Modelling Fuzzy Analytical Network Process for Sustainability Criteria of Malaysia Higher Education Institutions

Authors

  • Roslina Mohamad Shafi Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus
  • Zamali Tarmudi Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Segamat Campus
  • Norashikin Ismail Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor, Segamat Campus
  • Sharifah Raihan Syed Mohd Zain Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Johor Branch. Kuliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.2.15003

Keywords:

Canonical representation of multiple operations, fuzzy analytical network process (F-ANP), graded mean integration representation, higher education institution (HEI), sustainable development (SD)

Abstract

Sustainable development (SD) plays greater roles in the advancement of Higher Education Institutions (HEI). Yet, criteria for sustainable criteria must be re-defined, specifically in the context of Malaysian HEI. Accordingly, the aim of this study is to identify the sustainability criteria for HEI in Malaysia using Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (F-ANP). Methods used in this study is equipped with Chang’s extent analysis to calculate the local weights for both criteria and sub-criteria based on pairwise comparison evaluations, while the global weights were derived by multiplication operations with the inner dependence weights. Three criteria and nine sub-criteria were identified and analyses thoroughly using six steps of F-ANP for Malaysia HEI sustainability assessment. Based on the numerical results, the sub-criteria “research” scored the highest weights as compared to other sub-criteria, indicating that “research” as the most important contributor to sustain the Malaysia HEI. Meanwhile the total weights score of the overall sub-criteria is 71.60%, which indicates “moderately sustainable” of the entire sustainability range. Overall, the findings suggest that the entire sub-criteria investigated using the extension of AHP are vital in influencing the sustainability of HEI in Malaysia. The study implies that “research” should be given more focus, which in turn leads to greater institutional visibility and reputation.

References

Velazquez, L., Munguia, N., Platt, A., & Taddei, J. (2006). Sustainable university: what can be the matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.008

Adomßent, M., Fischer, D., Godemann, J., Herzig, C., Otte, I., Rieckmann, M., & Timm, J. (2014). Emerging Areas in Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development - Management Education, Sustainable Consumption and Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 1–7.

Boström, M., Andersson, E., Berg, M., Gustafsson, K., Gustavsson, E., Hysing, E., … Öhman, J. (2018). Conditions for Transformative Learning for Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Review and Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124479

Freidenfelds, D., Kalnins, S. N., & Gusca, J. (2018). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect temperature function for a long-term heat Gusca demand forecast Silvija Nora district does environmentally sustainable higher education What does environmentally sustainable higher institution mean ? Energy Procedia, 147, 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.031

Velazquez, L., Munguia, N., & Sanchez, M. (2005). Deterring Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions: An Appraisal of the Factors which Influence Sustainability in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510623865

Borgnäs, K. (2016). The policy Influence of Sustainability Indicators: Examining Use and Influence of Indicators in German Sustainability Policy Making. German Politics, 25(4), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2016.1193160

Filho, W. L., Manolas, E., & Pace, P. (2015). The Future We Want-Key Issues on Sustainable Development in Higher Education after Rio and the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2014-0036

Abdullah Saleh, A., Haron, S. N., Ahmad, N. A., & Ali, N. E. (2018). Measurement Model of Critical Success Factors for Energy Management in Malaysian University. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 5(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v5i2.5617

Husaini M.Z & Jusoh A.(2017). The Review of Sustainability Model and Indicator for Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences.,7(11).

Foo, K. Y. (2013). A Vision on the Role of Environmental Higher Education Contributing to the Sustainable Development in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61(December 2013), 6–12.

Kohl, K., Hopkins, C., Barth, M., Michelsen, G., Dlouha, J., Razak, D.A., Abidin Bin Sanusi, Z., & Toman, I. (2022), A Whole -Institution Approach towards Sustainability: A Crucial Aspect of Higher Education's Individual and Collective Engagement with the SDGs and Beyond. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0398

Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

Leal, W., Ruiz, V., Lange, A., Londero, L., Pallant, E., Klavins, M., … Vaccari, M. (2019). The role of higher education institutions in sustainability initiatives at the local level, 233, 1004–1015.

Filho, W. L., Dinis, M. A. P., Sivapalan, S., Begum, H., Ng, T. F., Al-Amin, A. Q., Alam, G. M., Sharifi, A., Salvia, A. L., Kalsoom, Q., Saroar, M., & Neiva, S. (2022). Sustainability Practices at Higher Education Institutions in Asia. Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(6), 1250–1276. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2021-0244/full/html

Saadatian, O., Sopian, K. Bin, & Salleh, E. (2013). Adaptation of Sustainability Community Indicators for Malaysian Campuses as Small Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 6, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2012.08.002

Salleh, M. I., Habidin, N. F., Nor, K. M., & Zakaria, S. Z. S. (2019). The Development of Higher Education for Sustainable Development Model (HESD): Critical Success Factors, Benefits, and Challenges. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6434

Mcmillin, J., & Dyball, R. (2009). Developing a Whole-of-University Approach to Educating for Sustainability: Linking Curriulum, Research and Sustainable Campus Operations. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820900300113

Lukman, R., Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2010). University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 619–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015

Waheed, B., Khan, F. I., & Veitch, B. (2011). Developing a Quantitative Tool for Sustainability Assessment of HEIs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111168278

Lozano, R., & Young, W. (2013). Assessing Sustainability in University Curricula: Exploring the Influence of Student Numbers and Course Credits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.032 201

Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., & Stacherl, B. (2018). Assessing the Impacts of Higher Education Institutions on Sustainable Development- An Analysis of Tools and Indicators. Sustainability, 11(59). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010059

Wu, H.-Y., & Khong-Khai, S. (2016). The Critical Factors Affecting Campus Sustainability Using Fuzzy Delphi Method. In International Conference on Sustainable Energy, Environment and Information Engineering (pp. 201–206). https://doi.org/10.12783/dteees/seeie2016/4525

Gomesgutierrez, D., & Sepulveda, J. A. M. (2017). Sustainability Indicators for Universities: Revision for a Colombian Case. Global Journal of Researches in EngineeringL General Engineering, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3038310

Ozdemir, Y., Kayapinar, S., & Turhan, E. (2020). A scale to measure sustainable campus services in higher education : “ Sustainable Service Quality .” Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118839

Mahat, H., & Idrus, S. (2016). Education for Sustainable Development in Malaysia: A Study of Teacher and Student Awareness. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society & Space, 12(6), 77–88.

Krishnaswamy, J., Hossain, Z., Kavigtha, M. K., & Nagaletchimee, A. (2019). What Matters for Higher Education Success of Private Educational Institutions? Senior Students' Perceptions in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 11(3), 616-635. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0142

Perello-Marín, M. R., Ribes-Giner, G., & Díaz, O. P. (2018). Enhancing Education for Sustainable Development in Environmental University Programmes: A Co-Creation Approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010158

Francisco,U.G.,Caesar S.N., Solange R.L., & Vartan, I.M.(2015). Adaptable model for assessing Sustainability in Higher Education.Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 407-414.

Chou, Ch. Ch. (2003). The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 45,1601 – 2610.

Rashid, A. A. (2015). Measuring sustainability cities and community wellbeing through the Malaysian urban rural national indicators network (MURNInets). Retrieved on October 27, 2019 from file:///C:/Users/USER/Downloads/MALAYSIAN_URBAN-RURAL_NATIONAL_INDICATOR.pdf

Kumru, M. & Kumru, P. Y. (2015). A fuzzy ANP model for the selection of 3D coordinatemeasuring machine. J. Intel., Manuf., 26(5), 999-1010.

Vinodh, S. Ramiya, R. A. & Gautham, S. G. (2011). Application of fuzzy network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organisation, Expert System Applications, 38(1), 272- 280.

Babihabib, M.E. Hashem, F. & Shabestari, M. H. (2016). A framework for sustaianble strategic planning of water demand and supply in and region, Sust. Dev., 1099 – 1719.

Chang S.C.,Lin, C. F. Wu, W. M. (2016). The feature and the marketability of certificates for occupational safety and healty manegement in Taiwan, Safety Sci., 85, 77-87.

Najafinasab, F. Karbassi, A. R. & Ghoddousi, J. (2015). Fuzzy analytic network process approach to evaluate land and sea criteria for land use planning in coastal areas, Ocean Coasta Manag., 116, 368-381.

Uygun, O., Kacamak, H. & Kahraman U.A. ( 2015). An integrated DEMATEL and Fuzzy ANP techiques for evaluation ansd selection of outsourcing provider for a telecominication company. Compt. Ind. Eng., 86, 137-146.

Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Abdullah, L., Othman, M, Tarmudi, Z. & Low, W. J. (2018). Fuzzy analytic network process for determining weights of sustainable development criteria, International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 39(3),77 – 90.

Wang, X. Liu, Z. & Cai, Y. (2015). A rating based fuzzy analytic network process (F-ANP) model for evaluation of ship maneuverability. Ocean Eng., 106, 39-46

Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of extent analysis method on fuzzy ANP. Euro., J. Oper. Res., 95(3), 649 – 655.

Yuksel, I. & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC). A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert. Sys. Appl., 37(2), 1270-1278.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-29

How to Cite

Shafi, R. M., Tarmudi, Z., Ismail, N., & Zain, S. R. S. M. (2023). Modelling Fuzzy Analytical Network Process for Sustainability Criteria of Malaysia Higher Education Institutions . Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(6.2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.2.15003