Contruction of Wawasan Nusantara as a Means of Filtering Foreign Cultures in The Border Areas of Jayapura, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.103.14179Keywords:
Wawasan Nusantara, border area, foreign culture, local intelligence, human communicationAbstract
Instead of foreign culture enriching the way of life and perspective of local people, its existence has actually weakened the position of local culture. The position of foreign culture is no longer side by side with local culture, but its "beats". Here, local existence is not higher than foreign culture. As a counter to such a massive expansion of foreign culture, Indonesia actually has a Wawasan Nusantara which is a view that every Indonesian must have it as a pride for their own nation. It also meas a way for Indonesia to see itself (geographically) as a unified whole from the aspects of ideology, politics, economy, socio-culture, security, and defense. Referring to it, this study seeks to analyze the construction of Wawasan Nusantara in the border areas to filter foreign cultural exposure, especially by using a human communication approach. During the research period, the values of Wawasan Nusantara were communicated to the border communities to further see what the community was doing. The data was then collected using a mixed method, namely quantitative and qualitative methods that reinforce each other. The results showed that the implementation of the Wawasan Nusantara had an effect in filtering foreign cultural exposure in the border area between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, namely Skouw in Jayapura. Therefore, Wawasan Nusantara can be a solution for managing the exposure to foreign cultures in general. The strategy that can be implemented is strengthening local intelligence to increase public awareness of the dangers posed by destructive foreign cultures and the importance of tightening security in Indonesia's border areas.
References
A. Himam, “Islam Nusantara di Thailand; Studi etnografi ritual ibadah Muslim di Thailand Selatan,” J. Kopis Kaji. Peneliti. dan Pemikir. Komun. penyiaran Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 77–90, 2020.
I. Ruslan, “Penguatan ketahanan budaya dalam menghadapi derasnya arus budaya asing,” J. Tapis J. Teropong Aspir. Polit. Islam, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015.
L. Agustan and Agustan, “Karakteristik data geospasial sebagai dasar perencanaan untuk memperkuat ketahanan perbatasan NKRI (Studi tentang perencanaan kota perbatasan Distrik Sota, Merauke Provinsi Papua dengan Papua Nugini),” Ketahanan Nas., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 263–279, 2017.
M. F. Ahammad and K. W. Glaister, “The double-edged effect of cultural distance on cross-border acquisition performance,” Eur. J. Int. Manag., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 327–345, 2011. 86
D. Snow, “Criminalising commercial surrogacy in Canada and Australia: the political construction of ‘national consensus,’” Aust. J. Polit. Sci., 2016, doi: 10.1080/10361146.2015.1108388.
G. Bouchard, “Pour une histoire intégrante. La construction de la mémoire dans une société diversifiée,” Rev. Hist. Am. Fr., vol. 66, no. 3–4, pp. 291–305, 2013, doi: 10.7202/1025531ar.
I. V. Stasevich, “Present-day Kyrgyzstan: Re-islamization or renascence of the national culture?,” Etnogr. Obozr., 2018, doi: 10.7868/S0869541518020069.
G. Stahl, “Relationship-building in research: Gendered identity construction in researcherparticipant interaction,” Stud. Qual. Methodol., 2016, doi: 10.1108/S1042-319220160000014020.
S. Mehrgani, “Baha’i administrative order: Towards the social construction of an integrative process,” Int. J. Relig. Spiritual. Soc., 2016, doi: 10.18848/2154-8633/CGP/v06i02/61-70.
A. Arfan and I. Athroz Arfan, “A strategy for strengthening public perception toward sharia banking,” Banks Bank Syst., 2021, doi: 10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.16.
A. M. Friedman, “Perceptual Construction: Rereading The Social Construction of Reality Through the Sociology of the Senses,” Cult. Sociol., 2016, doi: 10.1177/1749975515615149.
M. A. K. Al Hourani, “Covid-19 and the social construction of reality in Jordan taking Peter berger and thomas Luckmann to the realm of social power,” Comp. Sociol., 2021, doi: 10.1163/15691330-bja10045.
M. A. Tenis, P. P. Utami, and I. A. Brahma, “Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Wawasan Nusantara melalui Problem-Based Learning,” Semin. Nas. Pendidik. STKIP Kusuma Negara I, 2020.
G. B. Prakoso and F. U. Najicha, “Pentingnya Membangun Rasa Toleransi dan Wawasan Nusantara dalam Bermasyarakat,” J. Glob. Citiz., vol. XI, no. 1, 2022.
M. Risnain, “Rezim Provinsi Kepulauan Dalam Dalam Perspektif Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, Wawasan Nusantara, Dan Otonomi Daerah,” Unizar Law Rev., vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal.unizar.ac.id/index.php/ulr/article/view/247.
A. Anggraini and F. Najicha, “Pengembangan Wawasan Nusantara Sebagai Muatan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Generasi Muda Melalui Pemanfaatan Internet,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos., vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 174–180, 2022.
R. Aminullah and M. Umam, “Pancasila sebagai Wawasan Nusantara,” Al-Allam, vol. 1, no 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020.
Arga Ilyasa, A. Zulfa, C. N. Katiandagh, H. Amiratul, and Monica, “Wawasan Nusantara: Studi Komparatif antara Pegawai Negeri dan Pegawai Swasta di kawasan Jabodetabek,” J. Pros. Konf. Nas. Univ. Nahdlatul Ulama Indones., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 227–238, 2021.
M. Mulyati, “Wawasan Nusantara Sebagai Sarana Pembangunan Nasional Dan Pembentukan Karakter Bangsa,” Jantra., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2020, doi: 10.52829/jantra.v15i1.131.
E. Kipnis, A. J. Broderick, and C. Demangeot, “Consumer multiculturation: consequences of multi-cultural identification for brand knowledge,” Consum. Mark. Cult., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 231–253, 2014, doi: 10.1080/10253866.2013.778199.
B. K. Cheon and Y. Y. Hong, “Aversive Response Towards Culture Fusion Is Moderated by the Source of Foreign Cultural Inflow,” J. Cross. Cult. Psychol., 2020, doi: 10.1177/0022022120919994.
S. L. Muhr, “Strangers in familiar places - using generic spaces in cross-cultural identity work,” Cult. Organ.,
A. C. Tabuena, C. D. S. Bravo, F. D. R. Dimalanta, K. A. P. Jusay, and M. Y. Vitug, “Inclination state on the philippine culture and arts using the appraisal theory: Factors of progress and deterioration,” Particip. Educ. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 388–403, 2022, doi: 10.17275/per.22.21.9.1.
N. Weiner-Levy, “Defying religion or changing through Religion? shifting concepts of religion, culture, and self,” in Gender, Religion and Education in a Chaotic Postmodern World, 2013.
F. Devletabadi, “Lineage stamps in Qashqai Turks,” Turkbilig, 2018.
B. L. Valle Canales, S. L. Murillo Sandoval, I. B. Piña, I. P. Escalante, O. M. Matamoros, and R. T. Padilla, “Outline of semiotics with systemic perspective,” Comunicacion y Sociedad (Mexico). 2015, doi: 10.32870/cys.v0i24.2534.
C. Varga, “The problematic nature of human rights,” Társadalomkutatás, 2013, doi: 10.1556/tarskut.31.2013.2.1.
R. Beard et al., “Multi-modal sequence fusion via recursive attention for emotion recognition,” CoNLL 2018 -22nd Conf. Comput. Nat. Lang. Learn. Proc., no. CoNLL, pp. 251–259, 2018, doi: 10.18653/v1/k18-1025.
B. Geurts, “Communication as commitment sharing: Speech acts, implicatures, common ground,” Theor. Linguist., 2019, doi: 10.1515/tl-2019-0001.
P. Chriskos and O. Tsartsianidis, “Cochlear implants and mobile wireless connectivity,” in Digital Tools for Computer Music Production and Distribution, 2016.
T. J. Prewitt, “Why semiotics, why poetry,” Semiotica, vol. 2015, no. 207, pp. 443–450, 2015, doi: 10.1515/sem-2015-0059.
V. I. Tiupa and A. Ścibior, “On the Way to Historical Narratology,” Przestrz. Teor., 2021, doi: 10.14746/pt.2021.35.18.
A. A. Ali, “The role of social media in tasks educational for the mother in the iraqi family,” Rev. Filos., 2018.
M. Sunder, From goods to a good life: Intellectual property and global justice. 2012.
B. Gockel, H. Graf, A. Pagano, S. Pescarin, and J. Eriksson, “VMUXE an approach to user experience evaluation for virtual museums,” 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_29.
I. Jijon, “Toward a Hermeneutic Model of Cultural Globalization: Four Lessons from Translation Studies,” Sociol. Theory, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 142–161, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0735275119850862.
B. Fredericks and A. Bradfield, “Affirming Aboriginal identities: art production in central Queensland,” J. Vis. Art Pract., vol. 20, no. 1–2, pp. 31–47, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14702029.2021.1917906.
D. M. Sastre, M. N. Cansado, and A. S. Morillas, “Comunicando culturas: La creación de espacios de intercambio para favorecer la integración,” Opcion, vol. 32, no. Special Issue 13, pp. 153–172, 2016.
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupten Jayapura, Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Papua 2022. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Jayapura, 2022.
S. Lestari, Psikologi keluarga. Kencana Pranada Media Group, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ririt Yuniar, Arkan Syafera, Ade Yamin, Mashadi Said
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
