Challenges Faced by Part-Time Doctoral Students in Managing Psychological Well-being: A Qualitative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.2.15010Keywords:
Psychological Well-being, Part-Time doctoral students, Internal Challenge, External ChallengeAbstract
The emergence of alarming statistics on Psychological Well Being (PWB) among doctoral students has received critical attention in the media and across the higher education sectors. Complex work in the doctoral journey has been perceived to be draining thus affecting students’ well-being which could lead to mental depression. Understanding relevant challenges in managing PWB could be a prime opportunity for intervention strategies in managing PWB among part-time doctoral students. This paper hopes to contribute to the dearth of studies of PWB on part-time doctoral students, particularly in Malaysia. A qualitative study would uncover detailed accounts and underlying issues on the challenges of managing PWB faced by part-time doctoral students in Malaysia. Purposive sampling and snowball sampling were used in this study. Five part-time doctoral students were selected and invited to participate in the semi-structured interview. The participants expressed their PWB by describing their experience in the doctoral journey. This study's findings concluded on two main themes involved in maintaining PWB; internal and external challenges. Personal occurrences represent the internal challenge, whereas the internal environment and academic process represent the sub-themes under external challenges. It is essential for doctoral students to focus on their personal occurrences especially maneuvering things that are within their control and dealing with external challenges in managing PWB during the doctoral journey.
References
Houben, M., et al., The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2015. 141(4): p. 901.
Stubb, J., et al., Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students' experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 2011. 33(1): p. 33-50.
Schmidt, M. and Hansson, E., Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2018. 13(1): p. 1508171.
Jackman, P. C., et al., Mental health and psychological wellbeing in the early stages of doctoral study: a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 2021. 12(3): p. 293-313.
Jackman, P. C., et al., Developing inductions to support mental health and wellbeing in doctoral researchers: findings from a qualitative co-design study with doctoral researchers and university stakeholders. European Journal of Higher Education, 2021. 13(1): p. 62-79.
Ch'ng, B., et al., Psychological Flourishing of Postgraduate Students in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 2022. 36(1).
Cornwall, J., et al., Stressors in early-stage doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 2019. 41(3): p. 363-380. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.2.15010 95
Scott, H. and Takarangi, M. K., Measuring PhD Student’s Psychological Well-being: Are we seeing the whole picture?. Student Success, 2019. 10(3): p. 14-24.
Metcalfe, J., et al., Exploring wellbeing and mental health and associated support services for postgraduate researchers, 2018, The Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited: Cambridge, UK.
Moberg, D. O., The development of social indicators for quality of life research. Sociological Analysis, 1979. 40(1): p. 11-26.
McCray, J. and Joseph-Richard, P., Doctoral students’ well-being in United Kingdom Business Schools: A Survey of Personal Experience and Support Mechanisms. The International Journal of Management Education, 2021. 19(2): p. 1-17.
Hazell, C. M., et al., Understanding the mental health of doctoral researchers: a mixed methods systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 2020. 9(1): p. 1-30.
Benjamin, S., et al., Focusing the lens to share the story: Using photographs and interviews to explore doctoral students’ sense of well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2017. 12: p. 197.
Jackman, P. C. and Sisson, K., Promoting psychological well-being in doctoral students: a qualitative study adopting a positive psychology perspective. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 2021. 13(1): p. 19-35.
Wei, J., et al., Handling the loss of innocence: first-time exchange of writing and feedback in doctoral supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 2019. 38(1): p. 157- 169.
Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D., Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Fifth edition, 2018. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J., Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.), 2004. Sage Publications, Inc.
Mohajan, H. K., Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 2018. 7(1): p. 23-48.
Patton, M., Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 2002. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Palinkas, L. A., et al., Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 2015. 42: p. 533-544.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R., Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach 8th Edition, 2019. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Busher, H. and James, N., Qualitative interviewing in cyberspace. Handbook of qualitative research, 2012. 223-240.
Glaser, B. G., et al., The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 1968. 17(4): p. 364.
Hunger, I. and Müller, J., Barney G. Glaser/Anselm L. Strauss: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing Company: Chicago 1967, 271 S. (dt. Grounded Theory. Strategien qualitativer Forschung, Bern: Huber 1998, 270 S.). Klassiker der Sozialwissenschaften: 100 Schlüsselwerke im Portrait, 2016. p. 259-262.
O’Connor, C. and Joffe, H., Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2020. 19: p. 1609406919899220.
Bradbury‐Jones, C., et al., The state of qualitative research in health and social science literature: a focused mapping review and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2017. 20: p. 627 -645.
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm. Naturalistic Inquiry, 1985. p. 14-46.
Noble, H.R. and Smith, J., Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 2015. 18: p. 34 - 35.
Nasrabad, R.R., Criteria of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences, 2018. 6: p. 493-499.
Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L., Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 2000. 39(3): p. 124-130.
Rippere, V., Human Helplessness. Theory and Applications. J. Garber and MEP Seligman (Eds), London: Academic Press, 1980, pp. xvii+ 402. Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 1983. 11(2): p. 188-189.
Okoro, C., et al., The developmental trajectory of a decade of research on mental health and well-being amongst graduate students: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022. 19(9): p. 4929
McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C., Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 2009. 31(2): p. 109-125.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rahayu Ab Rashid, Umi Nazira Rafie, Nur Sakinah Ramli, Muhd Fariduddin Athar Mohd Noor, Sharizan Sharkawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
