Item Analysis, Reliability Estimates, Percentile Ranks and Stanine Scores Among University Students in Ghana

Authors

  • Abraham Yeboah Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Kumasi, Ghana ORCID: 0000-0001-9310-4367
  • Abraham Gyamfi Department of Education Wesley College of Education, Kumasi, Ghana
  • Dominic Kaku Wintson Renmin University of China
  • Akosua Dwomoh Prempeh Department of Cognitive Science Technische Universitat, Kaiserslautern, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.12757

Keywords:

discrimination, difficulty, reliability, examinees.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to perform item analysis on a forty (40) multiple choice test items among students of the University of Cape Coast in Ghana. The study further sought to estimate the reliability of the results and compute the percentile ranks and stanine scores.  The results showed that, regarding the two statistics; difficulty (P) and discrimination (D) indices, it was observed that twelve (12) items functioned properly. Five items, although were easy, discriminated well. Nine (9) items were either easy or difficult and had low discrimination indices. It was found that nine (9) items had acceptable difficulty level but did not discriminate well. The results revealed that two (2) items had negative discrimination indices and two items were too easy and did not discriminate. The estimate of reliability; Spearman Brown prophecy (rxy) and Cronbach alpha (α) were found to be 0.63 and 0.78 respectively. It was found that examinees with scores of 33 had 99% of the norm group performing below them whiles examinees with scores of 26 had 70% of the norm group falling below them. Examinees with scores of 32 and 33 were found to be in stanine nine, those with scores of 23 to 24 were in stanine five whilst examinees with scores of 4 to 16 were in stanine one. Test results are essential for the determination of learner’s future endeavours. It is recommended that test item developers (teachers) in schools, colleges and universities adhere to principles of test construction, administration and interpretation so as to enhance dependability of learners’ test results.

References

Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Montery, California.

Amedehe, F. K. (2015). Reliability . Oral conversation at Lectures. Cape Coast: Unpublished.

Bar-Hillel, M., Budescu, D., & Attali, Y. (2005). Scoring and keying multiple-choice test: a case study in irrationality. Mind & Society, 4, 3–12.

Betts, L. R., Elder, T. J., Hartley, J., & Trueman, M. (2009). Does correction for guessing reduce students’ performance on multiple-choice examinations? Yes? No? Sometimes? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 1–15.

Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krahwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Etsey, Y. K. A. (2012). Assessment in education. Cape Coast: Unpublished

Gyimah, A., & Amedehe, F (2003). Introduction to measurement and evaluation. Cape Coast: Unpublished

Gyimah, A., &Amedehe, F (2003). Introduction to measurement and evaluation. Cape Coast: Unpublished

Kubinger, K. D., Holocher-Ertl, S., Reif, M., Hohensinn, C., & Frebort, M. (2010). On minimizing guessing effects on multiple-choice items: Superiority of two solutions and three distractors item format to a one solution and five distractors item format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 111–115.

Nitko, A. J. (1996). Educational assessment of students (2nd Ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall/Merrill Education.

Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational Tests and Measurements (3rded.). USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc 59

Oduro-Okyireh, G. (2008). Testing practices of senior secondary school teachers in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Pido, S. (2012). Comparison of item analysis results obtained using item response theory approaches. Journal of Educational Assessment in Africa 7 192-207.

Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2001). Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Tamakloe, E. K., & Amedahe, F. K. (1996). Principles and Methods of Teaching. Black Mask. Cantoment. Accra.

Tyler, R. H. (199l). Formal assessment in the classroom: The Ghana Education Service termly assessment plan. Paper presented to the Quality Improvement in Primary Schools (QUIPS) Project. Funded by the USAID.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-10

How to Cite

Yeboah, A., Gyamfi, A., Wintson, D. K., & Prempeh, A. D. (2022). Item Analysis, Reliability Estimates, Percentile Ranks and Stanine Scores Among University Students in Ghana. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(8), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.12757