Assessing Performance Dimensions in Architecture, Engineer-ing and Construction Organizations

Authors

  • Constantine J. Katsanis Professor, École de technologie supérieure Université du Québec, Montréal, Québec, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13550

Keywords:

Performance, Dimensions, Organization, Architecture, Engineering, Construction and Project.

Abstract

The collaborative nature of the project environment of the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry necessitates close and prolonged collaboration of diverse organizations in order to execute a project.  For the duration of the project, a certain degree of strategic alignment amongst the participating organizations often becomes necessary for the successful execution of the project.  The impact of such strategic alignments on the organization’s own performance, is often inevitable. While the performance criteria for the project may be clearly defined along with the project’s program and specifications, the performance criteria that each participating organization has set for itself are not always as evident or articulated to others. In this paper, the results of an exploratory field research are presented.  The data analysis revealed that both shared and unique dimensions of performance apply to Architecture, Engineering and Construction organizations. The research findings are significant in that they provide a framework for assessing the degree of compatibility, in terms of shared strategic goals, for firms engaging in projects networks and alliances.

References

AIA (American Institute of Architects). (2014). The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice. American Institute of Architects. New York, NY: J. Wiley Alhosani, Yousif I., Alkass, Sabah et Katsanis, Constantine J. 2017. Operationalizing performance in publicly listed AEC firms: the dominent dimensions. In 6th CSCE-CRC International Construction Specialty Conference (Vancouver, BC, Canada, May 31-June 03, 2017) pp. 1099-1108. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.

Babbie, Earl. (2017) The Basics of Social Research, 7th Edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Chinowsky, Paul and Meredith, James (2000) Strategic Corporate Management for Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Davidson, Colin H. (1989) “Overview and Assessment of the Building Procurement Options in North America for High-Technology Companies”. In Goumain, Pierre, (ed.) High-Technology Workplaces. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 211-226.

Katsanis, C.J. (1998), An Empirical Examination of the Relationships between Strategy, Structure and Performance in Building Industry Organizations". UMI, A Bell & Howell Company, 22

Katsanis, C. J. (2022). Assessing Performance Dimensions in Architecture, Engineering and Construction Organizations. Advances in Social Sciences

Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman and Johnny Saldana (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

Mohsini, R.A. (1989) “Performance and Building: Problems and Evaluation”. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 235-242.

Mohsini, R. A., and Colin H. Davidson. (1992) “Determinants of Performance in the Traditional Building Process”. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 343-359.

Moore David R. and Andrew R. J. Dainty. (2001) Intra-Team Boundaries as Inhibitors of Performance Improvement In UK Design and Build Projects: A Call for Change Construction Management and Economics 19, 559-562

Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications

Downloads

Published

2022-12-11

How to Cite

Katsanis, C. J. (2022). Assessing Performance Dimensions in Architecture, Engineer-ing and Construction Organizations. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(12), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13550