale. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 38-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.12.001

Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., and Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.07.003

Volk, A. A., Schiralli, K., Spadafora, N., Buchner, K., and Dane, A. V. (2021). Cooperative versus coercive dominance strategies: relations with the environment and personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 7, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00264-8

Booth, A., and Nolen, P. (2012). Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(2), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.07.018

Dreber, A., Von Essen, E., and Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and competition in adolescence: task matters. Experimental Economics, 17, 154-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-013-9361-0

Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S., and McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v19n02_10

Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.

Reynolds, A. D., & Crea, T. M. (2015). Peer influence processes for youth delinquency and depression. Journal of adolescence, 43, 83-95.

Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (2017). Mplus. In Handbook of item response theory (pp. 507-518). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Kline, P. (2015). A handbook of test construction (psychology revivals): introduction to psychometric design. Routledge.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Hawley, P. H. (2014). Ontogeny and social dominance: A developmental view of human power patterns. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(2), 318-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200204

Volk, A. A., Mitchell, R. C., & Khan, T. (2019). The power of civility: A transdisciplinary examination of adolescent social power and bullying. Journal of Childhood Studies, 44(3), 120-138.

Laursen, B., and Hartup, W. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. 29

Charlesworth, W. R. (1996). Co-operation and competition: Contributions to an evolutionary and developmental model. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19(1), 25-38.

Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., and Al-Jbouri, E. (2022). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? A 10-year review. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2351-2378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09703-3

Zwierzynska, K., Wolke, D., and Lereya, T. S. (2013). Peer victimization in childhood and internalizing problems in adolescence: a prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9678-8

Downloads

Published

2025-09-06

How to Cite

Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., Craig, W., Spadafora, N., Andrews, N. C. Z., Vitoroulis, I., … Lambe, L. J. (2025). Cooperative versus Coercive Social Power in Adolescence. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(09), 08–30. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1209.19332