The Interrelation between Corporate Governance Practises and the Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in CEMAC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1111.17896Keywords:
Corporate Governance, Microfinance Finance Institutions, Financial Performance, OSS, ROAAbstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between corporate governance tools—specifically board size, board gender diversity, capital structure, ownership structure, and audit—and financial performance of microfinance institutions as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and Operational Self-Sufficiency (OSS). Quantitative data is employed to identify the relationship between the variables. A dataset comprising forty-four microfinance institutes extracted from the Mix Market database for the period 2000 to 2021 is utilised. The research identified correlations between Microfinance Institutions’ financial performance and their board characteristics, capital structure, ownership structure and audit. The exploratory variables all produced significant results. The study identified significant relationships between the examined Corporate Governance practices and the financial performance of microfinance institutions in CEMAC. Capital structure positively influences the ROA and the constructed financial performance index but negatively influences the OSS of microfinance institutions in CEMAC when ownership structure is accounted for and audit is not accounted for. Ownership structure (those which have NGO and NBFI forms) positively influences the ROA and the constructed financial performance but negatively influences the OSS of microfinance institutions to a significant extent. Constructed board characteristics index (board size and board gender diversity) positively influences the ROA and the constructed financial performance index but negatively influences the OSS of microfinance institutions in CEMAC when ownership structure is accounted for and audit is not accounted for. Microfinance size has a positive effect on ROA and OSS but a negative one on the computed finance performance index. When audit is accounted for excluding ownership structure, we conclude that capital structure positively influences the OSS and the constructed financial performance index but negatively influences the ROA of microfinance institutions in CEMAC. The constructed board characteristics index (board size and board gender diversity) positively influences the OSS and the constructed financial performance index but negatively influences the ROA of microfinance institutions in CEMAC when audit is accounted for and ownership structure not. Being audited by large firms leads to a decrease in OSS, an increase in ROA and a general decrease in the constructed financial performance index in microfinance institutions in CEMAC when ownership structure is not considered. This study highlights the significance of corporate governance tools and their effectiveness in the success of organizations.
References
Abdulfattah Mohamed G Khalifa H, Riccardo Natoli; Segu Zuhair (2020). Assessing the Impact of Changes to CG Codes on the Financial Performance of UAE Firms, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting 10(3):47.
Adams, A. and Tewari, D.D. (2017), “Determinants of microfinance outreach in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel approach”, Acta Commercii, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 1–10.
Afrifa, Godfred and Tauringana, Venancio, Corporate Governance and Performance of UK Listed Small and Medium Enterprises (August 13, 2015).
Aggarwal, P. (2013). Impact of Corporate Governance on Corporate Financial Performance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 13, 1-5.
Akbar, S., Kharabsheh, B., Poletti-Hughes, J. and Shah, S.Z.A. (2017), “Board structure and corporate risk taking in the UK financial sector”, International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 50, pp. 101–110.
Akdogan, Y. E., & Boyacioglu, M. A. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: A Case of Turkey. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 6 (2), 187–210.
Akinleye, G. T., Olarewaju, O. M., & Fajuyagbe, B. S. (2019). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance: An Empirical Analysis of Selected Multinational Firms in Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17 (1),
Al-Manaseer, M. F., Al-Hindawi, R. M., Al-Dahiyat, M. A., & Sartawi, I. I. (2012). The Impact of Corporate Governance on the Performance of Jordanian Banks. European Journal of Scientific Research, 67 (3), 349- 359.
Aras, G., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, O. (2010). Managing Corporate Performance: Investigating the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Emerging Markets. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 59 (3), 229-254.
Bakker, A., Schaveling, J. and Nijhof, A. (2014), “Governance and microfinance institutions”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 637–652.
Bassem, B.S. (2009), “Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Mediterranean countries”, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 31–43.
Bhatt, P.R. and Bhatt, R.R. (2017), "Corporate governance and firm performance in Malaysia", Corporate Governance, 17(5), pp. 896-912.
Cadbury, A. (1992), Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee Publishing., London.
Cheng, S. (2008). Board Size and the Variability of Corporate Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (1), 157– 176. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1111.17896 169
Chiu, T. (2015), “Factors influencing microfinance engagements by formal financial institutions”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 143 No. 3, pp. 565–587.
Dalwai, T.A.R., Basiruddin, R. and Abdul Rasid, S.Z., 2015. A critical review of relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: GCC banking sector perspective. Corporate Governance, 15 (1), 18-30.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1), 20-47.
Erhardt, L. N., & Werbel, J. D. (2003). Board of Director Diversity and Firm Financial Performance. Oxford, UK.: School of Management and Labour Relations, Rutgers University Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26 (2),
Friedman, M., & Allen, G. C. (1970). The Counter-revolution in Monetary Theory. First Wincott Memorial Lecture delivered at the Senate House, Institute of Economic Affairs, University of London. London. Retrieved February 25, 2016, from http://www.google.com.
Garba, T., & Abubakar, B. A. (2014). Corporate Board Diversity and Financial Performance of Insurance Companies in Nigeria: An Application of Panel Data Approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 4 (2), 257-
Gill, A., & Mathur, N. (2011). The Impact of Board Size, CEO Duality, and Corporate Liquidity on the Profitability of Canadian Service Firms. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 1 (3), 83-95.
Gohar, R. and Batool, A. (2015), “Effect of corporate governance on performance of microfinance institutions: a case from Pakistan”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, Vol. 51 No. S6, pp. S94–S106.
Golmohammadi, H., Ranjdoost, B., & Cherati, H. (2012). The Impact of Ownership Structure & Board Structure on Financial Performance: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. A Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1 (9), 32-
Gujarati, D.N. (2004), Basic Econometrics, 4th ed., The McGraw-Hill, New York.
Gull, A. A., Saeed, A., & Abid, A. (2013). Corporate Governance and Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Textile Sector of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 7 (22), 2112-2118.
Hartarska, V. (2005), “Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States”, World Development, Vol. 33 No. 10, pp. 1627–1643.
Hartarska, V. and Mersland, R. (2012), “Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions”, European Financial Management, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 218-
Hasan, T., Quayes, S. and Khalily, B. (2018), “Role of governance on performance of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh”, Eurasian Economic Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 1–16.
Hermes, N. and Lensink, R. (2007), “The empirics of microfinance: what do we know?”, The Economic Journal,
Hussain, S., Ahmad, T., & Hassan, S. (2019). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance using GMM. International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 11 (2), 300-316.
Javed, M., Saeed, R., Lodhi, R. N., & Malik, Q. U.-Z. (2013). The Effect of Board Size and Structure on Firm Financial Performance: A Case of Banking Sector in Pakistan. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 15 (2), 243- 251.
Bin, A. K.-N. (2024). The Interrelation between Corporate Governance Practises and the Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in
Kabir, R., & Thai, H. M. (2017). Does Corporate Governance Shape the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance? Pacific Accounting Review, 29 (2), 227-258.
Karaye, Y., I., Ishak, Z., & Che-Adam, N. (2014). The mediating effect of stakeholder influence capacity on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 528 – 534.
Khandker, S.R. (2005), “Microfinance and poverty: evidence using panel data from Bangladesh”, World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 263–286.
Labie, M. (2001), “Corporate governance in microfinance organizations: A long and winding road”, Management Decision, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 296–302.
Labie, M. and Mersland, R. (2011), “Corporate Governance Challenges in Microfinance”, in Armendariz, B. and Labie, M. (Eds.), The Handbook of Microfinance, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, pp. 283–298.
Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance Handbook. Sustainable Banking with the Poor. An Institutional and Financial Perspective, The World Bank, Washington DC.
Mersland, R. and Strøm, Ø.R. (2009), “Performance and governance in microfinance institutions”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 662–669.
Mia, M.A. and Chandran, V.G.R. (2016), “Measuring financial and social outreach productivity of microfinance institutions in Bangladesh”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 127 No. 2, pp. 505–527.
Mia, M.A., Zhang, M., Zhang, C. and Kim, Y. (2018), “Are microfinance institutions in South-East Asia pursuing objectives of greening the environment?”, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 229–245.
MIX Market. (2017), Global Outreach & Financial Performance Benchmark Report, available at: www.themix.org/mixmarket.
Muller, V.-O., Ienciu, I.-A., Bonaci, C. G., & Filip, C. I. (2014). Board Characteristics Best Practices and Financial Performance: Evidence from the European Capital Market. Amfiteatru Economic, 16 (36), 671-683.
Ntim, C. G., & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo-Institutional Framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21 (5), 468– 494.
Page, M. and Spira, L.F. (2016), “Corporate governance as custodianship of the business model”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 213–228.
Queiri, A., Madbouly, A., Reyad, S. and Dwaikat, N. (2021), "Corporate governance, ownership structure and firms’ financial performance: insights from Muscat securities market (MSM30)", Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(2).
Raihan, S., Osmani, S.R. and Khalily, M.A.A.B. (2017), “The macro impact of microfinance in Bangladesh: a CGE analysis”, Economic Modelling, Vol. 62, pp. 1–15. 171
Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of Non-executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16 (1), 5–26.
Rostami, S., Rostami, Z., & Kohansal, S. (2016). The Effect of Corporate Governance Components on Return on Assets and Stock Return of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36 (1),
Saeed, A., Javed, A.Y. and Noreen, U. (2018), “Microfinancing, governance, and performance: a South Asian perspective”, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Vol. 23 No. 46, pp. 247–265.
Shahwan, T.M. and Fathalla, M.M. (2020), "The mediating role of intellectual capital in corporate governance and the corporate performance relationship", International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(4), pp. 531-561.
Sheikh, N.A., Wang, Z. and Khan, S. (2013). The Impact of Internal Attributes of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 23, 38-55.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52 (2), 737–783.
Singh, H., & Harianto, F. (1989). Managemen-board Relations, Takeover Risk and the Adoption of Golden Parachutes. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (1), 7–24.
Tchakoute-Tchuigoua, H. (2014a), “Performance of microfinance institutions: do board activity and governance ratings matter?”, Finance, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 7–52.
Thrikawala, S., Locke, S. and Reddy, K. (2016a), “Board structure-performance relationship in microfinance institutions (MFIs) in an emerging economy”, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 815–830.
Thrikawala, S., Locke, S. and Reddy, K. (2017), “Dynamic endogeneity and corporate governance-performance relationship: lessons from the microfinance sector”, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 44 No. 5, pp. 727–744.
Tilakaratna, G., & Hulme, D. (2015). Microfinance and multiple borrowing in Sri Lanka: another microcredit bubble in South Asia?. South Asia Economic Journal, 16(1), 46-63.
Varshney, P., Kaul, V. K., & Vasal, V. K. (2013). Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Performance: A Study of Select Indian Firms. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3 (4), 341-395.
Wahba, H. (2015). The Joint Effect of Board Characteristics on Financial Performance Empirical Evidence from Egypt. Review of Accounting and Finance, 14 (1), 20-40.
Walls, J., & Hoffman, A. (2013). Exceptional Boards: Environmental Experience and Positive Deviance from Institutional Norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34 (1), 253–271.
Yılmaz, I. (2018). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Relationship: Case of Oman Companies. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 4 (4), 84-106.
Zabri, S. M., Ahmad, K., & Wah, K. K. (2016). Corporate Governance Practices and Firm Performance: Evidence from Top 100 Public Listed Companies in Malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35 (1), 287-296.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anyekezeh Kum-Ngong Bin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
