The Relationship of Special Education Placement and Academic Outcomes in Southeast Louisiana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1208.19293Keywords:
special education, resource, inclusion, academic achievement, LEAP 2025, Least Restrictive Environment, curriculum, standardized assessmentAbstract
Special education placement is a debate amongst parents, educators, and policymakers. The Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) is a federal law that provides a guiding principle to assist the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) team guidance when considering placement for a student with an exceptionality. Student placement decisions affect school administrators, teachers, parents, and students. The purpose of the mixed methods study was to determine if students with disabilities who were taught in the inclusive setting yielded higher standardized test scores compared to students who were taught in the resource setting. The researcher analyzed the standardized test scores, in the areas of English Language Arts of fourth grade elementary school special education students, excluding the classification of gifted, talented students, and Intellectual Disability-Severe, in southeast Louisiana that participate in the inclusive and resource settings to discover which group of students yielded higher percentage gains. This study favored a quantitative approach that was structured to draw specific, data-driven conclusions about the relationship between student placement and academic achievement. This study also acknowledges that factors such as gender, race, SES, and English proficiency can influence academic outcomes.
References
Alquraini, T., & Dianne Gut, D. (2012). Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: Literature Review. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 42-59. Microsoft Word -not_IJSPv27n1_2012_ (ed.gov)
Baker, E. T., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1995). The effects of inclusion on learning. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 33-35. http://ezproxy.selu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/effects-inclusionon-learning/do cview/224845871/se-2
Cole, C. M., Waldron, N., & Majd, M. (2004). Academic progress of students across inclusive and traditional settings. Mental Retardation: A Journal of Practices, Policy and Perspectives, 42(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2004)42%3C136:APOSAI%3E2.0.CO;2
Derico, V. L. (2017). The impact of inclusion and resource instruction on standardized test scores of special education students (Order No. 10607592). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Social Science Premium Collection. (1957417490). http://ezproxy.selu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/impact-inclusionresourceinstruction-on/docview/1957417490/se-2
Elbaum, B., & Vaughn, S. (2001). School-based interventions to enhance the self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 101(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/499670
Hogan-Young, C. L. (2013). Standardized testing of special education students: A comparison of service type and test scores. [Doctoral dissertation, Electronic Theses and Dissertations]. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1116/ 270
Individuals with Disabilities Act. (2024, November). Sec. 300.114 LRE requirements. Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/b/300.114
Johansen, K. A. (2018). Least restrictive environment and academic growth: A quantitative study exploring the relationship between special education placement and academic achievement (Order No. 10973852). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; Social Science Premium Collection. (2171818032). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.selu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/least-restrictiveenvironme nt-academic-growth/docview/2171818032/se-2
King-Sears, M. E., Stefanidis, A., Berkeley, S., & Strogilos, V. (2021). Does co-teaching improve academic achievement for students with disabilities? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100405
McLeskey, J., Henry, D., & Axelrod, M. I. (1999). Inclusion of students with learning disabilities: An examination of data from reports to Congress. Exceptional Children, 66, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029990660010
McLeskey J., Waldron N. (1995). Inclusive elementary programs: Must they cure students with learning disabilities to be effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 300–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402998064003
Norwich, Brahm. 2014. Recognizing value tensions that underlie problems in inclusive education. Cambridge Journal of Education 44 (4): 495–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.963027
Siperstein, G. N., Norins, J., & Mason, L. H. (2018). The benefits and challenges of inclusive education: Perspectives from the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7), 710-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1416172
Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2020). Exceptional lives: Special education in today's schools (9th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13: 9780136912163
Wakeman, S., Wu, Y.-C., Ghere, G., Johnson, H., Bowman, J., & Clausen, A. M. (2022). Separate school placement trends by category and age for students with extensive support needs (TIES Center Report 105). TIES Center. https://nceo.umn.edu/publications/OnlinePubs/TIESCenter/Report105/default.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brandie Wolsefer, Luke Stedrak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
