Investigating Omani EFL Students’ Learning Styles at the Foundation Program in UTAS-Salalah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.911.13507Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the most preferred learning styles by Omani EFL students’ and to find out the relationship between the students’ learning style and their gender. 100 students were selected randomly from the four levels in the foundation program at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences. There were 56 females and 44 males. The participants answered the Grasha-Riechmann student learning styles scale. The findings indicated that the dependent learning style was the most preferred learning styles by Omani EFL students. Also, the female students obtained significantly higher mean in collaborative than male students, but in the rest of the learning styles, students were almost the same. The avoidant learning styles was the least favorite learning style by both female and male students. Based on the results, Omani EFL students are more dependent on their teacher and classroom. Moreover, female students tend to collaborate with other students and participate in their different activities and there is no huge difference between female and male students in the other learning styles. The results of this study can help teachers to become more sensitive to the diverse learning styles and it can serve as a guideline to design course content that is more compatible with the students’ styles.
References
Baneshi, A. R., Dehghan Tezerjani, M., Mokhtarpour, H. (2014). Grasha-Richmann college students’ learning styles of classroom participation: role of gender and major. J Adv Med Educ Prof. Vol 2(3), pp. 103–107.
Cassidy, S. & Eachus, P. (2000) Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education, Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307–322.
Cassidy, S. 2004 Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures, Educational Psychology,24(4), 419-444
Claxton, D. S., & Ralston, Y. (1978). Learning styles: The impact on teaching and administration (Research Report No. 10). Washington DC: American Association of Higher Education.
Corbin, A. (2017). Assessing differences in learning styles: Age, gender and academic performance at the tertiary level in the Caribbean. Caribbean Teaching Scholar. Vol. 7, pp. 67–91.
Curry L. (1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive or learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Canadian College of Health Service Executives.
Gregorc, A. F (1982b). Greagacn Style Delineator. Maynard: MIA: Gahriel Systems.
Kolb, D. (1976). Learning styles inventory. Boston: McBer and Co.
Malsawmkimi, M. & Fanai, L. (2019). A Study of Perceptual Learning Styles with Academic Achievement in Private Higher Secondary Schools in Aizawl City. Educational Quest: An Int. J. of Education and Applied Social Science: Vol. 10(1), pp. 21-25.
Panambur, S., Nambiar, V., Heming, T. (2014).Learning Style Preferences of Preclinical Medical Students in Oman. Oman Medical Journal. Vol 29(6), pp. 461-3.
Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorization of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17, 5–27. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.911.13507 521
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles -- an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3-4), 193-215
Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The journal of Psychology, 87(2), 213-223.
Rollins, M. (2015). Learning Style Diagnostics: The Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Styles Scale. Retrieved from https://elearningindustry.com/learning-style-diagnostics-grasha-riechmann-student-learning-styles-scale
Tait, H & Entwistle, N J (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, vol. 31, pp. 99-118.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muna Kashoob, Antony Jawahar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
