An Application of Multinomial Mis-Classification Cost Matrix For A P- To – P Lending Credit Score
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.113.16544Keywords:
Misclassification Cost Matrix, Default Risk, P2, Two-fold Classifier, R PackageAbstract
An emerging new form of online credit for lending, different from traditional sources of finance, such as banks and building societies, where lenders provide loans to borrowers directly is termed as P-P. Many of these credits are unsecured personal loans, thus credit score of loans is vital to regulate the default risk and improve profit for lenders and platforms. Standard two-fold classifiers may not be appropriate in this lending since there are multiple credit classes and misclassification costs vary largely across classes in the lending platforms. Cost Sensitive Classifiers have been studied extensively in this set of lending, but none of them have analyzed this issue from the perspective of multinomial classifications and measured the misclassification costs of different credit grades using actual losses and opportunity costs. The research intends to model credit score in p-p lending as a cost-sensitive multinomial classification problem. A misclassification cost matrix is proposed for credit scoring with a set of equations and models to estimate the costs. A replication study using a publicly available data is conducted to evaluate the performance and validate the usefulness of the proposed misclassification cost matrix with the help of an R statistical package developed to aid the application of the model. The outcomes showed that the cost-sensitive multinomial classifiers can significantly decrease the total cost, which is vital for the p-p survival and profitability.
References
Bachmann, A., Becker, A., Buerckner, D., Hilker, M. K. M., Lehmann, M., & Tiburtius, P. (2011). Online peerto-peer lending-a literature review. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(2), 1–18.
Bahnsen, A. C., Aouada, D., & Ottersten, B. (2015). Example-dependent cost-sensitive decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(19), 6609–6619. doi:10. 1016/j.eswa.2015.04.042
Beling, P., Covaliu, Z., & Oliver, R. M. (2005). Optimal scoring cutoff policies and efficient frontiers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(9), 1016–1029. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602021
Butaru, F., Chen, Q., Clark, B., Das, S., Lo, A. W., & Siddique, A. (2016). Risk and risk management in the credit card industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 72, 218–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.07.015
Chen, N., Ribeiro, B., & Chen, A. (2016). Financial credit risk assessment: A recent review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 45(1), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9434-x
Collier, B., & Hampshire, R. (2010). Sending mixed signals: Multilevel reputation effects in peer-to-peer lending markets. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 197–206). ACM. doi:10.1145/1718918.1718955
Edelberg, W. (2006). Risk-based pricing of interest rates for consumer loans. Journal of Monetary Economics, 53(8), 2283–2298. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.09.001
Florez-Lopez, R., & Ramon-Jeronimo, J. M. (2014). Modelling credit risk with scarce default data: On the suitability of cooperative bootstrapped strategies for small low-default portfolios. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(3), 416–434. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.119
Galloway, I. (2009). Peer-to-peer lending and community development finance. Community Investments, 21(3), 19–23.
Guan, D., Yuan, W., Ma, T., Khattak, A. M., & Chow, F. (2017). Cost-sensitive elimination of mislabeled training data. Information Sciences, 402, 170–181. doi:10. 1016/j.ins.2017.03.034
Guo, Y., Zhou, W., Luo, C., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2016). Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(2), 417–426. doi:10.1016/j. ejor.2015.05.050
Hand, D. J., Whitrow, C., Adams, N. M., Juszczak, P., & Weston, D. (2008). Performance criteria for plastic card fraud detection tools. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(7), 956–962. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602418
Klafft, M. (2008). Peer to peer lending: Auctioning micro-credits over the internet. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Technology and Management. Dubai: IMT.
Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H. V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.030 88
Li, T., Kou, G., Peng, Y., & Shi, Y. (2017). Classifying with adaptive hyper-spheres: An incremental classifier based on competitive learning. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems (pp. 1–12). IEEE
Morente-Molinera, J. A., Mezei, J., Carlsson, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Improving supervised learning classification methods using multi-granular linguistic modelling and fuzzy entropy. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 25(5), 1078–1089.
Santana, P. J., Lanzarini, L., & Bariviera, A. F. (2018). Fuzzy Credit Risk Scoring Rules using FRvarPSO. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 26(Suppl. 1), 39–57. doi:10. 1142/S0218488518400032
Schuermann, T. (2004). What do we know about loss given default?
Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutierrez-Nieto, B., & Lopez-Palacios, L. (2015). Determinants of default in P2P lending. PloSOne, 10(10), e0139427doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139427 2
Wang, H., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2018). Cost-sensitive classifiers in credit rating: A comparative study on P lending. In 2018 7th International Conference on Computers Communications and Control (ICCCC) (pp. 210–213). IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICCCC.2018.8390460
Xia, Y., Liu, C., & Liu, N. (2017). Cost-sensitive boosted tree for loan evaluation in peer-to-peer lending. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 24, 30–49. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.06.004
Xu, J., Chen, D., & Chau, M. (2016). Identifying features for detecting fraudulent loan requests on P2P platforms. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) (pp. 79–84). IEEE.
Zhu, B., Baesens, B., Backiel, A., & Vanden Broucke, S. K. (2018). Benchmarking sampling techniques for imbalance learning in churn prediction. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 69(1), 49–65. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0176-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel K. Bakker, Ong’eta, Oyaro Jackson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
