Comparison of the Efficacy of Metacognition on Students’ Academic Performance Between Usa, France, Australia, and China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.14833Keywords:
Academic performance, Comparison, Efficacy, Metacognition, Emotional Engagement, Behavioral Engagement, Achievement, StudentsAbstract
pPrior research has emphasized the importance of metacognition as a contributing factor to increasing student retention at colleges and universities. Enhancing students' awareness of their cognitive skills is just as crucial. As students transition from a frequently controlled and encouraging high school setting to an uncontrolled university or college environment where they are expected to become extremely self-directed and autonomous, it is crucial that they quickly develop the skills and insights needed to become independent learners. However, many college students are ill-equipped to deal with the difficulties and challenges their academic environment presents, affecting their metacognitive skills. Metacognition is the capacity to track and manage thoughts and learning. This research reviewed and compared metacognition studies conducted on students in Australia, China, France, and the USA. These studies used self-regulated learning, self-efficacy, and meta-learning factors to evaluate metacognition performance among undergraduate students, including 362 participants in the USA, 128 in Australia, 118 in France, and 517 in China. Results revealed a positive impact of metacognition skills on all students, increasing their academic performance. However, compared to the participants in China, the results revealed that the overall effect size of self-regulated learning on academic achievement in the USA, France, and Australia was small because the Chinese students learned those metacognition habits at a very young age. The results also indicated that their beliefs contributed significantly to learning outcomes./pReferences
Chick, N. (2013). Metacognition. Vanderbilt university center for teaching. Retrieved November 29, 2022, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/ metacognition/.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. ContemporaryEducational Psychology,19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.
Wagener, B. (2016). Metacognitive Monitoring and Academic Performance in College. College Teaching, 64 (2): 47–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1116056.
Yang, C. and Bai, L. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies by Chinese Ph.D. students of social sciences in Australian universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 97:43-52.
Wang, C., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Chang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2012). Chinese College Students' Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Learning English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Research in Education, 22, 103-135.
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653−684.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). “Theories of Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis.” In Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives, edited by B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk, 1–37. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A. Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). “Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14 (1): 4–58.
Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). “What Makes a Good Student? How Emotions, Self-regulated Learning, and Motivation Contribute to Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology; 106 (1): 121–131.
van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., & Torenbeek, M. (2010). “‘It’s Almost a Mindset that Teachers Need to Change’: First‐year Students’ Need to be Inducted into Time Management.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (7): 777–791. doi:10.1080/03075070903383211. 264
Allgood, W. P., V. J. Risko, M. C. Alvarez, M. M. Fairbanks, R. Flippo, and D. Caverly. 2000. “Factors that Influence Study.” In Handbook of College Reading and Study Strategy Research, edited by R. F. Flippo and D. C. Caverly, 201–219. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boud, D. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven Propositions for Assessment Reform in Higher Education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). “The Effect of Distributed Monitoring Exercises and Feedback on Performance, Monitoring Accuracy, and Self-Efficacy. “Metacognition Learning 1: 159–79.
Schraw, G. (1994). The effect of knowledge on local and global monitoring. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 143-154.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Educational Research and Evaluation, 10(2),
Young, A. and Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.
Askell-Williams, H., Lawson, M. & Murray, Harvey, R. (2007). ‘What happens in the university classes that help me to learn?’: Teacher education students’ instructional metacognitive knowledge. International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1. 1-21.
Borkowski, J., Carr, M., & Pressely, M. (1987). “Spontaneous” strategy use: Perspectives from metacognitive theory. Intelligence, 11, 61-75.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research; 65, 245-281.
Ellis, R. (1989). Second language learning and second language learners: Growth and diversity. TESL Canada Journal, 7, 74-94.
Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (2000). Instructional metacognitive knowledge: A qualitative study on conceptions of freshmen about instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 421-444.
Isaacson, R. M. & Fujita, F. (2006). Metacognitive knowledge monitoring and self- regulated learning: Academic success and reflections on learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6, 39-
Nelson, T.O. & Dunlosky, J. (1991). The delayed-JOL effect: When delaying your judgments of learning can improve the accuracy of your metacognitive monitoring. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. W. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pintrich, P. R., Walters, C., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self- regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43 - 97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Sternberg, R. J. (1984). What should intelligence tests test? Implications for a triarchic theory of intelligence for intelligence testing. Educational Researcher, 13, 5-15.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Inside intelligence. American Scientist, 74, 137-143.
Taylor, S. (1999). Better learning through better thinking: Developing students’ metacognitive abilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 30, 1, 34-45.
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2000). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.). Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 147-222). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2002). Knowing what you know and what you don’t: Further research on metacognitive knowledge monitoring. College Board Report No. 2002-3. College Board, NY.
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp 277-
Steinberg, I., Bohning, G., & Chowning, F. (1991). Comprehension monitoring strategies of non-proficient college readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 30 (3), 63–75.
Maki, R. (1998). Test predictions over test material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117–144).
Commander, N. E., & Stanwyck, D. J. (1997). The illusion of knowing in adult readers: Effects of reading skills and passage length. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 39–52.
Meyers, J., Lytle, S., Palladino, D., Devenpeck, G., & Green, M. (1990). Think-aloud protocol analysis: An investigation of reading comprehension strategies in fourth- and fifth-grade students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 112-127.
Artzt, A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1992). Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem-solving in small groups. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 137-
Olshavsky, J. E. (1976–1977). Reading as problem-solving: An investigation of strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 12 (4), 654–764.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem-solving. In Resnick (Ed.): The Nature of Intelligence (pp. 231-235). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert, F.E. and Kluwe, R.H., Eds., Metacognition, motivation and understanding, Hillsdale, 65-116.
Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–38.
Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 131 – 142.
Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educ. Psychol. 22: 255–278.
Jansen, M., Scherer, R., & Schroeder, S. (2015). Students' self-efficacy in the context of academic achievement. Journal of Psychology, 149(5), 495-514.
Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. M. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.
Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), the Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 125-141). New York: Academic Press.
Otani, H., & Widner, R. L., Jr. (2005). Metacognition: New issues and approaches. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 329-334.
Pereira-Laird, J., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 18, 185-235.
Schraw, G. (1997). The effect of generalized metacognitive knowledge on test performance and confidence judgments. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 135- 146.
Sungur, S. (2007). Contribution of motivational beliefs and metacognition to students‟ performance under consequential and non-consequential test conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 127-
Hertzog, C., & Robinson, A. E. (2005). Metacognition and Intelligence. In Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (Ed.). Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Garofalo, J., & Lester Jr, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, 163-176. doi: 10.2307/748391.
Romainville, M. (1994). Awareness of cognitive strategies: The relationship between university students’ metacognition and their performance. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 359-366. doi:10.1080/03075079412331381930.
McCrindle, A. R., & Christensen, C. A. (1995). The impact of learning journals on metacognitive and cognitive processes and learning performance. Learning and Instruction, 5, 167-185. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00010-Z
Schleifer, L. L., & Dull, R. B. (2009). Metacognition and performance in the accounting classroom. Issues in Accounting Education, 24, 339-367. doi: 10.2308/iace.2009.24.3.339
Young, A., & Fry, J. D. (2012). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1-10.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). “The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner 451–502. San Diego: Academic Press.
Azavedo, R. & Witherspoon, A. M. (2009). “Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia.” In Handbook of Metacognition in Education, edited by A. Graesser, J. Dunlosky, & D. Hacker, 319–39. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Strain, A., Azavedo, C., R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2013). “Using a False Biofeedback Methodology to Explore Relationships between Learners’ Effect, Metacognition, and Performance.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 38: 22–39.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Front. Psychol., 8, 422.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). “Becoming a Self-regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
Winne, P. H. (2010). “Improving Measurements of Self-regulated Learning.” Educational 267 Psychologist 45 (4): 267–276.
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, P. H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programs.Educ.Res.Rev.3,101–129.doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003.
Paris, S. G., and Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self- regulated learning. Educ. Psychol. 36, 89–101. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3 602_4.
Sadati, S., & Simin, S. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive and self- regulated learning strategies with learners’ L2 learning achievement. Int. J. Res. Stud. Lang. Learn. 5, 97–106. doi: 10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1267.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self- regulated learning. Int. J. Educ. Res., 31, 459–470. doi: 10.1016/S0 883-0355 (99)00015- 4.
Liu, R. D., & Chen, Q. (2000). The mediate influence of online self-regulated learning activities on the learning outcomes in different learning situations. Acta Psychol. Sin., 32, 197–202.
Li, H. X., Lin, X., & Si, J.W. (2015). The relationship between time management disposition and academic achievement in boarding primary school students: The mediating role of self-regulated learning. Psychol. Res. 8, 90–96.
Chen, M. G., & Hu, Z. B. (2008). Research on the relationships among goal orientation, learning strategy, attribution, and academic performance in high school students. Psychol. Explorat. 28, 58–62.
Zhang, J., Liu, J. W., and Wu, Q. L. (2012). A model of goal achievement orientation, self-efficacy, metacognition, and academic performance. Psychol. Res., 5, 85–88.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull., 138, 353–387. doi: 10.1037/a0026838.
Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at selfregulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Li, J., Pang, B., Zhang, B., & Du, H. (2011). Self-regulation: From basic theories to applications. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. 2011, 5–13. doi: 10.1190/1.3659042.
Bandura, A. (1997). “Self-Efficacy and Health Behavior”, in J R Baum, A S Newman, J Wienman, et al. (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health, and Medicine, pp. 160-162, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bandura, A. (1999). “Social Cognitive Theory: An Argentic Perspective”, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 21-41.
Bandura, A. (2003). “On the Psychosocial Impact and Mechanisms of Spiritual Modeling”, International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, Vol. 13, pp. 167-173.
Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style, and self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 375-388.
Lee, J. C. K., Lee, S. Y., & Bong, M. (2014). Testing interest and choice motivation as mediators of the relationship between situational appraisals and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(2),
Luszczynska, A., Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (2004). Self-efficacy and perceived controllability in health behavior: A cross-cultural study. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self- efficacy: Thought control of the action. Psychology Press., pp. 217-233.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON., pp. 35-37.
Snyder, C. R. (2000). Hypothesis: There is hope. In C. R. Snyder (Ed.), Handbook of Hope: Theory, measures, and applications (pp. 3-21). Academic Press.
Dixson, D. D. (2017). The relationship between hope and first-year college retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 19(2), 155-168.
Feldman, D. B., & Kubota, M. (2015). Hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and academic achievement: Distinguishing constructs and levels of specificity in predicting college grade-point average. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 210-216.
Rand, K. L., Martin, A. D., & Shea, A. M. (2011). Hope, but not optimism, predicts the academic performance of law students beyond previous academic achievement. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 683-
Stephanou, G. (2012). Hope, academic self-efficacy, procrastination, and academic performance: An integrated model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 539-553.
Bandura, A. (1995), “Self-Efficacy”, in Manstead, A. S. R. and Hewstone, M. (Eds.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, pp. 453-454, Blackwell, Oxford.
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Sage Publications, Inc.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1994). Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 364-369.
Jackson, N. (2004). “Developing the Concept of Meta-learning.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41 (4): 391–403. doi:10.1080/1470329042000276995.
Boström, L., & Lassen, L. M. (2006). “Unraveling Learning, Learning Styles, Learning Strategies and Metacognition.” Education and Training; 48 (2/3): 178–189.
Winters, T. (2011). “Facilitating Meta-learning in Art and Design Education.” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(1), 90–101.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). “The Role of Meta-Learning in Study Processes.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 55 (3): 185–212.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). “Attaining Self-regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective.” In Handbook of Selfregulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, C. Wylie, (eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 219–236. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.14833 269
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 35–54.
Al-Harthy, I. S. and Was. C. A. (2010). Goals, efficacy, and Metacognitive self- regulation: A path analysis. International Journal of Education; 2(1): 1-22.
Ward, R.T. and Butler, D. (2019). An Investigation of Metacognitive Awareness and Academic Performance in College Freshmen. Metacognitive Awareness in College Freshmen. Education; 139(3):
Colthorpe, K., Sharifirad, T., Ainscough, L., Anderson, S., & Zimbardi, K. (2018). Prompting undergraduate students’ metacognition of learning: implementing ‘meta- learning’ assessment tasks in the biomedical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43 (2): 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1334872.
Li, J., Ye, H., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Hu, X. (2018). What Are the Effects of Self- Regulation Phases and Strategies for Chinese Students? A Meta-Analysis of Two Decades Research of the Association Between Self-Regulation and Academic Performance. Front. Psychol., 9, 2434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg .2018.02 434.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Wang, C., Hu, J., Zhang, G., Chang, Y. and Xu, Y. (2012). Chinese College Students' Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Learning English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Research in Education, 22, 103-135.
Wang, C., & Pape, S. (2005). Self-efficacy and self-regulation in learning English as a second language. The CATESOL Journal, 17(1), 76-90.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23,
Oxford R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Boston.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2005). SPSS Amos 6 User’s Guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation.
Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. Los Angeles: Sage.
Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71-86.
Kim, D., Kim, B., Lee, K., Park, J., Hong, S., and Kim, H. (2008). Effects of cognitive learning strategies for Korean Learners: a meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 9, 409– 422. doi: 10.1007/BF03025659.
Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., and Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput. Educ. 104, 18–33. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001.
Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educationa Psychology Review, 18, 267-286.
Pape, S., & Wang, C. (2003). Middle school children’s strategic behavior: Classification and relation to 270 academic achievement and mathematical problem-solving, Instructional Science, 31, 419-449.
Shih, S., & Alexander, J. M. (2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other referenced feedback on children’s self-efficacy and cognitive skill development within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 536-543.
Wang, C., Wang. L., & Li, Y. (2007). Chinese secondary school self-regulated learners of English. Paper presented at TESOL (Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages) 2007 Convention, Seattle, WA. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 65-
Bogdanović, I., Obadović, D.Ž., Cvjetićanin, S., Segedinac, M., & Budić, S. (2017). Students’ metacognitive awareness and physics learning efficiency and correlation between them. Eur. J. Phys. Educ.; 6(2), 18–30.
Abdellah, R. (2015). Metacognitive awareness and its relation to academic achievement and teaching performance of pre-service female teachers in Ajman. University in UAE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 560-567.
Nbina, J. B. (2012). The effect of instruction in metacognitive self-assessment strategy on chemistry selfefficacy and achievement of senior secondary school students in Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Res. Educ., 3(2),
Nzewi, U., & Ibeneme, A. N. (2011). The effect of cueing questions as instructional scaffolding on students’ achievement biology. J. Sci. Teachers Assoc. Nigeria, 46(1), 35- 44.
Narang, D., & Saini, S. (2013). Metacognition and academic performance of rural adolescents. Studies on home and community science, 7(3), 167-175.
Koçak, R., & Boyacı, M. (2010). The predictive role of students' basic ability levels and metacognitive strategies on their academic success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 767-772.
Rezvan, S., Ahmadi, S. A., & Abedi, M. R. (2006). The effects of metacognitive training on the academic achievement and happiness of Esfahan University conditional students. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19(4), 415-428.
Cubukcu, F. (2009). Learner autonomy, self-regulation, and metacognition. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 53-64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Martha Tchounwou, Ebele. C. Okoye, Faith Iseguede
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
