Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Face-to-Face Instruction: Students’ Perception of their Effectiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Policy Paper

Authors

  • Jarrett Landor-Ngemi Southern University A & M College Baton Rouge PO Box 9656, LA 70813

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.13006

Keywords:

Synchronous Instruction, Asynchronous Instruction, Face-to-Face Instruction, COVID-19, Students’ Perception

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the abrupt transition from the traditional face-to-face instruction to distance learning. Although Web-based and computer-mediated learning continues to be scrutinized because of the long-believed perception that it is inferior to face-to-face instruction, the wake of the current COVID-19 pandemic has led University leaders to make online learning mandatory. Despite the rapid growth of Web-based/online instruction in higher education, many faculties do not see the potential of Web-based instruction in improving student learning and achievement This paper seeks to investigate students’ perception of synchronous, asynchronous, and face-to-face instruction during the distance-learning phase of education and the implications for public policy. the study employed a quantitative research design. The participants for this study were graduate and undergraduate student groups enrolled in public four-year institutions of higher learning. assess student perceptions of effective learning environments across the dimensions of synchronous online instruction with SOIV, asynchronous online instruction, and face-to-face instruction. The rationale behind this research was based on an assessment of the elements of quality instruction found throughout the dimensions of SOIV, asynchronous online instruction, and face-to-face instruction. The results show that students would prefer asynchronous online learning environments rather than SOIV.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., and Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended elearning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Austral. J. Educ. Technol. 33, 1–23. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.2741

Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). E-learning, resilience, and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster. E Learn. Digit. Med. 14, 259–274. DOI: 10.1177/2042753017751712

Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: technologies, tools, and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Benke, M., Bishop, T., Thompson, M., Scarafiotti, C, & SchWeber, C. (2004).

Bollinger, D., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. InternationalJournal on E-Learning (online) 3(1).

Cheng, G., and Chau, J. (2016). Exploring the relationships between learning styles, online participation, learning achievement and course satisfaction: An empirical study of a blended learning course. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47, 257–278. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12243

Cooke, G. (2020). Online Learning vs Face to Face Learning | Elucidat. Available online at: https://www.elucidat.com/blog/online-learning-vs-face-to-face-learning/ (accessed January 17, 2021).

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: a panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 49, 5–22. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520934018

EasyLMS (2021). Difference Synchronous vs Asynchronous Learning | Easy LMS. Available online at: https://www.easy-lms.com/knowledge-center/lms-knowledge-center/synchronous-vs-asynchronouslearning/item10387 (accessed January 9, 2021).

Gautam, P. (2020). Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Learning - eLearning Industry. Available online at: https://elearningindustry.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-online-learning (accessed December 1, 2020).

Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2004). Critical factors in student satisfaction and success: Facilitating student role adjustment in communities of inquiry. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Education: Into the Mainstream, 5, 29 online -28. Needham, MA: Sloan-C Consortium.

Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education^ 5(1-2), 41-61.

Isaeva, R., Eisenschmidt, E., Vanari, K., and Kumpas-Lenk, K. (2020). Students’ views on dialogue: improving student engagement in the quality assurance process. Qual. High. Educ. 26, 80–97. DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2020.1729307

Li, C., and Lalani, F. (2020). The Rise of Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic | World Economic Forum. Available online at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-globalcovid19-online-digital-learning/ (accessed December 1, 2020). 595

Nikdel Teymori, A., and Fardin, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and educational challenges: a review of the benefits of online education. Ann. Milit. Health Sci. Res. 18:e105778. doi: 10.5812/amh.105778

Moore, M.G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance Education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Rosell, C. (2020). COVID-19 Virus: Changes in Education | CAE. Available online at: https://www.cae.net/covid-19-virus-changes-in-education/ (accessed January 9, 2021).

Rovai, A. P. (2002). Sense of community perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 319-332.

Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., and Lodhi, R. N. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Qual. Quant. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z [Epub ahead of print].

Strielkowski, W. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and the digital revolution in academia and higher education. Preprints 2020:2020040290. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202004. 0290.v1

Whiteman, J. A. M. (2002). The adult learner in the computer-mediated environment. Retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.enc.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdos2/content_storage_01/000 0000b/80/27/a9/f4.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-09-03

How to Cite

Landor-Ngemi, J. . (2022). Synchronous, Asynchronous, and Face-to-Face Instruction: Students’ Perception of their Effectiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Policy Paper. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(8), 591–596. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.98.13006