Negotiated Management as a Tool to Achieve Social Control over Political Protest and Social Movement Organizations

Authors

  • Tamara J. Lynn Associate Professor Department of Criminal Justice Fort Hays State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.99.13091

Keywords:

social control, negotiated management, escalated force policing, political protest

Abstract

Social movement scholars describe negotiated management as a process of collaboration between those in power and those in resistance.  For this research, content analysis and critical discourse analysis are used to evaluate questionnaire responses from law enforcement agencies in communities where competing grassroots political organizations engaged in political protest.  Findings indicate that law enforcement exercise different levels of social control toward those least likely to engage in, or submit to, a negotiated management model of policing. I argue that responses toward organizations, as reported in questionnaire responses, demonstrates a structural permanence of social control.  Negotiated management between the state and competing grassroots political organizations is a tool used to achieve informal control.  Organizations that fail – or choose not – to engage in informal social control of their members risk escalated force by police agencies that seek compliance.  Results of this research increase understanding of law enforcement responses to political protest groups.

References

Boreus, K., & Bergstrom, G. (2017). Analyzing text and discourse: Eight approaches for the social sciences. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Chenoweth, E., Perkoski, E., & Kang, S. (2017). State repression and nonviolent resistance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9), 1950-1969. della Porta, D. (1996). Social movements and the state: Thoughts on the policing of protest. In: McAdam D, McCarthy JD & Zald MN (eds). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, (pp. 62—92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. della Porta, D. & Fillieule, O. (2004). Policing social protest. In: Snow, D.A., Soule, S.A. & Kriesi, H. (eds). The Blackwell companion to social movements, (pp, 217—241). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. della Porta, D., Peterson, A., & Reiter, H. (eds). (2006). The policing of transnational protest. London: Ashgate Publishing.

Drury, J. & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues 65(4), 707—725. 204

Lynn, T. J. (2022). Negotiated Management as a Tool to Achieve Social Control over Political Protest and Social Movement Organizations. Advances

Earl, J., Soule, S.A., & McCarthy, J.D. (2003). Protest under fire? Explaining the policing of protest. American Sociological Review 68(4), 581—606.

Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Gillham, P. F., & Marx, G. T. (2018). Changes in the policing of civil disorders since the Kerner Report: The police response to Ferguson, August 2014, and some implications for the twenty-first century. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 4(6), 122-143.

Gillham, P.F. & Noakes, J.A. (2007). More than a march in a circle: Transgressive protests and the limits of negotiated management. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 12(4), 341—357.

Gillham, P.F., Edwards, B., & Noakes, J. (2013). Strategic incapacitation and the policing of Occupy Wall Street protests in New York City, 2011. Policing and Society 23(1), 81— 102.

Glasberg, D.S. & Shannon, D. (2011). Political sociology: Oppression, resistance, and the state. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Johnston, H. (2011). States and social movements. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kienscherf, M. (2016). Beyond militarization and repression: Liberal social control as pacification. Critical Sociology, 42(7-8), 1179—1194.

King, M. (2013). Disruption is not permitted: The policing and social control of Occupy Oakland. Critical Criminology 21: 463—475. DOI: 10.1007/s10612-013-9198-z.

Lynn, T. J. (2014) Irony of a revolution: How grassroots organizations reinforced power structures they fought to resist (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (UMI No. 1559135561).

Lynn, T.J. & Williams, L. S. (2018). ‘Have a quiet, orderly, polite revolution’: Framing political protest and protecting the status quo. Critical Sociology, 44(4-5), 733—751.

Maguire, E.R., Barak, M., Cross, K. & Lugo, K. (2016). Attitudes among Occupy DC participants about the use of violence against police. Policing and Society DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2016.1202247.

McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In: McAdam, D, McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, pp. 23—40. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D. & Snow, D.A. (2010). Readings on social movements: Origins, dynamics and outcomes, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

McCombs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2), 176—187.

Meyers-Montgomery, J. (2016). Militarized police and unpermitted protest: Implementing policy that civilizes the police. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 16(3), 278-286.

Peterson, A. & Wahlstrom, M. (2015). Repression: The governance of domestic dissent. In della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements, (pp. 634-652). Oxford University Press.

Piven, F.F. (2006). Challenging authority: How ordinary people change America. Lanham, MY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Rafail, P., Soule, S.A. & McCarthy, J.D. (2012). Describing and accounting for the trends in US protest policing, 1960 – 1995. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56(4), 736—765.

Ritter, E.H. (2014). Policy disputes, political survival, and the onset and severity of state repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58(1), 143—168. 205

Soule, S.A. & Davenport, C. (2009). Velvet glove, iron first, or even hand? Protest policing in the United States, 1960—1990. Mobilization 14(1), 1—22.

Smith, W. (2012). Policing civil disobedience. Political Studies 60(4), 826—842.

Staggenborg, S. (2011). Social movements. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Young, R. (2015). Dissent: The history of an American idea. New York, NY: New York University Press.

Whelan, C., & Molnar, A. (2018). Securing mega-events: Networks, strategies and tensions. London: Springer Nature Limited.

Williamson, V., Trump, K-S., & Einstein, K. L. (2018). Black Lives Matter: Evidence that police-caused deaths predict protest activity. American Political Science Association, doi: 10.1017/S1537592717004273.

Wilson, J. (1973). Introduction to Social Movements. New York, NY: Basic Books. i The larger research project for which data was collected provided a comprehensive analysis related to the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street; however, the responses to the information request used in this study referenced all forms of public assembly, whether by non-governmental organizations, social movement organizations, or other groups.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-17

How to Cite

Lynn, T. J. (2022). Negotiated Management as a Tool to Achieve Social Control over Political Protest and Social Movement Organizations. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(9), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.99.13091