A Brief Report Monitoring the Different Emotional States As-sociated with the First and the Fourth Dose of the An-ti-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine in an Italian Sample of Fragile Patients Aged Over 60 Years

Authors

  • Giuseppina Moccia Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Francesco De Caro Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Giulia Savarese Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Anna De Chiara Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Claudio Giordano Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Matilde Perillo Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Domenico Fornino Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Mario Capunzo Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)
  • Luna Carpinelli Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno Baronissi 84081 (Italy)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13586

Keywords:

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine , booster dose (IV), patients aged over 60 years, emotional states

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many researchers have been interested in studying attitudes and behaviors in relation to vaccination, highlighting, through data, the so-called “vaccination hesitancy” (VH) phenomenon. Our aim was to investigate emotional states associated with the fourth dose of the anti-COVID-19 vaccine in individuals from the over 60-year-old and fragile patient category and to compare them with data that were previously recorded when the first vaccine doses were administered. The online questionnaire was created ad hoc and includes different sections: socio-personal data and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) were used to detect the level of the state of anxiety, understood as a feeling of insecurity and helplessness in the face of perceived damage that can lead to worry or to flight and avoidance. The total sample consisted of 57 participants (61.4% M; mean age 67.23; SD= 6.73). Differences in emotional states in relation to vaccination emerged between Group I and Group IV in which the former were more worried and indecisive, while the latter, although nervous, felt more comfortable. Overall, trust in science appears to be a key determinant of vaccination intention. Additional strategies promoting healthy behavior are needed.

References

Troiano, G., & Nardi, A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public health, 2021, 194, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025

Limbu, Y. B., Gautam, R. K., & Pham, L. The Health Belief Model Applied to COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review. Vaccines, 2022, 10(6), 973.

Miao, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, W., Wu, J., Gu, J., Wang, M., ... & Dong, W. The Psychological Experience of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Impact on the Willingness to Receive Booster Vaccines among the Chinese Population: Evidence from a National Cross-Sectional Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022, 19(9), 5464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095464

Ben-David, B. M., Keisari, S., & Palgi, Y. Vaccine and Psychological Booster: Factors Associated With Older Adults' Com-pliance to the Booster COVID-19 Vaccine in Israel. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2022. 07334648221081982. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221081982

Madison, A. A., Shrout, M. R., Renna, M. E., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. Psychological and behavioral predictors of vaccine effi-cacy: considerations for COVID-19. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2021, 16(2), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621989243

Sprengholz, P., Henkel, L., Böhm, R., & Betsch, C. Different interventions for different vaccinations? Effects of psychological factors and health policies on COVID-19 primary and booster vaccine uptake. PsyArXiv, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xsh48https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xsh48

Barattucci, M., Pagliaro, S., Ballone, C., Teresi, M., Consoli, C., Garofalo, A., ... & Ramaci, T. Trust in science as a possible mediator between different antecedents and COVID-19 booster vaccination intention: an integration of health belief model (HBM) and theory of planned behavior (TPB). Vaccines, 2022, 10(7), 1099.

Moccia, G., Carpinelli, L., Savarese, G., Borrelli, A., Boccia, G., Motta, O., ... & De Caro, F. Perception of health, mistrust, anxiety, and indecision in a group of Italians vaccinated against COVID-19. Vaccines, 2021, 9(6), 612.

Carpinelli, L., De Caro, F., Savarese, G., Capunzo, M., Mollo, M., & Moccia, G. (2021). Emotions and Motivations Underlying Adherence to the Anti-COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign: A Survey on a Sample of Italians under 30 Years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 19(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010077

Spielberger, C.D. Manual for the State-Trait. Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form. Y); Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06496-000

Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Roma, P.; de Giglio, O.; Caggiano, G.; Tafuri, S.; da Molin, G.; Ferracuti, S.; Montagna, M.T.; Liguori, G.; et al. Knowledge and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination among Undergraduate Students from Central and Southern Italy. Vaccines, 2021, 9, 638.

Freeman, D., Loe, B. S., Yu, L. M., Freeman, J., Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., ... & Lambe, S. Effects of different types of written vaccination information on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK (OCEANS-III): a single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Public Health, 2021, 6(6), e416-e427. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00096-7

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Moccia, G., Caro, F. D., Savarese, G., Chiara, A. D., Giordano, C., Perillo, M., … Carpinelli, L. (2022). A Brief Report Monitoring the Different Emotional States As-sociated with the First and the Fourth Dose of the An-ti-SARS-Cov-2 Vaccine in an Italian Sample of Fragile Patients Aged Over 60 Years. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(12), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13586

Most read articles by the same author(s)