Thai Consumers' Perceptions of Sustainable Food Packaging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1112.18034Keywords:
Consumer perceptions, Eco-Friendly practices, Environmental awareness, Food service industry, Sustainable food packagingAbstract
This study explored Thai consumers' perceptions of sustainable food packaging, investigating factors influencing their awareness, such as environmental consciousness and knowledge of eco-friendly options. Conducted through a structured survey with 800 Thai online food consumers, the research assessed attitudes toward plastic packaging waste, factors guiding the preference for sustainable options, and potential impacts on the food service industry. Findings revealed a substantial surge in Thai consumer interest in sustainable food packaging, driven by heightened environmental awareness. However, a significant gap emerged between consumer demand and the limited availability of sustainable options in the Thai online food sector. Despite growing interest, consumers lacked specific knowledge about diverse sustainable packaging alternatives and their environmental implications. This knowledge gap poses a challenge in aligning consumer aspirations with industry choices and the global sustainability standard such as ISO 14001, FDA guidelines and European Green Deal objectives. The study underscores the need for educational initiatives to enhance consumer awareness of clearing on eco-labeling to educate consumers on the sustainability benefits of the packaging. Bridging this knowledge gap is crucial to aligning consumer preferences with sustainability goals in the food packaging industry partnering with eco-certification bodies to enhance credibility. The research not only identifies trends but offers actionable steps for rising demand for sustainable alternatives, global regulatory push, and technology driven advancements. By implementing these recommendations, business as a leader in sustainability can meet market demands for sustainability, contributing to a more environmentally responsible future in the Thai online food industry regulatory requirements.
References
Anquez, E., Raab, K., Cechella, F., & Wagner, R. Consumers’ perception of sustainable packaging in the food industry: an online experiment. Revista Direitos Culturais, 2022. 17: p. 251-265.
Cam, L. N. T. A rising trend in eco-friendly products: A health-conscious approach to green buying. Heliyon, 2023. 9(9): p. 1-11.
Piracci, G., Boncinelli, F., & Casini, L. Investigating consumer preferences for sustainable packaging through a different behavioural approach: A random regret minimization application. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2023. 86(1): p. 1-28.
Wandosell, G., et al., Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives. Sustainability, 2021. 13(3): p. 1356.
Chirilli, C., et al. Consumers’ awareness, behavior and expectations for food packaging environmental sustainability: Influence of socio-demographic characteristics. MDPI, 2022. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/16/2388
Suksai, S., et al., Cultivating Sustainable Communities: An Advanced Prediction Model for Assessing Environmental and Health Impacts in the Vicinity of Landfill Sites via Multiple Linear Regression and Spatial Web. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2024. 15(4): p. 211-217.
Penwichai, N. Summary Report of Solid Waste Management Situation in Bangkok, 2023. Bangkok: Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. 2023. 170
Thai Ministry of Commerce. Consumer Survey on Environmental Awareness and Behavior in Thailand. Thai Ministry of Commerce Report. 2021.
Thai Green Network. The State of Sustainability in the Food Service Industry in Thailand. Thai Green Network Report. 2022.
Marinho, G., et. al., Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 103: p. 58-68.
Ali, K. M., et. al., Linking Managerial Coaching with Employees’ Innovative Work Behaviors through Affective Supervisory Commitment: Evidence from Pakistan. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2020. 10: p. 11-16.
Green, Z. A., et al., Emotional support received moderates academic stress and mental well-being in a sample of Afghan university students amid COVID-19. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry. 207640211057729.doi: 10.1177/00207640211057729.
Lindh, H., et al., Consumer Perceptions of Food Packaging: Contributing to or Counteracting Environmentally Sustainable Development? Packaging Technology and Science. 2015. 29(1): p. n/a-n/a.
Brennan, L., et al. Age differences in knowledge and awareness of environmental symbols: Implications for sustainability marketing. Journal of Marketing Management. 2021. 37(7-8): p. 718-745.
Susanty, A., et al., Measuring the sustainability of beef supply chain with rapid appraisal for beef supply chain. Veterinary World. 2021. 14(9): p. 2488-2507.
Orzan, G., et al., Consumers’ Behavior Concerning Sustainable Packaging: An Exploratory Study on Romanian Consumers. Sustainability. 2018. 10(6): p. 1787.
Boz, Z., et al., Consumer knowledge and willingness to pay for organic food in Turkey: The role of information sources. International Journal of Food Science. 2020. 57(2): p. 1-11.
Annunziata, E., et al., The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: Evidence from Italian wine industry. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. 171(10): p. 1300-1311.
Trivedi, J. P. Examining the Customer Experience of Using Banking Chatbots and Its Impact on Brand Love: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risk. Journal of Internet Commerce. 2019. 18(6): p. 1-21.
Chen, T.-B., & Chang, C.-H. Green product purchase intention: Impact of green advertising and knowledge about green products. Journal of International Business Research. 2013. 13(4): p 307.
Nguyen, T. T., et al., Green purchasing behavior: The role of health consciousness and environmental concern. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2019. 31(5): p. 469-482.
Rosenstock, I. M. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health education monographs. 1974. 2(4): p. 354-386.
Popovic, I., et al., Factors Influencing Consumers’ Decision to Purchase Food in Environmentally Friendly Packaging: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go from Here? Sustainability. 2019. 11(24): p. 1-22.
Singh, G., & Pandey, N. The determinants of green packaging that influence buyers’ willingness to pay a price premium. Australasian marketing journal. 2018. 26(3): p.221-230.
Ottman, J., et al., Avoiding Green Marketing Myopia: Ways to Improve Consumer Appeal for Environmentally Preferable Products. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2010. 48(5): p. 22-36.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research. 2002. 8(3): p. 239-260.
Young, C. W., et al., Sustainablie consumption: green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development. 2010. 18(1): p. 18-31.
Darby, H., & Galvin, A. Food systems and sustainable consumption: Exploring the links between food, consumption practices and environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. 222: 112854.
Nelson, M., et al., Sustainable food systems: An introduction. Sustainable food systems (pp. 1-22). Academic Press. 2021. p. 1-22.
Alexandra, M. Physical and feasible: Climate change adaptation in Longyearbyen, Svalbard. Polar Record. 2022. 58: e29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247422000079
James, A., et al., Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005. 4(4): CD004690.
Mironova, G. Y., et al., The Conducted Vasomotor Response and the Principles of Electrical Communication in Resistance Arteries. Physiological Reviews. 2023.
Ghisellini, P., et al., Revisiting Keynes in the Light of the Transition to Circular Economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability. 2021. 1: p. 143-171.
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. 50(2): p. 179-211.
Hair, J. F., et al., A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publishing. 2022. Edition: 3.
Hulland, J., et al., Use of partial least swuares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal. 1999. Wiley Blackwell. 20(2): p.195-204.
Hartmann, P., et al., Willingness to pay for packaging with environmental claims: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing. 2019. 83(3): p. 101-119.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bullentin. 1959. 56(2): p. 81-105.
Henseler, J., et al., The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing. 2014. 25: p. 277-319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suppanunta Romprasert, Atsanee Srihachai, Danai Tanamee, Sutthanuch Wiriyapinit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
