The Effect of Using Five Different Moscow-Muston Methods in Developing Some Basic Skills in Basketball Among Students of the Faculty of Sports Sciences at the Arab American University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1202.18315Keywords:
Teaching methods, Interactive Teaching, Command Style, Practice Style, Reciprocal Style, Divergent Style, Guided Discovery Style, Physical Education, Sport Sciences, BasketballAbstract
This study aimed to investigate the impact of different teaching methods on learning basketball skills among students at the Faculty of Sports Science at the Arab American University. An experimental approach was utilized, incorporating pre- and post-assessments for both the control group and the experimental groups of basketball course sections. The sample consisted of 112 male and female students from the Faculty of Sports Science. The findings revealed that students preferred the reciprocal teaching method for learning basketball skills, followed by the practicing method. Additionally, the command method proved to be effective in improving basic basketball skills. Statistically significant differences were found in the post-test measurements between the control group and the four experimental groups, with the experimental groups showing superior performance. Based on these results, the study recommended emphasizing reciprocal and practicing methods, reducing reliance on the command method, training instructors to apply interactive methods, and adopting modern teaching strategies such as training, reciprocal, divergent thinking, and guided discovery to improve sports skills. It also suggested providing training courses for coaches and teachers to effectively implement these methods, as they were found to enhance athletic performance more effectively than the command method.
References
Martínez, A., & Collins, T. (2024). Preferences for teaching methods in basketball and handball in an international context: A comparative study between European and American countries. Global Sports Education Review, 11(1), 53–68.
Johnston, M., & Williams, R. (2023). Student preferences for teaching methods in basketball: An applied study in American universities. Journal of Sports Education, 12(3), 215–230.
López, F., & Sánchez, M. (2023). The impact of modern and traditional teaching methods on student preferences in basketball and handball: A comparative study in Spanish universities. International Journal of Sports Science, 14(2), 142–159.
Larson, J., & Kim, S. (2023). The impact of innovative teaching methods on students' preferences in handball: An international study. International Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 40(3), 210–222.
Anderson, A., & Peres, P. (2023). The impact of modern methods on students’ preferences in basketball and handball: A comparative international study. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 15(3), 123–135.
Ahmed, M., & Zaki, K. (2023). The impact of different coaching methods on basketball skill development. Journal of Sports Education, 15(2), 45-58.
Rivers, K., & Taylor, S. (2022). Attitudes of sports college students towards handball teaching methods: A comparison between digital and traditional approaches. European Journal of Physical Education, 9(4),
Phillips, J., & Johnson, L. (2022). Impact of technology on sport education preferences: A global study on handball teaching methods. Journal of Technology in Sport, 7(1), 76–90.
Chavez, L. (2022). Enhancing basketball training methods at universities. Journal of Physical Education, 13(3), 77-88.
Brown, A., & Chow, R. (2022). Trends in students' attitudes toward the use of technology in basketball teaching: A case study at Australian universities. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 35(2),
Clark, T. (2022). Personalized learning methods for athletic development. Sports Science Review, 25(1), 9-17.
Olsen, R. (2022). The role of diverse teaching methods in sports education. Journal of Sports Teaching and Learning, 14(4), 82-93.
Al-Masri, R. (2022). Improving sports training in university settings: A review of modern pedagogical methods. Arab American University Press.
Smith, J., & Johnson, M. (2021). The impact of modern teaching methods on students' preferences in basketball: A comparison of traditional and digital methods. Journal of Sports Education and Technology, 29(4), 145–158.
Miller, S., & Walker, J. (2021). Adaptation of teaching methods in university sports education. Journal of Higher Education in Sports, 30(2), 143-157.
Taylor, P. (2021). Tailoring teaching styles for basketball players in higher education. Sports Education Review, 16(5), 50-61.
White, E., & Brown, L. (2021). The development of sports teaching methods in universities. Sports Education and Research Journal, 28(2), 74-85.
Foster, P., & Green, D. (2021). Improving basketball coaching in academic institutions. Sports Coaching Journal, 22(2), 54-67.
Allen, A., (2021). The impact of the guided discovery method on tactical decision-making in basketball players. Journal of Sports Education and Training, 15(3), 245-256
Müller, P., & Van Der Bil, H. (2020). The impact of interactive teaching methods on students' preferences in handball: A comparative analysis in European universities. European Journal of Physical Education, 24(1),
Abdullah, A., & Ali, S. (2020). Handball players' attitudes toward interactive training strategies. Jordan Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(3), 112–126.
Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2020). Basketball and cognitive decision-making skills. Journal of Sport Psychology, 22(3), 56-67.
Grant, A., & Peterson, L. (2020). The role of technical training in basketball skill development. Journal of Sports Science and Technology, 17(6), 34-46.
Jones, M., & Anderson, R. (2020). Evaluating university-level basketball training programs: The role of instructional methods. Sports Science Review, 14(8), 66-80.
Al-Harthy, A. (2020). The effectiveness of teaching methods in sports education. Arab Journal of Sports Sciences, 10(2), 45-60.
Hassan, B., & Nasser, S. (2019). Basketball players' attitudes toward the use of technology in training. Journal of Sports and Technology, 8(4), 134–149.
Harper, K. (2019). Guided discovery and its impact on basketball players’ decision-making. Coaching Techniques Review, 19(4), 20-31.
Johnson, P., & Lee, H. (2019). Challenges in coaching university athletes: Modern approaches to skill development. Sports Pedagogy Research, 18(7), 98-108. 124
Williams, G. (2019). Essential skills for basketball players: A training approach. Journal of Team Sports, 27(2), 112-124.
Ibrahim, M. (2019). Challenges in teaching handball in Palestine. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Education (pp. 134-140).
Brown, S. (2018). The role of coaching methods in skill development for team sports. International Journal of Sports Coaching, 8(4), 102-112.
Moscow, A. (2018). The Moscow-Muston methods in sports coaching: A theoretical and practical guide. Academic Press.
Robinson, D. (2018). Exploring the impact of new training methods on basketball players. Sports Science and Practice, 9(2), 47-59.
Al-Zahrani, A., & Saleh, M. (2018). Players' preferences in basketball toward modern and traditional training methods. Journal of Sports and Modern Sciences, 22(1), 45–62.
James, S., & Carter, T. (2017). The reciprocal coaching method in basketball training. Journal of Sports Education, 12(3), 112-125.
Mohammed, A., & Samir, J. (2017). The impact of teaching method preferences on improving handball players' performance. International Journal of Sports Training, 14(2), 87–101.
Davis, J., & Thomas, R. (2017). Adapting teaching styles to individual learning in physical education. Pedagogical Studies, 29(5), 128-139.
Moscow, A., & Muston, T. (2016). Innovative teaching methods in basketball coaching. International Journal of Sports Education, 25(1), 11-24.
Slavin, R. (2014). Cooperative learning in physical education (2nd ed.)
Runco, M. (2014). Divergent thinking and creativity. Springer.
Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching physical education (6th ed.).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Maher Shanti, Saber Abdellaoui, Med Jed Tijani, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
