The Voice of Gifted Students on Triggered and Maintained Engagement with Learning at School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1209.19407Keywords:
engagement, giftedness, motivation, autonomy support, structure, student voicesAbstract
Although gifted students might exhibit strong task involvement, their engagement in learning at school is not a given. In this qualitative study, three in-depth case studies were used to explore what, according to the gifted students’ voices, is needed to become and to remain engaged in learning at school. The interview data were analyzed inductively and deductively with an eye toward general patterns and differences that became evident in students’ experiences. The results showed that it is essential for gifted students to be seen to become engaged. Students unfold that the fulfilment of the basic psychological needs and, in particular, the experience of an autonomy-supportive environment is crucial. Moreover, they tell us that both the educational context and themselves can be facilitating or hindering factors. To remain engaged when faced with challenges, gifted students need to feel competent, which requires structure tailored to their needs. Implications for educational practice are discussed.
References
Minnaert, A., & Odenthal, L. (2018). Motivation is a verb. CPS Publishing.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184.
Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A., Heller, F. J., Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 193-202). Pergamon.
Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2018). Engagement and motivation of cognitively strong learners: first results from the TALENT study. KU Leuven.
Beckmann, E., & Minnaert, A. (2018). Non-cognitive characteristics of gifted students with learning disabilities: An in-depth systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00504
Kuipers, J. (2009). Underachievement. In E. van Gerven (ed.), Handbook of giftedness (pp. 166-186). Van Gorcum.
Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2005). Does it make a difference? On educational and special needs care for pupils in education. In E. J. Knorth, A. E. M. G. Minnaert & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Distinguishing differences: 236 Orthopaedic assistance and guidance in problematic parenting and educational learning situations (pp. 43-62). Agiel.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308-317.
Renzulli, J. S. (2006). Swimming up-stream in a small river: Changing conceptions and Practices about the development of giftedness. In M. A. Constas & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice: Developments in Content domains, large-scale reform, and intellectual capacity (pp. 223-253). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mönks, F. J., & Mason, E. J. (2000). Developmental psychology and giftedness: Theories and research, in K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, and R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 141-157). Elsevier.
Peters, W. A. M., Grager-Loidl, H. & Supplee, P. (2000). Underachievement in gifted children and adolescents. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 609-620). Elsevier.
Bizimana, E. (2025). Student engagement in learning: Exploring the role of perceived student cohesiveness, equity, teacher support, and teacher autonomy support under the framework of Self-Determination Theory. International Journal of Changes in Education. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE52024500
Saqr, M., López-Pernas, S., Helske, S., & Hrastinski, S. (2023). The longitudinal association between engagement and achievement varies by time, students’ profiles, and achievement state: A full program study. Computers & Education, 199, 104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104787
Snikkers, S. (2018). Have you seen this child? Lectureship Value(s) of Waldorf Education.
Snikkers-Mommer, S., Hoekman, J., Mayo, A., & Minnaert, A. (2024). Triggered and maintained engagement with learning among gifted children in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1164498
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Ronksley-Pavia, M., & Neumann, M. M. (2020). Conceptualising gifted student (dis)engagement through the lens of learner (re)engagement. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100274
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Student motivation and engagement. Schooling Issues Digest, 2, 1-16.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and the “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Legault, L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1-9). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1162-1
Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2015). Vitamins for growth. Feeding development. From selfdetermination theory. Acco.
Martens, R. (2022). Motivating learners intrinsically. Lannoo Campus. 237
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R.M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263-280.
De Boer, G. C., Opdenakker, M-C. J. L., & Minnaert, A. E. M. G. (2018). Teacher strategies to motivate gifted students: A multiple case study on teacher behaviour. In M. K. Gabrijelčič, & M. S. Željeznov (Eds.), Teaching gifted and talented children in a new educational era (pp. 75-98). University of Primorska.
Stroet, K., Opdenakker, M., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Effects of need supportive teaching on Early adolescents’ motivation and engagement: A review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 9, 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.003
Al-Shabatat, A.M. (2013). A review of the contemporary concepts of giftedness and talent. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 2(12), 1336-1346. http://dx.doi.org/10.12816/0002983
Colangelo, N., & Davis, G.A. (2003). Introduction and overview. In: N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 3-10). Pearson Education, Inc.
Resing, W. C. M., & Drenth, P. J. D. (2007). Intelligence: knowing and measuring. Nieuwezijds.
Snikkers-Mommer, S., Mayo, A., & Minnaert, A. (2025). Giftedness in the picture: what do teachers believe is needed for gifted students to become and maintain engaged for learning at school? Forum For Education Studies, 3(2), 2471. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes2471
Barbier, K. (2022). Teaching high-ability students in mixed-ability classrooms. University of Antwerp, Faculty of Social Sciences. https://hdl.handle.net/10067/1884830151162165141
Hoogeveen, L. (2017). Gifted students: How to find them, how to teach them. Integrazion Scolastica e Sociale, 16, 42-50.
Mathijssen, A. C. S., Hoogeveen, L., & Jen, E. (2021). Professional development in gifted education: Training teachers to meet the needs of gifted students. In M. A. Peters, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of teacher education (pp. 1-5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_449-1
Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Routledge.
Brziak, M., & Urban, K. (2025). Phenomenology meets self‐regulated learning: Exploring the lived experience of learning. Review Of Education, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70063
Lindseth, A., & Norberg, A. (2004). A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 18(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00258.x
Reschly, A., & Christenson, S. L. (2006). Research leading to a predictive model of dropout and completion among students with mild disabilities and the role of student engagement. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276-292.
Steenberghs, N., Lavrijsen, J., & Verschueren, K. (2023). Teacher-student relationships and engagement of high-ability students: An exploration from the perspective of the academic risk hypothesis, High Ability Studies. doi:10.1080/13598139.2023.2189573
Wester, F., & Peters, V. (2009). Qualitative analysis. Principles and procedures. Coutinho.
Baarda, B. (2014). This is research! Noordhoff Publishers.
Delfos, M. (2017). Are you listening to me? SWP.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., Van Eijden, E., Goudsblom, J., & Roskamp, C. (2018). Teacher expectation effects on need-supportive teaching, student motivation, and engagement: A self-determination perspective. Educational Research and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1550841 238
Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., & Suldo, S. M. (2025). Gifted, high achieving, and accelerated mental health through the lens of positive psychology. Gifted Education International, 41(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294241292423
Letschert-Grabbe, B. (2008). Dennis, the terror of the school. How pedagogical work improves the quality of education. Van Gorcum.
Karabenick, S. A., & Newman, R. S. (2006). Help seeking in academic settings. Routledge.
Van Manen, M. (2015). The tact of teaching. Routledge.
Lens, W., & Rand, P. (2000). Motivation and cognition: Their role in the development of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.) International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (2nd ed., pp. 193-202). Pergamon.
Minnaert, A. (2022, September 2). Thinking and acting from possibilities, yes, but don’t forget our double special voice. Keynote lecture presented at the ECHA 2022 congress, World Forum, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Minnaert, A. (2023). An epistemological shift forward. The methodological zone of proximal research on motivation and emotion in learning and teaching. In G. Hagenauer, R. Lazarides & H. Järvenoja (Eds.), Motivation and emotion in learning and teaching across educational contexts: Theoretical and Methodological perspectives and empirical insights (pp. 274-283). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303473-20
Patzak, A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Blending teacher autonomy support and provision of structure in the classroom for optimal motivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-09994-2
Van Dale. (2005). Groot Woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal (14th ed., p. 943). Dale Lexicography. Notes 1. In line with the scientific literature, the English term (dis)engagement was chosen as an externalization of motivation [30]. This is more comprehensive than the Dutch term engagement, which only refers to commitment or involvement [56], or the term boredom/disengagement (as a translation of disengagement). 2. The data, analysis codes, and output are not freely accessible and cannot be shared for privacy reasons. If desired, the data can be requested from the first author upon explicit and reasoned request.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saskia Snikkers-Mommer, Alexander Minnaert, Aziza Mayo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
