Effectiveness of Self-Evaluation, Peer Evaluation and 2nd-Step Self-Evaluation- Covering Anchoring Training in Maritime Education and Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.912.13718Keywords:
Self-Evaluation; Mutual Evaluation; 2nd-step self-evaluation; SCAT (Steps for Coding and Theorization); Anchoring Training.Abstract
Evaluation is an essential part of education and training, and it can be used in maritime education and training to help learners organize their knowledge and improve their skills, as well as to improve education and training methods. In this study, self-evaluation and mutual evaluation were conducted during anchoring training on the training ship Shioji Maru belonging to the Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology. In a survey of students trained in 2020 and 2021 regarding the acquisition of knowledge and skills, 94.5% of students rated themselves as “very effective” or “effective” in their self-evaluation and 92.0% of students rated themselves as “very effective” or “effective” in their mutual evaluation. Comparing the self-evaluation scores with the mutual evaluation scores, it was found that the mutual evaluation scores tended to rank higher than the self-evaluation scores. This is thought to be due to a lack of confidence in one’s own ship handling skills, which leads to harsh evaluations of oneself and more lenient evaluations of others. It was also found that the higher the instructor’s evaluation score, the smaller the difference between the self-evaluation score and the instructor’s evaluation score. Students with higher scores in the instructor’s evaluation were more confident in their ship handling skills, which is thought to indicate that they can evaluate themselves more accurately. On the other hand, self-evaluation was conducted at an early stage immediately after the training, and the bridge operation team and the entire team also conducted the self-evaluation again after the debriefing. In other words, a 2nd-step self-evaluation was conducted through two evaluations conducted at different times. We show the results of a qualitative analysis of the students’ impressions and opinions of these self-evaluations and peer evaluation using the steps for coding and theorization (SCAT) method.
References
Taner Albayrak., et al., (2012): Encouraging Research in Maritime Education & Training, Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, Volume 1 (1), 4–9.
Japan Coast Guard (2021): Current Status and Countermeasures for Marine Accidents in 2020.
Kashima, H., Kunieda, Y. and Takemoto, T. (2001): About the Training Effect of Ship Handling Training, Journal of the National Institute for Sea Training, 2001, 1, Vol. 1, 17-38.
Kunieda, Y., Murai, K. and Kashima, H. (2018): Kunieda Yoshiaki et al., Study on Education of Seamanship in the Anchoring Training, the 16th World Congress of the International Association of Institutes of Navigation
Kunieda, Y., Kashima, H., Murai, K. and Niwa, S. (2020): The Influential Features of an Effective Model of Anchoring Training in Maritime Education, Psychology Research, March 2020, Vol. 10(3), 106-117.
Mochizuki, M. (2013): On Peer Learning and Learning Process in JSL Learners, Kansai University, Bulletin of Faculty of Foreign Language Studies, 8, 87-97.
Mizogami, S. (2014): Conversion of Active Learning and a Lesson Study Paradigm, Toshindo.
Tanaka Hiroyuki (2017): Evaluation of Learning Achievements for Active Learning, Gakuyo Shobo, 74-83.
Otani T. (2011): SCAT: Steps for Coding and Theorization - Qualitative Data Analysis Methods that are Easy to Initiate with Explicit Procedures and Applicable to Small Data Sets-, Kansei Engineering International Journal, Vol.10(3), 155-160.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yoshiaki Kunieda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
