Reexamining Doctoral Education: A framework for Leadership in the Context of Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10150Abstract
Traditionally, doctorate in education is pitched on two platforms. The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) is pitched as belonging exclusively to the domain of research and scholarship, while the Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) is pitched as belonging to the domain of active professional practice. This distinction is dysfunctional to bridging the gap between research in the academe and research in professional practice. Research in the academe is often insular with theoretical intents and with outcomes that have limited utility for solving active problems of or in practice in education. This misguided distinction can be corrected through a new thinking of the educational purpose and outcome-expectations for Ph.D. and Ed.D. programs in education. Doctoral education, irrespective of nomenclature (Ph.D. or Ed.D.) should be envisioned as leadership platforms through which knowledge and practice is used seamlessly to continuously ignite innovation and transformation in education. This paper proposes a framework for reexamining doctoral education and their comparative relevance in solving problems of and in practice. The paper aims to position the two doctoral education pathways as platforms for developing leaders who promote the generation and application of knowledge on solutions to problems of and in practice. Author presents a conceptual model that explores the two doctoral pathways through the lens of application of knowledge, research, and practice. Further research is proposed on how doctoral education can enhance practice in educational leadership and foster continuous improvements in education.
References
Leist, J., & Scott, J. A. Differentiation ... but to what degree? The Ed.D. and Ph.D. in Higher Education Programs. Academic Leadership, 2011. 9 (3): p. 1-15.
Shulman, L. S., .Golb, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and proposal. Education Researcher, 2006. 35 (3): p. 25-32.
Pifer, M. J., & Baker, V. L. Stage-based challenges and strategies for support in doctoral education: A practical guide for students, faculty members, and program administrators. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 2016. 11: p. 15-34.
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in general theory of planning, 1973. Policy Sciences, 4 (2): p. 155-169.
Margolin, V. Doctoral Education Design: Problems and Prospects. Design Issues,2010. 26 (3): p. 70-78.
Heathcott, J. Blueprints, tools, and the reality before us: Improving doctoral education in the humanities, 2007. Change, 39 (5): p. 46-51.
Mintz, A. The midwife as matchmaker: Socrates and relational pedagogy. In B. Stengel (Ed.), Philosophy of education, 2007. 91-99. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
Freire, P.). Pedagogy of the oppressed, 1996. New York, NY: Continuum.
Rousseau, J. J. Emile on education, 1979. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Freire, P. Pedagogy of the oppressed, 1996. New York, NY: Continuum.
Ranciere, J. The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lesson in intellectual emancipation, 1991. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10150 455
Ileris, K. Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside schools be bridged? 2009. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 18 (2): p. 137-148
Leist, J., & Scott, J. A. Differentiation ... but to what degree? The Ed.D. and Ph.D. in Higher Education Programs, 2011. Academic Leadership, 9 (3): p. 1-15.
Stephen, H. D. Bridging the gap between research and practice: What’s good, what’s bad, and how can one be sure? 2007. The Phi Delta Kappan, 88 (8): p. 568-578.
Lochmiller, C. R. & Lester, J. N. Conceptualizing practitioner-scholarship for educational leadership research and practice, 2017. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12 (1): p. 3-25.
West, R. Communities of innovation: Individuals, group, and organizational characteristics leading to greater potentials for innovation, 2014. Tech Trends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 58 (5): p. 53-61.
Raws, J. A theory of justice, 1971. Boston, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Connel, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. Making the difference, 1982. Sydney: Australia: Allen and Unwin Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., Hughes, C., Martin, J. E., Mithaug, D. E. & Palmer, S. B. Teaching self-advocacy & student involvement in educational planning. In K. R. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.), Promoting self-determination in students with developmental disabilities, 2007. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Olajide Aguloye
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
