Consciousness and the Mind-Brain-Body-World Relationship: Towards A Transdisciplinary and Transcultural Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.101.13896Keywords:
Consciousness, Epistemology, Dualism, Materialism, Metaphilosophy, MetascienceAbstract
The aim of this paper is to overview the main epistemological implications of the scientific approach to consciousness and the mind-brain relationship, undergone a lively debate in the past decades by strict materialist monist and dualist stances. Their limits, as well as the limits of reductionism and the shortcomings of classical Western thought, suggest the need for a broader perspective. Actually, a transdisciplinary approach helps overcoming the limits and incompleteness of single axiomatic disciplines. Likewise, a transcultural, meta philosophical approach allows to understand key concepts and meanings common to different philosophies and cultures and properly face them beyond the multiplicity and ostensible oddity of forms. This approach seems to be appropriate in the study of consciousness and subjective phenomena, where the first-person perspective and the meaning of the experience are the condition sine qua non for their comprehension.
References
Jaynes J. La natura diacronica della coscienza. MIlano: Adelphi; 2014.
Jaynes J. The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1990.
Facco E, Lucangeli D, Tressoldi P. On the Science of Consciousness: Epistemological Reflections and Clinical Implications. Explor J Sci Heal 2017; 13:163–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2017.02.007.
Pockett S. Problems with theories that equate consciousness with information or information processing. Front Syst Neurosci 2014;8 (art. 22:1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00225.
Chalmers DJ. How can we construct a science of consciousness? AnnNYAcadSci 2013; 1303:25–35.
Chalmers DJ. The conscious mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1996.
Berganza CE, Mezzich JE, Pouncey C. Concepts of disease: their relevance for psychiatric diagnosis and classification. Psychopathology 2005; 38:166–70.
Wakefield JC. Misdiagnosing normality: Psychiatry’s failure to address the problem of false positive diagnoses of mental disorder in a changing professional environment. J MentHealth 2010; 19:337–51.
Frances A. The new crisis in psychiatry. Ann Intern Med 2013. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00655.
Facco E, Fracas F, Tressoldi P. Moving beyond the concept of altered state of consciousness: the Non-Ordinary Mental Expressions (NOMEs). Adv Soc Sci Res J 2021; 8:615–31. https://doi.org/10.14738/ASSRJ.83.9935.
James W. The Varieties of Religious Experience. A Study in Human Nature. Kindle Edi. New York, NY, USA: Longmans, Green, & Co; 1917.
Facco E, Al Khafaji BE, Tressoldi P. In search of the true self. J Theor Philos Psychol 2019; 39:157–80.
Tye M. Qualia. In: Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encycl. Philos., Stanford, CA, USA: 2018, p. 1–39.
Sturm T. Consciousness regained? Philosophical arguments for and against reductive physicalism. DialoguesClinNeurosci 2012; 14:55–63.
Jackson F. Epiphenomenal Qualia. Philos Q 1982; 32:127–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960077.
Kirk R. Zombies. In: Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encycl. Philos., Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy; 2019, p. 1–32.
Solms M, Panksepp J. The “Id” Knows More than the “Ego” Admits: Neuropsychoanalytic and Primal Consciousness Perspectives on the Interface Between Affective and Cognitive Neuroscience. Brain Sci 2012; 2:147–75. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci2020147.
Facco E. Pain, the uknown: epistemological issues and related clinical implications. Minerva Anestesiol 2021. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15920-6.
Levine J. Materialism and Qualia: The Explanatory Gap. Pacific Philos Q 1983; 64:354–61.
Marras A. Consciousness and reduction. Br J Philos Sci 2005; 56:335–61.
Morris K. Does Functional Reduction Need Bridge Laws? A Response to Marras. Br J Philos Sci 2009; 60:647–57.
IASP. Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Recommended by the IASP Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain 1979; 6:249–52.
Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, Finnerup NB, Flor H, Gibson S, et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020; 161:1976–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939.
Facco E, Bacci C, Zanette G. Hypnosis as sole anesthesia for oral surgery: The egg of Columbus. J Am Dent Assoc 2021; 152:756–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADAJ.2021.04.017. 428
Thompson T, Terhune DB, Oram C, Sharangparni J, Rouf R, Solmi M, et al. The effectiveness of hypnosis for pain relief: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 controlled experimental trials. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 99:298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.013.
Casiglia E, Finatti F, Tikhonoff V, Stabile MR, Mitolo M, Albertini F, et al. Mechanisms of hypnotic analgesia explained by functional magnetic resonance (fMRI). Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2020; 68:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2020.1685331.
Fumerton R. Speckled Hens and Objects of Acquaintance. Philos Perspect 2005; 19:121–38.
Le Breton D. Esperienze del dolore. Tra distruzione e rinascita. Torino: Raffaello Cortina Editore; 2010.
Le Breton D. Antropologia del dolore. Sesto San Giovanni, MI: Meltemi; 2007.
Feinberg TE, Mallatt JM. Subjectivity “demystified”: Neurobiology, evolution, and the explanatory gap. Front Psychol 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01686.
Irvine E. Old Problems with New Measures in the Science of Consciousness. Br J Philos Sci 2012; 63:627–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs019.
Irvine E. Consciousness as a Scientific Concept: A Philosophy of Science Perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.: Springer; 2012.
Burtt EA. The Metaphysical Foundation of Modern Science. Mineaola, NY, US: Dover Publications; 2003.
Facco E. A neurophenomenological theory of the three worlds. Theory Psychol 2022; 32:733–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211068426.
Facco E, Tagliagambe S. Learning from the past: from incubation in ancient Egypt and Greece to modern hypnosis. Adv Soc Sci Res J 2021; 8:268–85. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.87.10541.
Kuziemsky C. Decision-making in healthcare as a complex adaptive system. Healthc Manag Forum 2016;29:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470415614842.
Ma’ayan A. Complex systems biology. J R Soc Interface 2017; 14:20170391. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0391.
Schirber M. Nobel Prize: Complexity, from Atoms to Atmospheres. Physics (College Park Md) 2021; 14:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSICS.14.141.
Parisi G. Order parameter for spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett 1983; 50:1946–8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.50.1946.
Parisi G. Infinite number of order parameters for spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett 1979; 43:1754–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.43.1754.
Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, et al. Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour. Anim Behav 2008; 76:201–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.02.004.
Parisi G. Complexity in Biology: The Point of View of a Physicist. ArXiv:Cond-Mat/ 1994;9412018v1:1–5.
Facco E, Agrillo C, Greyson B. Epistemological implications of near-death experiences and other nonordinary mental expressions: Moving beyond the concept of altered state of consciousness. Med Hypotheses 2015; 85:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2015.04.004.
Damasio A. Descartes’ error. New York: G.P. Putnam; 1994.
Ryle G. The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson; 1949.
Severino E. The Essence of Nihilism. Brooklin, NY, USA: Verso; 2016.
Galilei G. Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienze. UK: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015; 1638.
Florenskij P. The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy in Twelve Letters. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press; 2004.
La Mettrie OJ. Machine Man and Other Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996; 1747.
Facco E, Tagliagambe S. Ritornare a Ippocrate. Riflessioni sulla medicina di oggi. Milano, Italy: Mondadori Università; 2020.
Facco E, Casiglia E, Zanette G, Testoni I. On the way of liberation from suffering and pain: role of hypnosis in palliative care. Ann Palliat Med 2017:1–12.
Gould SJ. Nonoverlapping magisteria. Nat Hist 1997; 16:16–22.
Alberts B. Preface. Sci. Creat. A view from Natl. Acad. Sci. 2nd ed., Washington, USA: National Academic Press; 1999, p. viii–ix.
Wulff M. D. Mystical Experiences. In: Cardena E, Lynn J. S, Krippner S, editors. Var. anomalous Exp. Examining Sci. evidence, Washington, USA: American Psychological Association.; 2014.
Greyson B. Congruence Between Near-Death and Mystical Experience. Int J Psychol Relig 2014; 24:298–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2013.845005.
Lifshitz M, van Elk M, Luhrmann TM. Absorption and spiritual experience: A review of evidence and potential mechanisms. Conscious Cogn 2019;73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONCOG.2019.05.008.
Forman RCK. What does mysticism have to teach us about consciousness? JConsciousness Stud 1998; 5:185–201.
Derbyshire SW, Whalley MG, Stenger VA, Oakley DA. Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. Neuroimage 2004; 23:392–401. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.033.
Rainville P, Hofbauer RK, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH, Price DD. Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. JCogn Neurosci 2002; 14:887–901.
Russell B. Problems of Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1912.
van Riel R, Van Gulick R. Scientific Reduction. Stanford Encycl. Philos., Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford Encyclopedia of philosophy; 2019, p. 1–78.
Popper KR. Objective Knoweldge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1972.
Nagel E. The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Explanation. New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World; 1961.
Charles A. The pathophysiology of migraine: implications for clinical management. Lancet Neurol 2018; 17:174–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30435-0. 430
Flynn N. Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Hypnosis for the Management of Headache. Int J Clin Exp Hypn 2018; 66:343–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207144.2018.1494432.
Linde K, Allais G, Brinkhaus B, Manheimer E, Vickers A, White AR. Acupuncture for migraine prophylaxis. In: Linde K, editor. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001218.pub2.
Forbes RB, McCarron M, Cardwell CR. Efficacy and Contextual (Placebo) Effects of CGRP Antibodies for Migraine: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Headache 2020; 60:1542–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13907.
Bedau MA. Weak Emergence. In: Tomberlin J, editor. Philos. Perspect. Mind, Causation, World., Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc; 1997, p. 375–99.
Cohen AA. Complex systems dynamics in aging: new evidence, continuing questions. Biogerontology 2016; 17:205–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9584-x.
Eeles E, Teodorczuk A, Mitleton-Kelly E. Reconceptualizing delirium as a disorder of complex system failure. Med Hypotheses 2018; 118:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2018.06.031.
Howsepian AA. Reductionism Revised: Return of the Biomedical Model. In: Leigh H, editor. Biopsychosoc. Approaches Prim. Care State Art Challenges 21st Century., New York, NY, USA: Springer Science + Business Media; 1997, p. 179–200.
Merli PG, Missiroli GF, Pozzi G. Electron interferometry with the Elmiskop 101 electron microscope. J Phys E 1974; 7:729–32. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3735/7/9/016.
Facco E, Fracas F. De Rerum (Incerta) Natura: A Tentative Approach to the Concept of “Quantumlike” Symmetry (Basel) 2022;14:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14030480.
Penrose R. The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2016.
Poznanski RR, Tuszynski JA, Feinberg TE. Biophysics of Consciousness. London, UK: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd; 2017.
Beck F, Eccles JC. Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proc Natl Academy Sci USA 1992; 89:11357–61. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.23.11357.
Lambert N, Chen YN, Cheng YC, Li CM, Chen GY, Nori F. Quantum biology. Nat Phys 2013; 9:18.
Bordonaro M, Ogryzko V. Quantum biology at the cellular level--elements of the research program. Biosystems 2013; 112:11–30.
Melkikh A V, Khrennikov A. Nontrivial quantum and quantum-like effects in biosystems: Unsolved questions and paradoxes. ProgBiophysMolBiol 2015; 119:137–61.
Gould JL. Animal Navigation: Birds Have Magnetic Maps. CurrBiol 2015;25: R836–8.
Heyers D, Elbers D, Bulte M, Bairlein F, Mouritsen H. The magnetic map sense and its use in fine-tuning the migration programme of birds. J Comp Physiol A NeuroetholSensNeural Behav Physiol 2017.
Yang J, Dettori R, Nunes JPF, List NH, Biasin E, Centurion M, et al. Direct observation of ultrafast hydrogen bond strengthening in liquid water. Nat 2021 5967873 2021; 596:531–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03793-9.
Wang Z, Solloway T, Shiffrin RM, Busemeyer JR. Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. ProcNatlAcadSciUSA 2014; 111:9431–6.
Atmanspacher H. At home in the quantum world. Behav Brain Sci 2013; 36:276–7.
Barlow PW. The natural history of consciousness, and the question of whether plants are conscious, in relation to the Hameroff-Penrose quantum-physical “Orch OR” theory of universal consciousness. CommunIntegrBiol 2015;8: e1041696.
Neppe VM, Close ER. The concept of relative non-locality: theoretical implications in consciousness research. Explore (NY) 2015; 11:102–8.
Walach H, Romer H. Generalized entanglement - A nonreductive option for a phenomenologically dualist and ontologically monist view of consciousness. In: Walach H, Schmidt S, Wayne BJ, editors. Neurosci. Conscious. Spirituality., Dordrecht: Springer; 2011, p. 81–96.
Henry RC. The mental Universe. Nature 2005; 436:29.
D’Ariano MG, Faggin F. Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach. In: Scardigli F, editor. Artif. Intell. Nat. Conscious., New York, NY, USA: Srpinger; 2022, p. in press. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2012.06580.
Appleby DM. Mind and Matter. Cornell Univeristy Libr - Hystory Philos Phys 2013:1–26.
Facco E. Hypnosis and resilience: a metaphilosophic perspective. Int J Psyco-Anthropology 2021; 1:1–19.
Hawking S, Mlodinow L. The Grand Design. New York, NY, USA: Bantam Books; 2010.
Popper KR, Eccles JC. The Self and His Brain. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1977.
Nagel T. Philosophical Review What Is It Like to Be a Bat? Source Philos Rev 1974; 83:435–50.
Facco E, Tagliagambe S. The Century-Old Swinging of Russia Between Order and Dissolution, East and West: A Historical and Psychocultural Insight in the Russian-Ukrainian War. Adv Soc Sci Res J 2022; 9:447–60. https://doi.org/10.14738/ASSRJ.911.13497.
Jullien F. Il n’y a pas d’Identité Culturelle mai Nous Défendons les Resources d’une Culture. Paris, France: Éditions de L’Herne; 2016.
Lazerowitz M. A note on metaphylosophy. Metaphilosophy 1970; 1:91.
Overgaard S, Gilbert P, Burwood S. Introduction: what good is metaphilosophy? An Introd. to Metaphilosophy., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2013, p. 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018043.
Burik S. Opening philosophy to the world: derrida and education in philosophy. Educ Theory 2009; 59:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00320.x.
Weber R. “How to Compare?” – On the Methodological State of Comparative Philosophy. Philos Compass 2013; 8:593–603.
Jullien F. De l’Etre au Vivre. Lexique eurochinoise de la pensée. Paris, France: Gallimard; 2015.
Raatikainen P. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems. In: Zalta EN, editor. Stanford Encycl. Philos., Stanford, CA, USA: University of Stanford, CA, US; 2018, p. 1–68. 432
Buechner J. Are the Godel incompleteness theorems limitative results for the neurosciences? J BiolPhys 2010; 36:23–44.
Carter B. Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology. In: Longair MS, editor. Confront. Cosmol. Theor. with Obs. Data., Dordrecht, The Netherlands.: Reidel; 1974, p. 291–8.
Carter B. Republication of: large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology. Gen Relativ Gravit 2011; 43:3225–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1258-7.
Rebaglia A. Critica della ragione metascientifica. Milano: Franco Angeli; 1996.
Barrow JD, Tipler FJ. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1988.
Heidegger M. Being and Time. New York, NY, USA: Harper Perennil Modern Classics; 2008.
Descartes R. Discours de la méthode. Paris, France: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, Éd. Gallimard, 1966; 1637.
Husserl E. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanstone: Northwestern University Press; 1970.
Morin E. La sfida della complessità. La défi de la complexité. Milano, Italy: GaiaMente, Le lettere; 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Enrico Facco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
