A Critical Analysis of Chieftainship Democracy in Botswana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13559Keywords:
Kgotla, Chieftainship, democracy, BotswanaAbstract
This paper seeks to provide a critical study and understanding of the concept of Chieftainship (bogosi) as it relates to the embracement of democracy in Botswana. It shows how bogosi has maintained its strategic position, administrative power and influence amongst attempts by the colonial and postcolonial states to undermine it. It maintains that bogosi has been able to adjust to changing socio-economic and political landscapes in Botswana. While the institution's powers have been slowly weakened by the government since independence. Chiefs and traditional institutions have used their legitimacy to strengthen their pliability. One can claim that chieftainship has been overtaken by events, it’s outdated, the reality is that the institution in Botswana has become central to government and cannot be cast-off. It is a traditional institution that plays a vital role in Botswana's socio-political and economic system. The blending of the traditional Kgotla system and the modern democracy gives a dichotomy of dualism of tribal- government on the one hand and a western styled central government on the other yet well connected and balanced for bringing development to Batswana. This paper is not empirically grounded, and its content is a result of desktop and content analysis of literature from articles of authors that talked about Botswana chieftainship system. The paper hopes to trigger and provoke further deliberations and empirical studies on the contribution of Kgotla political system to transformation of democracy in Botswana.
References
Government of Botswana, Chieftainship Act (Cap 41:01), The Laws of Botswana, Gaborone. Government of Botswana, Constitution of Botswana, Gaborone, Government Printer. Manatsha, B. T. (2020). Chiefs and the Politics of Land Reform in the North East District, Botswana, 2005–2008. J ournal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619868738
Molomo, M. G. (2014). Chieftainship (Bogosi) Endures Despite Democratic Consolidation in Botswana. Afrobaromet er Briefing Paper No. 130.
Mouwakwa, P. C. (2010). Master’s Thesis in Philosophy of peace and Conflict Transformation Faculty of Humanity, Social Science and Education. University of Tromsq Autumn.
PT Mgadla and AC Campbell “Dikgotla, dikgosi and the Protectorate administration” in JD Holm and P Molutsi (ed) Democracy in Botswana (1989, Botswana Society) 48.
Sanders, A. J. G. M. (1983). Chieftainship and Western Democracy in Botswana. In Journal of Contemporary Africa n Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589008308729412
Sanders, A. J. G. M. (1982). “The Southern African Legal System, its Nature and Future”. In Alternative Structures for Southern Africa Interaction, 70–77. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa. [Google Scholar]
Sanders, A. J. G. M. (1983). “Constitutionalism in Botswana: A Valiant Attempt at Judicial Activism”. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, XVI(3) November [Google Scholar]
Schapera The Tswana (1953, International African Institute) at 51–52. The Tswana recognize their common ancestry but have for centuries been divided into a number of independent tribes.
Gillet, S “The survival of chieftaincy in Botswana” (1973) 7 Botswana Notes and Records 103Google Scholar.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TAKAWIRA CHIMBINDI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
