Flow Experiences across Multiple Performance Domains

Authors

  • Kristin Mauldin California Baptist University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6767
  • Bailey Thompson
  • Andrea Rubio
  • Yilena Betancourt
  • Gerardo Brana
  • Janeane Hernandez
  • Lindsey Gonzalez
  • Matthew Batherson
  • Rachael Lewin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1207.18979

Keywords:

flow, cognitive flow, performance, autotelic, intrinsic motivation, sport

Abstract

As the construct of flow is currently under revision, the nine dimensions of the Jackson-Marsh Model of flow have been examined more closely. The current study aims to add to this examination by comparing these dimensions across four performance domains: academic, individual sport, spectator sport, and team sport. Participants completed two different flow assessments within one hour following their specified performance activity. One of the assessments measured state specific flow (FSS-2, Jackson & Marsh, 1996). A total of 118 performers participated: academic (n = 26), individual sport (n = 26), spectator sport (n = 32), and team sport (n = 34). Multivariate analysis of variance analyses conducted on the dimensions that represent antecedents of flow (challenge to skills match, clear goals, and unambiguous feedback) revealed less unambiguous feedback for the exam takers (academic) in comparison to the individual sport athletes, spectator sport athletes, and team sport athletes. A multivariate analysis of variance was then conducted comparing dimensions of the experience of flow between activity types. Individual sport athletes experienced higher levels of merging of action and awareness while spectator sport athletes experienced less loss of self-consciousness between the performance domains. Implications of these differences for the flow construct are discussed.

References

Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (158), 1-13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00158/full.

Alameda, C., Sanabria, D. & Ciria, L. (2022). The brain in flow: A Systematic review on the neural basis of the flow state. Cortex, 154, 348-364. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.005.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/2065805

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 15–35). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511621956.002.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815

Jackson, S. (1992). Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4, 161–180. https://doi:10.1080/10413209208406459

Jackson, S., & Eklund, R. (2002). Assessing flow in physical activity: The Flow State Scale2 and Dispositional Flow Scale-2. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24(2), 133–150. https://doi:10.1123/jsep.24.2.133

Norsworthy, C., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. (2021). Advancing our understanding of psychological flow: A scoping review of conceptualizations, measurements, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 147(8), 806-827. doi:10.1037/bul0000337.

Norsworthy, C., Dimmock, J. A., Miller, D. J., Krause, A., & Jackson, B. (2023). Psychological Flow Scale (PFS): Development and preliminary validation of a new flow instrument that measures the core experience of flow to reflect recent conceptual advancements. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 8(2), 309–337. https://doi-org.libproxy.calbaptist.edu/10.1007/s41042-023-00092-8

Swann, C., Driscoll, J., Goddard, S. G., Willis, R., Schweickle, M. J., Fernandes Ribeiro, I. A., Gatt, M., Jackman, P. C., & Vella, S. A. (2022). The Flow-Clutch Scale: Development and preliminary validation in sport and exercise. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 58. https://doiorg.libproxy.calbaptist.edu/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102066

Swann, C., Piggott, D., Schweickle, M., & Vella, S. (2018). A review of scientific progress in flow in sport and exercise: Normal science, crisis, and a progressive shift. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 30, 249-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2018.1443525.

Swann, C., Keegan, R., Piggott, D. & Crust, L. (2012). A systematic review of the experience, occurrence, and controllability of the flow states in elite sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 807-819. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.006.

Tenenbaum, G., Fogarty, G. J., & Jackson, S. A. (1999). The flow experience: A Rasch analysis of Jackson’s Flow State Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 3(3), 278– 294.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Mauldin, K., Thompson, B., Rubio, A., Betancourt, Y., Brana, G., Hernandez, J., … Lewin, R. (2025). Flow Experiences across Multiple Performance Domains. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 12(07), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1207.18979