Evaluation of the Level of Smart City Construction Based on Guangfo-Shenzhen-Dongguan in the Context of Guangdong-Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.95.12439Keywords:
Guangdong Hong Kong -Macao Greater Bay Area, Smart Water, Smart Culture and Tourism, Smart Transportation, Smart Healthcare, Smart City Construction Level EvaluationAbstract
The Guangdong Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area is one of the most open and economically dynamic regions in China. The construction of a new type of smart bay area is an important part of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area strategy, and the construction of a smart bay area needs to be closely integrated with international standards and focus on building a smart digital centre in the Greater Bay Area. This study focuses on the development needs, future development trends and construction strategies of smart cities in four city clusters in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area from four development perspectives: smart water conservancy, smart cultural tourism, smart transportation and smart healthcare, using data related to the development of smart cities in Guangzhou-Foshan-Shenzhen-Dongguan in recent years, the entropy weighting method is used to determine the weights of 40 indicators, and the TOPSIS evaluation model is applied to evaluate the level of smart city construction in each city. The evaluation of the level of smart city construction in each city was carried out by using the TOPSIS evaluation model, and it was concluded that there were large differences among the cities, and there was a need for city-specific policies and reasonable improvements. The evaluation of the level of smart city development in each city was carried out using the TOPSIS evaluation model.
References
Zhu Huiying,Shen Liyin,Ren Yitian. How can smart city shape a happier life? The mechanism for developing a Happiness Driven Smart City[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society,2022,80.
Kim JungHoon. Smart city trends: A focus on 5 countries and 15 companies[J]. Cities,2022,123.
Eom JinKi,Lee KwangSub,Ko Sangpil,Lee Jun. Exploring Travel Mode Preference of External Trips for Smart City Transportation Planning: Sejong, Korea[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(2).
Wang Jinxiu,Deng Kun. Impact and mechanism analysis of smart city policy on urban innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy,2021(prepublish).
Huang Kaihui,Luo Weijie,Zhang Weiwei,Li Jinhai. Characteristics and Problems of Smart City Development in China[J]. Smart Cities,2021,4(4).
Yigitcanlar Tan,Degirmenci Kenan,Butler Luke,Desouza Kevin C.. What are the key factors affecting smart city transformation readiness? Evidence from Australian cities[J]. Cities,2022,120.
[7]Zhao Fang,Fashola Olushola I.,Olarewaju Tolulope I.,Onwumere Ijeoma. Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review[J]. Cities,2021,119.
[8]Neupane Chiranjivi,Wibowo Santoso,Grandhi Srimannarayana,Deng Hepu. A Trust-Based Model for the Adoption of Smart City Technologies in Australian Regional Cities[J]. Sustainability,2021,13(16).
[9]Zhang Dapeng,Wang Xi,Rong Wenge,Yang Yu. China's practice of smart city standardisation and assessment[J]. IET Smart Cities,2021,3(4).
[10]Le Breton Marie Anaïs,Girardeau Mathilde,Bailleul Helene. From Open Data to Smart City Governing Innovation in the Rennes Metropolitan Area (France)[J]. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR),2021,10(4).
[11]Bajdor Paula,StarostkaPatyk Marta. Smart City: A Bibliometric Analysis of Conceptual Dimensions and Areas[J]. Energies,2021,14(14).
[12]Secinaro Silvana,Brescia Valerio,Calandra Davide,Biancone Paolo. Towards a hybrid model for the management of smart city initiatives[J]. Cities,2021,116.
Tang Miaojun. Exploration on the construction of hospital information platform based on "Internet + intelligent medical care” [J]. China Equipment Engineering, 2022 (06) : 45-46.
Wang Zichen, Feng Jingyi. Chinas intelligent medical system based on Internet of Things technology and its development application[J]. China Medical Equipment, 2022, 37 (01) : 174-179.
Zhang Jianyun, Liu Jiufu, Jin Junliang. Understanding and thinking about intelligent water conservancy [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Transport Engineering, 2019 (06) :1-7. DOI: 10. 16198/ J. cnki. 1009-640x. 2019. 06. 001.
Wang Zhongjing, Wang Guangqian, Wang Jianhua, Wang Hao. Improving water resources efficiency based on water networking and smart water resources [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Technology, 2013, 44 (01) ;1-6. DOI:10. 13928/j. cnki, wrahe. 2013. 01. 004.
Zuo Qiting. China’s water resources development stage and future water “resources 4. 0"strategic concept (J]. Hydropower Energy Science, 2015, 33 (04) : 1-5.
Deng Qinwen, Wang Shifu, Deng Zhaohua. Exploring the path of smart governance in urban communities: the example of "smart city housekeeper" in Zhangchu, Foshan[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2017 (5) : 9-15,30. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2017.05.002.
Zhao Miao Xi, Wang Shi Fu, Li Luying. Urban spatial strategies for the information society- Cold thoughts on the smart city boom[J]. Urban Planning, 2014, 38 (1) :91-96.doi:10.11819/cpr20140117a.
Li Shaochi. Study on countermeasures for building a new type of smart city in Guangzhou- based on the experience of building a smart city in London[J]. Smart City, 2019 (17) :1-4.
Zhang Zhengang, Zhang Xiaojuan. The current situation, problems and countermeasures of Guangzhou
Smart city construction [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2015, 35 (16) :87-93.
Guo Ming jun. Research on the construction of Shenzhen smart city based on citizens*perception [D]. Shaanxi:Northwestern University, 2021.
Jiang Jiefang. Research on the construction of intelligent transportation in Dongguan City [D]. South China University of Technology, 2017.
Yang Yao, Zhao Yaolong, Wang Bin. The construction of a smart city cluster in the Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area under the system of “one link and three lives"[J/OL]. Journal of Geoinformation Science:1-14 [2022-04-15].
Wang Juan. Analysis of Nanjing s smart city construction model based on city characteristics and demands [J]. Tournal of Nanjing Engineering College (Social Science Edition), 2014, 14 (03) :48-53. DOI:10.13960/j.issm.1671-3753.2014.03.011.
Zhang Hong, Fan Manhang, Zhang Chao, Duan Lufeng. A comparat ive study of smart city Construetion models[J]. Journal of Vi' an University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2014, 19 (05) : 116-120. DOI:10.13682/j.issn.2095-6533.2014.05.023.
Deng Xianfeng. Research on the evaluation index system of "smart city" [J]. Development Research, 2010 (12): 111-116.
Qu Van. Research on the evaluation system of China smart city construction level[D]. Dalian University of Technology, 2017.
Ni Jiupai, Li Ping, Wei Chaofu, et al. Evaluation of regional land development potential based on AHP and entropy weighting[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering,2009 (5) :8.
Zou Zhihong, Sun Jingnan, Ren Guangping. Entropy weighting of fuzzy evaluation factors and its application in water quality evaluation[J]. Journal of Environmental Science, 2005, 25 (4) :552-556.
Luo Wenbin, Wang Youjie, Wu Yizhou, et al. A study on the coordination of urban tourism and urban development based on TOPSIS method- Hangzhou City as an example [J].Journal of Tourism, 2008, 23 (12) :5.
Wang Pei Cheng, Wang Pei Xi, Ding Xia Yun. The application of weighted TOPSIS method in the comprehensive evaluation of hospital medical quality [J]. China Health Statistics, 1999.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Manting Zhang, Rudan Wang, Zongyi Xie, Haoyu He, Shumin Li, Yilin Cen, Haichao Wu, Chien Chi Chu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
