This is not banal or the image as poetic of the banal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.10173Keywords:
Banal, painted images, object images, conceptual device, visual perceptionAbstract
Our objective in this article is to ask the question of the conceptual contribution of René Magritte's work through its relationship with meaning. Beyond trying to express the meaning of his images. Rather, it is to infringe the notion of the "banal" that Magritte has certainly articulated in his work. What is at stake in Magritte's work escapes meaning. So we are faced with an image in itself, in its poetic dimension ; thought-out production of visibility which calls for a view uncluttered from all eyes. In short, an image that sends us back to a pure visual perception.
References
CHIRON Eline (1999). « Le risque en art » Séminaire Interarts de Paris, Editions Kilinckseik.
JONGEN René-Marie (1994). « René Magritte ou la pensée imagée de l'invisible », Editions Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, Bruxelles.
JONGEN René-Marie (1999). « René Marie Jongen, " ceci est un Magritte" », in, Magritte au risque de la sémiotique (sous la direction de EVERAERT-DESMEDT Nicole), Bruxelles, Ed, facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, cou, Lettres, 1999.
NOUGE Paul (1980) « l'histoire de ne pas rire », Lausanne, Editions L'âge d'homme.
EVERAERT-DESMEDT Nicole (2019) « un objet hybride, étude de cas : « la culture des idées », in Magritte au risque de la sémiotique, Bruxelles, Editions facultés universitaires Saint-Louis, cou, Lettres
BRETON André (1965). « Manifeste du surréalisme » Paris Editions Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Fethi BOUZIDA, Ali ELLOUMI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
