Amendment Of Company Law: Resolving Demission State Of directors and Board of Commissioners Issue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.102.13998Keywords:
Company Law Amendment, Commissioners Issue, Demission StateAbstract
Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies ("Law No. 40/2007") has become the main regulation with regard to corporate law for 15 consecutive years. During the enactment of Law No. 40/2007, there are several unsolvable issues that requires an amendment to the company law. One of the issues relate to Directors and Board of Commissioners term of office. In practice, the term of office for the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners varies according to the articles of association of each company. Obstacles that may occur in the practice of running a company are obstacles in reappointing or replacing Directors and Commissioners whose term of office has ended. This is due to the absence of preventive arrangements in terms of the reappointment or replacement of the Directors and the Board of Commissioners whose term of office has ended due to a deadlock in holding the General Meeting of Shareholders ("GMS"). The Directors and Board of Commissioners will be in a state of demission and will no longer be able to act for and on behalf of the Company. Law No. 40/2007 has yet regulated such matters and leave the issues unsolvable. This study aims to discuss and analyze the amendment of Law No. 40/2007 to overcome the demission state of Directors and Board of Commissioners.
References
Ma Junyu, “NotaryAccordingtoCivil Law andCommon Law CloselyRelatedto International Transactions”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2020, pp. 289.
K. Wantjik Saleh, 1977, Kehakiman dan Peradilan, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, pp. 39. LinLin, “Code ofCorporateGovernance: LessonsfromSingaporeto China”, Company Lawyer, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2019, pp. 17-20.
Nguyen Van Tuan dan NguyenAnh Tuan, “CorporateGovernanceStructuresand Performance ofFirms in Asian Markets: A ComparativeAnalysisBetweenSingaporeand Vietnam”, Organizatonsand Markets in Emerging Economies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2016, pp. 118.
Ma Junyu, “NotaryAccordingtoCivil Law andCommon Law CloselyRelatedto International Transactions”, Jurnal Akta, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2020, pp. 289. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.102.13998 239 Hans vanEes, et.al, “BoardCharacteristicsandCorporate Performance in theNetherlands”, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 44.
Pearlie Koh dan HweeHoon Tan, “Directors’ Duties in Singapore: Law andPerceptions”, Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 14, 2019, pp. 50.
Glenn G. Morris, “Model Business Corporation Act as Adopted in Louisiana”, Louisiana Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2015, pp. 1022. Seealso John W. Johnson, “EffectofHold Over ProvisionsonVacansies in Office”, Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 252-255.
T.B. Benson, “Officer Holding over afterExpiration Term”, The Virginia Law Register New Series, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 415-429. Seealso American Bar Association, Model Business CorporateionActAnnotated, American Bar Association, Chicago, pp. 320. Alexander Kaarls, “Netherlands: CorporateGovernanceLawsandRegulations 2020”, accessed through https://iclg.com/practice-areas/corporate-governance-laws-and-regulations/netherlands on 20 June 2021.
Theo J. B. M. Postma, et.al, “BoardCharacteristic and Corporate Performance in theNetherlands”, Eastern EconomicJournal, 2001, pp. 4.
KBBI daring, loc.cit., “demisioner”, accessed throughhttps://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/ demisioneron 7 June 2021.
KBBI Daring, loc.cit., “mantan”, accessed throughhttps://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/mantan on 7 June 2021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Daniel Suhardiman, Nindyo Pramono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
