Minorities, Women, and Radicals in the Discipline of Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.118.17513Keywords:
diversity, inclusion, scholarly socities, blacks, women, radicalsAbstract
The discipline of economics is informally managed in the United States by the American Economic Association (AEA). The AEA’s management of the economics community however was challenged starting in the 1960s by blacks, women, and radicals. Blacks, women, and radical economists each adopted a different strategy towards achieving greater empowerment in the discipline. Black economists created the Caucus of Black Economists and participated in the AEA’s Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economics Profession to encourage that steps be taken towards affirmative action and create a space for the publication of black economic research. Women economists participated in the AEA’s Committee for the Status of Women in the Economics Profession in 1971 to document the number of women in the economics profession, create a network of women economists and those supporting their work, and publish a newsletter containing statistics on representation within the profession and a listing of job openings and candidate availability. Radical economists created the Union for Radical Political Economics in 1968 to serve as a scholarly home for those holding non-mainstream beliefs and undertake the publication of a research journal, and sought some degree of solace from the AEA’s Committee on Political Discrimination. In the documentation of the different approaches taken by these groups, it becomes clear that there is no optimal inclusion strategy and that the barriers to being a recognized economist remain 50 years later.
References
American Economics Association (1972). “Minutes of the Annual Meeting December 28, 1971 New Orleans, Louisiana.” The American Economic Review, 62(1/2), 470-474.
Bronfenbrenner, M. (1970). Radical economics in America: a 1970 survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 8(3), 747-766.
Browne, R.S. (1970). Publisher's Preface to the Inaugural Issue. The Review of Black Political Economy, 1(1), iii-iv.
Browne, R. S. (1993). The Origin, Birth, and Adolescence of the Review of Black Political Economy and the Black Economic Research Center. The Review of Black Political Economy, 21(3), 9-23.
Coats, A. W. (1985). The American Economic Association and the economics profession. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(4), 1697-1727.
Handy, J. W. (2008). The Emergence of the Black Economic Research Center and the Review of Black Political Economy: 1969–1972. The Review of Black Political Economy, 35(2-3), 75-89.
Lee, F. S. (2004). To Be a Heterodox Economist: The Contested Landscape of American Economics, 1960s and 1970s. Journal of economic issues, 38(3), 747-763.
Peabody, G. E. (1971). Scientific Paradigms and Economics: an Introduction. The Review of radical political economics, 3(2), 1-16.
Simms, M. C. (2020). The National Economic Association at 50: Where Have We Come from and Where Are We Going? The Review of Black Political Economy, 47(2), 118-124.
Spratlen, T. (1970). “Statement of Concern of the Caucus of Black Economists to the American Economic Association.” The American Economic Review, 60(2), 528-529.
Williamson, O. (1970). “Annual Business Meeting, December 29, 1969 New York Hilton Hotel, New York, New York.” he American Economic Review, 60(2), 487-489.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thomas Scheiding
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
