Washback Effects of the New CET4 Listening Test on College English Listening Teaching and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.14881Keywords:
listening subtest, the new CET-4, washback effectsAbstract
As a high-stake and criterion-related norm-referenced test which is intended to supervise the implementation of Syllabus and diagnose the strength and weakness in college English teaching and learning, CET4 (College English Test Band-4) exerts both beneficial and harmful effects on English education. Conducted respectively from the perspectives of teaching and learning attitude, materials and strategies, the study is mainly aimed to explore the possible washback effects of the new CET4 listening subtest on college English teaching and learning. A combination of both qualitative and quantitative approaches was adopted to research on 10 English teachers and 50 students from Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology. The findings reveal that the new CET-LT has made satisfactory innovations in test format and input materials, and it has more beneficial washback effects on college English teaching and learning. However, the phenomenon of “teaching and learning to test” still exists in our educational practice, which affects the efficiency of EFL teaching and learning in China.
References
Alderson, C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 115-129.
Alderson, C., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1996). TOEFL Preparation Courses: A Study of Washback. Language Testing, 13, 280-297
Andrews, S., Fullilove, J., & Wong, Y (2002). Targeting washback―a case study. System, 30, 207-223.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, K. M. (1996). Working for Washback: A Review of the Washback Concept in Language Testing. Language Testing, 66-69.
Buck, G. (1988). Testing Listening Comprehension in Japanese University Entrance Examinations. JALT Journal, 10, 15-42.
Cai Jigang (2009). The Internet-based CET-4: Significance and Washback. CAFLEC. 129, 13-18.
Cheng, Liying. (1999). Changing assessment: Washback on teacher perceptions and actions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 253-271.
Cheng, L. Y., & Curtis, A. (2004). Washback or Backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning. In L. Y. Cheng, Y. Watanabe, & A. Curtis (Eds.), Washback in language testing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, A. (2006). Washback to the learner: learner and teacher perspectives on IELTS preparation course expectations and outcomes. Assessing Writing, 11, 113-134.
Gu Xiangdong (2007). Positive or Negative: An Empirical Study of CET Washback. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press.
Hamp-Lyons, L. (1997). Washback, impact and validity: Ethical concerns. Language Testing, 14(3), 295-303.
He Congzhou (1998). English Grammar Teaching and the Washback of TEM. English Language test: Theory and Practice. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. 347
Higher Education Department of the Ministry of Education (2004). College English Curriculum Requirement (On Trial) (CECR). Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Hu Zhuanglin (2017). Diversity in the Social Semeiology. Language Teaching and Research. 1, 1-10.
Huang Dayong, & Yang Bingjun (2002). Literature Review of the Washback of Language Test. Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 4, 288-293
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jin Yan (2005). Thinking and Prospect of the CET Innovation: An Interpretation of College English Curriculum Requirement (On Trial). China University Education. 5, 4-9.
Jin Yan, & Wu Jiang (2009). The Major Principles on IB CET. Foreign Language World. 4, 61-68
Lam, H. P. (1993). Washback―can it be quantified? A study on the impact of English examinations in Hong Kong. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Leeds.
Pearson, I. (1988). Tests as levers for change. In D. Chamberlain & R. J. Baumgardner (Eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation, ELT Documents 128 (pp.98-107). England: Modern English Publications.
Prodromou, L. (1995). The Backwash Effect: from Testing to Teaching. ELT Journal, 49, 13-25
Qi Luxia (2014). Intentions or realities: An Empirical Study on The Washback of The College Entrance English Examination. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Read, J., & Hayes, B. (2003). The impact of IELTS on preparation for academic study in New Zealand. IELTS International English Language Testing System Research Reports, 4, 153-206.
Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. London: Longman Group. Ltd.
Morris, P. et al. (1996). Target-oriented curriculum Evaluation Project: Interim Report. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education.
Stephen Andrews, John Fullilove, Yama Wong. (2002). Targeting washback―a case study. System, 30, 207-223.
Yang Huizhong & Weir J.C. (1998). The Validation Research on CET4/6. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Wall, D. (2005). The impact of high-stakes examinations on classroom teaching. (pp. 36-40) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang Shouren (2009). Start A New Phase of College English Teaching Based on Experience and Innovation. Foreign Language World. 1, 5-8.
Zhang Raoxue (2008). Keep On Improving the General Teaching Level of College English Teaching, Foreign Language World. 4, 8-10.
Zhang Yanjun (2019). An Experiment on Developing Learners’ autonomy. Foreign Language World. 1, 54-61.
Zhu Yongsheng (2018). A Research on Multi-literacy and Its Influence on Educational Innovation. Foreign
Wang, C. (2023). Washback Effects of the New CET4 Listening Test on College English Listening Teaching and Learning. Advances in Social Sciences
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chao Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
