Gen Y’s Preferences for Learning in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16413Keywords:
Gen Y, Learning Preferences, Workplace, Informal Learning, Flexible Learning, MentoringAbstract
Gen Y born between 1980 until 2000, currently the most important generation in Malaysia's workforce. They stand out from the crowd that they value open communication, look for a positive work environment, and give work-life balance a higher priority. They probably operate well in teams and in groups. Thus, some learning preferences will improve Gen Y's productivity at the workplace. Gen Y employees will continuously deliver excellent work if they are able to develop personally via their work experiences. There is an efficacy level to some learning preferences that may be measured. This study will objectively assess a few helpful learning preferences in order to assist everyone in the workplace in understanding the phenomenon of Gen Y and their learning preferences in Malaysia. The purpose of this article is to help Gen Y employees apply their newfound knowledge to enhance their performance at work. There are three learning preferences such as informal learning, flexible learning, and mentoring that will enhance Generation Y's performance are presented in this study. Since the learning preferences will be the financial investment that drives Gen Y to become extremely effective employees in Malaysia, they are vital for any organization.
References
Van Noy, M., James, H., & Bedley, C. (2016). Reconceptualizing learning: A review of the literature on informal learning.
Eraut*, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education, 26(2), 247-273.
Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (2018). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 393-451). Routledge.
Statista. (2023, August 1). Labor force in Malaysia 2022, by age. https://www.statista.com/statistics/862634/malaysia-labor-force-byage/#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20there%20were%202.76,between%2030%20and%2034%20years
Huizing, R. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & tutoring: Partnership in learning, 20(1), 27-55.
Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., & Erickson, F. (2016). The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in education, 40(1), 356-401.
Cree-Green, M., Carreau, A. M., Davis, S. M., Frohnert, B. I., Kaar, J. L., Ma, N. S., ... & Nadeau, K. J. (2020). Peer mentoring for professional and personal growth in academic medicine. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 68(6), 1128-1134.
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. Y. Y. (2018). Revisiting the definitions and implementation of flexible learning. Innovations in open and flexible education, 3-13.
Bahar, A. M., Islam, M. A., Hamzah, A., Islam, S. N., & Reaz, M. D. (2022). The efficacy of work-life balance for young employee retention: a validated retention model for small private industries. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 12(3), 367-394.
Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., González-López, Ó. R., Buenadicha-Mateos, M., & Tato-Jiménez, J. L. (2019). Work-life balance in great companies and pending issues for engaging new generations at work. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(24), 5122.
Zachary, L. J., & Fain, L. Z. (2022). The mentor's guide: Facilitating effective learning relationships. John Wiley & Sons.
Birkeland, K. F., Davies, T. L., & Heard, C. A. (2019). College mentoring 101: Student preferences and needs. College Student Journal, 53(3), 315-326. 456
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuraida Abu Bakar, Faizah Mashahadi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
