The Use of Design Thinking in the Development of IoT Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1110.17696Keywords:
Design thinking, IoT project, Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, TestAbstract
One of the difficulties in the teaching and learning of the Internet of Things (IoT) is the lack of exposure to IoT concepts and inadequate teaching methods and tools. The use of Design Thinking (DT) when developing IoT projects can promote solution-based thinking and enhance creativity in problem-solving. The process of DT involves five phases: Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, and Test. The objective of this study was to evaluate the DT tools and process for developing IoT projects. This study involved 22 Information Technology undergraduate students. The Define Problem Statement template, POV template, User Feedback, and Affinity Diagram were among the DT tools introduced to the students. Using a survey form, each student assessed the efficacy of the DT tool and process. Student feedback revealed that the DT process and tools significantly enhanced their understanding of IoT projects. An expert assessment using a DT rubric was also carried out by a lecturer having a master’s degree in information and technology to assess students’ performance using five criteria. Students need to do two rounds of Affinity Diagram activity. The DT rubric results show students’ average scores increased from 2.52 to 3.48, indicating an improvement in students’ IoT project development using DT.
References
Ahmad, F., & Shahril, M. (2024). Developing Socio-Emotional Skills through Design Thinking in IoT Projects: Insights from Malaysian Universities. Journal of Educational Technology and Development, 18(1), 55-72.
Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. (2020). Design thinking applications in teaching programming to gifted students. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(1), 1-30.
Baist, A., & Pamungkas, A. S. (2017). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Computer Programming. VOLT: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 2(2),
Brown, L. (2023). The impact of Design Thinking on educational methodologies. Educational Innovations Journal, 12(4), 45-59.
Chen, X. L., & Zhang, B. B. (2021). Hybrid teaching practice exploration of design thinking and methodology course for the reform of design innovation education. DEStech Trans. Econ. Bus. Manag, 1-8.
Davis, S., & Taylor, J. (2024). Understanding demographic influences in educational settings. Journal of Educational Research, 29(2), 123-138.
He, Z., & Peng, H. (2023). Research on User Experience Design Based on Affinity Diagram Assisting User Modeling–Taking Music Software as an Example. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 516-526). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Hennessey, E., & Mueller, J. (2020). Teaching and Learning Design Thinking (DT): How Do Educators See DT Fitting into the Classroom? Canadian Journal of Education, 43(2), 499-521.
Johnson, M., & Lee, A. (2021). Professional development and qualifications in higher education. Academic Press.
Joorabci, T.T.N., Mostafavi, A.A. (2023). The Mediation Effect of Internet Use Gratification and Internet Usage on Positive Youth Development. Asia Pacific Journal of Youth Studies (APJYS), 2 (1), 49-93
Kadar, R., Wahab, N. A., Othman, J., Shamsuddin, M., & Mahlan, S. B. (2021). A study of difficulties in teaching and learning programming: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(3), 591-605.
Lim, S., & Tan, Y. (2022). Integrating Design Thinking into IoT Education: Case Studies from Malaysian Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Engineering Education, 17(3), 89-103.
Mahmud, A., Yusoff, M. N., & Husin, M. H. (2022). IoT adoption by the young consumer: an extended ASE perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 32(4), 857-889.
Malele, V., & Ramaboka, M. E. (2020). The Design Thinking Approach to students STEAM projects. Procedia CIRP, 91, 230-236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.100 materials affect novice learner’s motivation and programming ability. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178158.3178184
Mamat., S., W., Mahmud, W., A., Azlan, A, A., (2023). The Influence of Protection Motivation to Protect the Security of Personal Data Among Youth. Asia Pacific Journal of Youth Studies (APJYS), 2(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.56390/apjys2023.1.1.8
Mavroudi, A., Divitini, M., Gianni, F., Mora, S., & Kvittem, D. R. (2018, April). Designing IoT applications in lower secondary schools. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 1120-
Mok, H., Lee, M., & Tan, J. (2023). Contextualizing Design Thinking for IoT Projects in Malaysia: Challenges and Opportunities. Malaysian Journal of Technology and Innovation, 22(4), 112-127.
Ng, T., & Ho, J. (2024). Bridging Theory and Practice: Design Thinking in IoT Project-Based Learning. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Education, 25(2), 98-113.
Rahman, A., Ismail, M., & Hassan, N. (2023). The Role of Design Thinking in Enhancing IoT Project Outcomes: Evidence from Malaysian Universities. Asian Journal of Educational Technology, 12(2), 77-92.
Rahman, T. F. B. A., Anuar, N., & Said, R. F. M. (2018, January). How the nature of programming and learning materials affects novice learner's motivation and programming ability. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (pp. 124-128).
Rajashekharaiah, K., Pawar, M., Patil, M. S., Kulenavar, N., & Joshi, G. (2016). Design thinking framework to enhance object-oriented design and problem analysis skill in Java programming laboratory: An experience. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE). pp. 200-205, doi: 10.1109/MITE.2016.048.
Ramos, C. D., & Inocian, R. B. (2022). Design thinking for virtual teaching of world history towards 21st century skills development. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 12(1), 15-33.
Salbiah Zainal, Rasimah Che Mohd Yusoff, Hafiza Abas, Suraya Yaacub, & Norziha Megat Zainuddin. (2021). Review of Design Thinking Approach in Learning IoT Programming. International Journal of Advanced Research in Future Ready Learning and Education, 24(1),28–38.
Smith, R. (2022). Current roles and responsibilities of academic staff. University Press.
Tosi, F., & Tosi, F. (2020). Design thinking and creativity: Processes and tools for new opportunities in people-centred innovation. Design for Ergonomics, 143-159.
Alqahtani, M. M. M., Singh, H., Haddadi, E. A. A., Al-Shibli, F. S. R., & Al-balushi, H. A. A. (2024). Impact of Internet of Things, Cloud Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Capabilities, Digital Innovation, IT Flexibility on Firm Performance in Saudi Arabia Islamic Bank. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(7), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.117.17252.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salbiah Zainal, Rasimah Che Mohd Yusoff, Hafiza Abas, Roslina Ibrahim, Nor Zairah Ab. Rahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
